Comparison of the Effects of Mucosa Tissue Healing with Chlorhexidine Digluconate and Choline Salicylate in Patients Wearing a Removable Prosthetic Restoration-A RCT.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinics and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.3390/clinpract14060184
Barbara Sekuła-Kamińska, Aleksandra Nitecka-Buchta, Mateusz Wojciechowski, Małgorzata Skucha-Nowak, Małgorzata Rymarczyk, Stefan Baron
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Mucosa Tissue Healing with Chlorhexidine Digluconate and Choline Salicylate in Patients Wearing a Removable Prosthetic Restoration-A RCT.","authors":"Barbara Sekuła-Kamińska, Aleksandra Nitecka-Buchta, Mateusz Wojciechowski, Małgorzata Skucha-Nowak, Małgorzata Rymarczyk, Stefan Baron","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14060184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted based on the CONSORT study protocol for randomized clinical trials (NCT06531720) to compare the effectiveness of oral mucosa healing properties of 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) and 8.7% choline salicylate (CHS), as well as a control group (CON) with no intervention, in patients with delivered partial removable dentures (PRDs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (n = 27) who were enrolled in the study were healthy subjects according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, and they received new PRDs to complement Kennedy's class III and IV deficiencies. During the process of adaptation to new prosthetic restorations, OMLs were formed and treated with one of two selected preparations, either CHX = 0.2% or CHS = 8.7%, in relation to the control group (CON). The wound surface area (WSA) (mm<sup>2</sup>) was measured on repeatable intraoral images taken in accordance with the examination protocol on the first control visit on day 1, day 3, day 7, day 10, and day 14 with the assistance of computer software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences between groups. The fastest effect of WSA complete reduction was observed in the CHX group after 7 days (WAS = 0.78, SD = 1.18) in comparison to CHS = 10 days (WAS = 0.44, SD = 0.90) and CON = 14 days (WAS = 0.22, SD = 0.67). The decrease in the WSA after 7 days of observation was 85.1% in the CHX group, 70.1% in the CHS group, and 59.2% in the CON group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WSA decreased most rapidly after 7 days of treatment with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), slightly more slowly after 10 days of treatment with 8.7% choline salicylate (CHS), and relatively most slowly in the CON group, who were not treated with any topical medication after 14 days. Oral mucosa lesions (OMLs) therapy during the process of adaptation to new removable prosthetic restorations is a very important element supporting the whole process. Topical medications containing 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate are indicated as adjunctive therapy in the process of the supportive treatment and disinfection of oral mucosa lesions. However, this does not release the dentist from liability for the careful adjustment of the removable prosthetic restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 6","pages":"2350-2364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14060184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted based on the CONSORT study protocol for randomized clinical trials (NCT06531720) to compare the effectiveness of oral mucosa healing properties of 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) and 8.7% choline salicylate (CHS), as well as a control group (CON) with no intervention, in patients with delivered partial removable dentures (PRDs).

Materials and methods: Patients (n = 27) who were enrolled in the study were healthy subjects according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, and they received new PRDs to complement Kennedy's class III and IV deficiencies. During the process of adaptation to new prosthetic restorations, OMLs were formed and treated with one of two selected preparations, either CHX = 0.2% or CHS = 8.7%, in relation to the control group (CON). The wound surface area (WSA) (mm2) was measured on repeatable intraoral images taken in accordance with the examination protocol on the first control visit on day 1, day 3, day 7, day 10, and day 14 with the assistance of computer software.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups. The fastest effect of WSA complete reduction was observed in the CHX group after 7 days (WAS = 0.78, SD = 1.18) in comparison to CHS = 10 days (WAS = 0.44, SD = 0.90) and CON = 14 days (WAS = 0.22, SD = 0.67). The decrease in the WSA after 7 days of observation was 85.1% in the CHX group, 70.1% in the CHS group, and 59.2% in the CON group.

Conclusions: The WSA decreased most rapidly after 7 days of treatment with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), slightly more slowly after 10 days of treatment with 8.7% choline salicylate (CHS), and relatively most slowly in the CON group, who were not treated with any topical medication after 14 days. Oral mucosa lesions (OMLs) therapy during the process of adaptation to new removable prosthetic restorations is a very important element supporting the whole process. Topical medications containing 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate are indicated as adjunctive therapy in the process of the supportive treatment and disinfection of oral mucosa lesions. However, this does not release the dentist from liability for the careful adjustment of the removable prosthetic restoration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐和水杨酸胆碱对可摘义齿修复体患者黏膜组织愈合的影响--一项 RCT 研究。
背景和目的:根据CONSORT随机临床试验研究方案(NCT06531720)进行了一项随机双盲临床试验,以比较0.2%洗必泰二葡萄糖酸盐(CHX)和8.7%水杨酸胆碱(CHS)以及无干预的对照组(CON)对已交付部分活动义齿(PRDs)患者口腔粘膜愈合性能的有效性:根据纳入/排除标准,参与研究的患者(n = 27)均为健康人,他们接受了新的局部活动义齿,以补充肯尼迪氏 III 级和 IV 级义齿的不足。在适应新修复体的过程中,形成了OML,并使用两种选定制剂中的一种(CHX = 0.2%或CHS = 8.7%)进行治疗,与对照组(CON)相比。在计算机软件的帮助下,根据第一次对照组就诊的第 1 天、第 3 天、第 7 天、第 10 天和第 14 天的检查方案,在可重复的口腔内图像上测量伤口表面积(WSA)(mm2):各组间无统计学差异。与 CHS = 10 天(WAS = 0.44,SD = 0.90)和 CON = 14 天(WAS = 0.22,SD = 0.67)相比,CHX 组在 7 天后(WAS = 0.78,SD = 1.18)WSA 完全下降的效果最快。观察 7 天后,CHX 组的 WSA 下降率为 85.1%,CHS 组为 70.1%,CON 组为 59.2%:结论:0.2% 洗必泰二氯醋酸(CHX)治疗 7 天后,WSA 下降最快;8.7% 水杨酸胆碱(CHS)治疗 10 天后,WSA 下降稍慢;14 天后未使用任何外用药物的 CON 组 WSA 下降相对最慢。在适应新的可摘义齿修复体的过程中,口腔黏膜病变(OMLs)治疗是支持整个过程的一个非常重要的因素。含有 0.2% 洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐的外用药物可作为口腔粘膜病变辅助治疗和消毒过程中的辅助疗法。但是,这并不能免除牙医仔细调整可摘义齿修复体的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Extraperitoneal Open Radical Cystectomy: A New Standard in Frail Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer? Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: From Basics to Clinical and Nutritional Management. Clinical Acceptance of Digitally Produced Zirconia and Metal Post and Cores, Based on the Impression Method. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Parents Regarding Ophthalmological Screening of Preschool-Aged Children in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Running Cadence and the Influence on Frontal Plane Knee Deviations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1