You say it's not me: the influence of offering external explanations of rejection and acceptance behavior on the perception of benevolence in borderline personality disorder.

Anna Schulze, Berit Rommelfanger, Elisabeth Schendel, Kornelius Immanuel Kammler-Sücker, Stefanie Lis
{"title":"You say it's not me: the influence of offering external explanations of rejection and acceptance behavior on the perception of benevolence in borderline personality disorder.","authors":"Anna Schulze, Berit Rommelfanger, Elisabeth Schendel, Kornelius Immanuel Kammler-Sücker, Stefanie Lis","doi":"10.1186/s40479-024-00275-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interpersonal impairments in patients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are characterized by the fear of being rejected and high levels of loneliness. Potential underlying factors are alterations in the processing of social interactions and the associated perceptions of social partners. In this regard, BPD patients tend to attribute the cause of negative rather than positive events to their own person and to perceive others as less trustworthy than healthy controls (HCs). To date, no study has investigated whether the effect of experimentally influenced causal attributions of social interactions on the perception of a social partner differs between BPD patients and HCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A new virtual reality paradigm was developed to investigate the perception of benevolence following the induction of social rejection and acceptance, while experimentally manipulating whether an external cause for this behavior was provided. The data of 62 participants (32 HCs, 30 BPD patients) were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Associations of benevolence ratings with attributional style, rejection sensitivity, self-esteem, childhood trauma, and loneliness were investigated via correlational and multiple linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across both groups, a social partner was rated as less benevolent following rejection than following acceptance. An external explanation mitigated this negative effect of rejection. Overall, benevolence ratings were lower in BPD patients than in HCs. This group difference was stronger following acceptance than following rejection. Independent of acceptance and rejection, an external explanation was associated with a higher level of benevolence only in the HC group. No associations of the effects of the experimental conditions with attributional style, childhood trauma, rejection sensitivity, self-esteem, or loneliness were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that acceptance and provided external explanations for rejection have a less positive impact on the perception of a social partner's attitude toward oneself in BPD patients than in HCs. More research is needed to identify predictors of benevolence perception and which steps of social information processing are altered. The therapeutic implications include the importance of strengthening the perception and enjoyment of being accepted as well as improving the mentalizing ability of BPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48586,"journal":{"name":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","volume":"11 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-024-00275-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interpersonal impairments in patients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are characterized by the fear of being rejected and high levels of loneliness. Potential underlying factors are alterations in the processing of social interactions and the associated perceptions of social partners. In this regard, BPD patients tend to attribute the cause of negative rather than positive events to their own person and to perceive others as less trustworthy than healthy controls (HCs). To date, no study has investigated whether the effect of experimentally influenced causal attributions of social interactions on the perception of a social partner differs between BPD patients and HCs.

Methods: A new virtual reality paradigm was developed to investigate the perception of benevolence following the induction of social rejection and acceptance, while experimentally manipulating whether an external cause for this behavior was provided. The data of 62 participants (32 HCs, 30 BPD patients) were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Associations of benevolence ratings with attributional style, rejection sensitivity, self-esteem, childhood trauma, and loneliness were investigated via correlational and multiple linear regression analyses.

Results: Across both groups, a social partner was rated as less benevolent following rejection than following acceptance. An external explanation mitigated this negative effect of rejection. Overall, benevolence ratings were lower in BPD patients than in HCs. This group difference was stronger following acceptance than following rejection. Independent of acceptance and rejection, an external explanation was associated with a higher level of benevolence only in the HC group. No associations of the effects of the experimental conditions with attributional style, childhood trauma, rejection sensitivity, self-esteem, or loneliness were found.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that acceptance and provided external explanations for rejection have a less positive impact on the perception of a social partner's attitude toward oneself in BPD patients than in HCs. More research is needed to identify predictors of benevolence perception and which steps of social information processing are altered. The therapeutic implications include the importance of strengthening the perception and enjoyment of being accepted as well as improving the mentalizing ability of BPD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你说不是我:为边缘型人格障碍患者的拒绝和接受行为提供外部解释对其仁慈感的影响。
背景:被诊断为边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的患者的人际交往障碍表现为害怕被拒绝和高度孤独。潜在的潜在因素是社会交往处理过程中的改变以及对社会伙伴的相关看法。在这方面,BPD 患者倾向于将消极事件而非积极事件的原因归咎于自己,并认为他人比健康对照组(HCs)更不可信。迄今为止,还没有研究调查过受实验影响的社会交往因果归因对 BPD 患者和 HCs 对社会伙伴的感知是否有不同的影响:方法:研究人员开发了一种新的虚拟现实范式,以调查在诱导社交拒绝和接受后对仁慈的感知,同时通过实验操纵是否为这种行为提供了外部原因。我们使用线性混合效应模型分析了62名参与者(32名HC,30名BPD患者)的数据。通过相关分析和多元线性回归分析,研究了仁慈评分与归因风格、拒绝敏感性、自尊、童年创伤和孤独感之间的关系:结果:在两组人中,被拒绝后对社会伙伴的仁慈评价低于被接受后对社会伙伴的仁慈评价。外部解释减轻了拒绝的负面影响。总体而言,BPD 患者的仁慈评分低于 HC 患者。这种群体差异在接受后比拒绝后更明显。与接受和拒绝无关的是,外部解释只与高危人群的仁慈程度较高有关。实验条件的影响与归因风格、童年创伤、拒绝敏感性、自尊或孤独感均无关联:我们的研究结果表明,与普通人相比,BPD 患者对拒绝的接受和外部解释对其感知社会伙伴对自己态度的积极影响较小。还需要进行更多的研究,以确定仁慈感知的预测因素以及社会信息处理的哪些步骤发生了改变。其治疗意义包括,必须加强 BPD 患者对被接纳的感知和享受,并提高他们的心智化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
30
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation provides a platform for researchers and clinicians interested in borderline personality disorder (BPD) as a currently highly challenging psychiatric disorder. Emotion dysregulation is at the core of BPD but also stands on its own as a major pathological component of the underlying neurobiology of various other psychiatric disorders. The journal focuses on the psychological, social and neurobiological aspects of emotion dysregulation as well as epidemiology, phenomenology, pathophysiology, treatment, neurobiology, genetics, and animal models of BPD.
期刊最新文献
Associations between maternal personality dysfunction and emotion suppression and adolescent emotion suppression. You say it's not me: the influence of offering external explanations of rejection and acceptance behavior on the perception of benevolence in borderline personality disorder. Trajectory of Non-suicidal Self-Injury among adolescents with borderline personality disorder over a 5-year period. Feeling close to others? Social cognitive mechanisms of intimacy in personality disorders. A cluster analysis of attachment styles in patients with borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder and ADHD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1