Processing of self-related thoughts in experienced users of classic psychedelics: A source localisation EEG study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-10 Epub Date: 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111196
Anastasia Ruban, Mikołaj Magnuski, Justyna Hobot, Paweł Orłowski, Aleksandra Kołodziej, Michał Bola, Aneta Brzezicka
{"title":"Processing of self-related thoughts in experienced users of classic psychedelics: A source localisation EEG study.","authors":"Anastasia Ruban, Mikołaj Magnuski, Justyna Hobot, Paweł Orłowski, Aleksandra Kołodziej, Michał Bola, Aneta Brzezicka","doi":"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychedelics have gained increasing interest in scientific research due to their ability to induce profound alterations in perception, emotional processing and self-consciousness. However, the research regarding the functioning of individuals who use psychedelics in naturalistic contexts remains limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Here we aim to explore psychological and neurophysiological differences between naturalistic psychedelics users and non-users in terms of processing of self-related thoughts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use behavioural testing combined with electroencephalography (EEG) with source localisation. To mitigate potential confounding effects of personality traits and personal history which makes one willing to take psychedelics, we compared users to individuals who did not take psychedelics, but are intending to do so in the future. To ensure robustness of our results, we included two datasets collected at two different laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from Dataset I (N = 70) suggest that during self-related thoughts psychedelics users exhibit weaker increases in alpha and beta power in comparison to non-users, primarily in brain regions linked to processing of self-related information and memory (such as posterior cingulate cortex). However, analysis of Dataset II (N = 38) did not replicate the between-group effects, possibly due to the smaller sample size and spatial resolution limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While non-replicability restricts interpretation of our findings, our research expands the ongoing discussion on strength and duration of the psychedelic effects, specifically in brain circuits associated with self-related processing, and its relationship to well-being. Our results fit into growing scepticism about the specificity of the role of default-mode network hubs in changes associated with psychedelics experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":54549,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"111196"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychedelics have gained increasing interest in scientific research due to their ability to induce profound alterations in perception, emotional processing and self-consciousness. However, the research regarding the functioning of individuals who use psychedelics in naturalistic contexts remains limited.

Aims: Here we aim to explore psychological and neurophysiological differences between naturalistic psychedelics users and non-users in terms of processing of self-related thoughts.

Methods: We use behavioural testing combined with electroencephalography (EEG) with source localisation. To mitigate potential confounding effects of personality traits and personal history which makes one willing to take psychedelics, we compared users to individuals who did not take psychedelics, but are intending to do so in the future. To ensure robustness of our results, we included two datasets collected at two different laboratories.

Results: The results from Dataset I (N = 70) suggest that during self-related thoughts psychedelics users exhibit weaker increases in alpha and beta power in comparison to non-users, primarily in brain regions linked to processing of self-related information and memory (such as posterior cingulate cortex). However, analysis of Dataset II (N = 38) did not replicate the between-group effects, possibly due to the smaller sample size and spatial resolution limitations.

Conclusions: While non-replicability restricts interpretation of our findings, our research expands the ongoing discussion on strength and duration of the psychedelic effects, specifically in brain circuits associated with self-related processing, and its relationship to well-being. Our results fit into growing scepticism about the specificity of the role of default-mode network hubs in changes associated with psychedelics experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经典迷幻药资深使用者对自我相关想法的处理:源定位脑电图研究
背景:迷幻药能够引起感知、情绪处理和自我意识的深刻变化,因此在科学研究中越来越受到关注。目的:在此,我们旨在探索自然迷幻药使用者和非使用者在处理自我相关想法方面的心理和神经生理学差异:方法:我们使用行为测试结合脑电图(EEG)进行源定位。为了减少人格特质和个人经历可能造成的混淆影响,我们将服用者与未服用迷幻药但将来打算服用的人进行了比较。为了确保结果的稳健性,我们纳入了在两个不同实验室收集的两个数据集:数据集 I(N = 70)的结果表明,在与自我相关的思考过程中,与不服用迷幻药的人相比,服用迷幻药的人的α和β功率增加较弱,主要是在与处理自我相关信息和记忆有关的脑区(如后扣带回皮层)。然而,对数据集II(N = 38)的分析没有复制组间效应,这可能是由于样本量较小和空间分辨率的限制:虽然不可复制性限制了我们对研究结果的解释,但我们的研究拓展了目前关于迷幻效应强度和持续时间的讨论,特别是在与自我相关处理有关的大脑回路中,以及其与幸福感的关系。我们的研究结果符合人们对默认模式网络枢纽在与迷幻药体验相关的变化中所起作用的特异性日益增长的怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry is an international and multidisciplinary journal which aims to ensure the rapid publication of authoritative reviews and research papers dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry. Issues of the journal are regularly devoted wholly in or in part to a topical subject. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unless the pharmacological active molecular substrate and/or specific receptor binding properties of the extract compounds are elucidated.
期刊最新文献
Microglia-derived sEV: Friend or foe in the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment. Two pores instead of one: Gating pore current and the electrical leak in autism and epilepsy Peripheral transcutaneous electrical stimulation to improve cognition: a review of the main effects in healthy humans and in mildly cognitively impaired patient populations Genetic insights of lipid metabolism and lipid-lowering drugs with Lewy body dementia risk: Evidence from Mendelian randomization The acute effects of methoxphenidine on behaviour and pharmacokinetics profile in animal model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1