Quality of Life Among Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Receiving Telemedicine Care in Vietnam.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0440
Phuong Minh Tran, Hieu Ba Tran, Dung Viet Nguyen, Hung Manh Pham, Loi Doan Do, Ha Quoc Nguyen, James N Kirkpatrick, Rajesh Janardhanan, Christopher M Reid, Hoai Thu Thi Nguyen
{"title":"Quality of Life Among Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Receiving Telemedicine Care in Vietnam.","authors":"Phuong Minh Tran, Hieu Ba Tran, Dung Viet Nguyen, Hung Manh Pham, Loi Doan Do, Ha Quoc Nguyen, James N Kirkpatrick, Rajesh Janardhanan, Christopher M Reid, Hoai Thu Thi Nguyen","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Telemedicine is an effective method to monitor patients at home and improve outcomes of heart failure (HF), especially HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, little is known about the impact of telemedicine on the quality of life (QoL) among outpatients with HFrEF in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, open, and parallel-group clinical trial in northern Vietnam, patients with HFrEF were allocated to either telemedicine or control groups. Participants in the experimental arm underwent a home-based telemedicine program with regular telephone follow-ups and consultations. Participants in the control group received usual care. Both groups were followed for 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score from baseline. The analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 223 participants were randomized into two groups-the telemedicine group and the usual care group. Of the 223, 170 patients [mean age: 61.5 ± 15.0 years; female: 122 (71.8%)] completed follow-up and were included in the final analysis (87 in the telemedicine group and 83 in the usual care group). At baseline, the MLHFQ scores were equivalent between the two groups (median [interquartile range]: 81 [73-92] vs. 81 [74-92]; <i>p</i> = 0.992). After 6-month follow-up, the telemedicine group showed greater improvement in MLHFQ total scores than the usual care group (mean change in MLHFQ score: -15.5 ± 14.0 vs. -1.3 ± 6.2; difference in change: -14.2 [95% confidence interval, CI: -17.5, -11.0]; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Similar results were found for the MLHFQ physical dimension score (difference in change: -5.8 [95% CI: -7.4, -4.1]; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and the MLHFQ emotional dimension score (difference in change: -3.2 [95% CI: -4.2, -2.2]; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this study, a telemedicine intervention significantly improved QoL compared with usual care among patients with HFrEF in an LMIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine is an effective method to monitor patients at home and improve outcomes of heart failure (HF), especially HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, little is known about the impact of telemedicine on the quality of life (QoL) among outpatients with HFrEF in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: In this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, open, and parallel-group clinical trial in northern Vietnam, patients with HFrEF were allocated to either telemedicine or control groups. Participants in the experimental arm underwent a home-based telemedicine program with regular telephone follow-ups and consultations. Participants in the control group received usual care. Both groups were followed for 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score from baseline. The analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: A total of 223 participants were randomized into two groups-the telemedicine group and the usual care group. Of the 223, 170 patients [mean age: 61.5 ± 15.0 years; female: 122 (71.8%)] completed follow-up and were included in the final analysis (87 in the telemedicine group and 83 in the usual care group). At baseline, the MLHFQ scores were equivalent between the two groups (median [interquartile range]: 81 [73-92] vs. 81 [74-92]; p = 0.992). After 6-month follow-up, the telemedicine group showed greater improvement in MLHFQ total scores than the usual care group (mean change in MLHFQ score: -15.5 ± 14.0 vs. -1.3 ± 6.2; difference in change: -14.2 [95% confidence interval, CI: -17.5, -11.0]; p < 0.0001). Similar results were found for the MLHFQ physical dimension score (difference in change: -5.8 [95% CI: -7.4, -4.1]; p < 0.0001) and the MLHFQ emotional dimension score (difference in change: -3.2 [95% CI: -4.2, -2.2]; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In this study, a telemedicine intervention significantly improved QoL compared with usual care among patients with HFrEF in an LMIC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
越南接受远程医疗护理的射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者的生活质量。
背景:远程医疗是在家监测患者和改善心力衰竭(HF)预后的有效方法,尤其是射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)。然而,人们对远程医疗对中低收入国家(LMICs)门诊心衰患者生活质量(QoL)的影响知之甚少。方法:在越南北部进行的这项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照、开放式和平行组临床试验中,HFrEF 患者被分配到远程医疗组或对照组。实验组的参与者接受基于家庭的远程医疗项目,并定期接受电话随访和咨询。对照组的参与者接受常规护理。两组患者均接受了 6 个月的随访。主要结果是明尼苏达心衰患者生活问卷(MLHFQ)得分与基线相比的变化。分析以意向治疗为基础进行。结果共有 223 名参与者被随机分为两组--远程医疗组和常规护理组。在这 223 名患者中,有 170 名患者[平均年龄:61.5 ± 15.0 岁;女性:122 名(71.8%)]完成了随访并被纳入最终分析(远程医疗组 87 名,常规护理组 83 名)。基线时,两组的 MLHFQ 分数相当(中位数[四分位数间距]:81 [73-92] vs. 81 [74-92]; p = 0.992)。随访 6 个月后,远程医疗组的 MLHFQ 总分改善幅度大于常规护理组(MLHFQ 平均得分变化:-15.5 ± 14.0 vs. -1.3 ± 6.2;变化差异:-14.2 [95% 置信区间,CI:-17.5, -11.0];p < 0.0001)。MLHFQ身体维度评分(变化差异:-5.8 [95% 置信区间:-7.4,-4.1];p < 0.0001)和MLHFQ情绪维度评分(变化差异:-3.2 [95% 置信区间:-4.2,-2.2];p < 0.0001)也有类似结果。结论在这项研究中,与常规护理相比,远程医疗干预极大地改善了低收入国家高频心衰患者的 QoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
Quality of Life Among Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Receiving Telemedicine Care in Vietnam. The Association Between Telehealth Use During Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder and Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Acceptability of Forensic Sexual Assault Telehealth Consultation. Taking a Step Back or a Step Forward. Tele-Critical Care, Severity of Illness, and 30-Day Mortality Risk: A Retrospective, Cohort Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1