Effectiveness of Neonatal Resuscitation Training Programs, Implementation, and Scale-Up in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1159/000542539
Davneet Sihota, Rachel Lee Him, Georgia Dominguez, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
{"title":"Effectiveness of Neonatal Resuscitation Training Programs, Implementation, and Scale-Up in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.","authors":"Davneet Sihota, Rachel Lee Him, Georgia Dominguez, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta","doi":"10.1159/000542539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To describe recent evidence regarding the most effective neonatal resuscitation training program and scale-up of these programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which has contributed to the upcoming Lancet Global Newborn Care Series 2025, and forms part of a supplement describing an extensive synthesis on effective newborn interventions in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included relevant studies from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL and Global Index Medicus databases on the effectiveness and scale-up of Neonatal Resuscitation Training Programs (NRTP), with searches run August 2022. Data extraction and quality assessments were completed independently and in duplicate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 unique records met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analyses across the reviews. NRTPs improved most knowledge and skill-based outcomes but impact on mortality varied. Included studies identified knowledge and skill retention, standardized training protocols, and limited training opportunities for health care providers as challenges to current NRTPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reported knowledge, skills, and mortality outcomes were similar across NRTPs. The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) program was found to be cost-effective in Tanzania, suggesting that the HBB program or elements thereof are low-cost and scalable in LMICs. Future research across diverse settings should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of other NRTPs. To scale-up current NRTPs, programs should focus on improving long-term retention outcomes and improving training material accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To describe recent evidence regarding the most effective neonatal resuscitation training program and scale-up of these programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which has contributed to the upcoming Lancet Global Newborn Care Series 2025, and forms part of a supplement describing an extensive synthesis on effective newborn interventions in LMICs.

Methods: We included relevant studies from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL and Global Index Medicus databases on the effectiveness and scale-up of Neonatal Resuscitation Training Programs (NRTP), with searches run August 2022. Data extraction and quality assessments were completed independently and in duplicate.

Results: A total of 93 unique records met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analyses across the reviews. NRTPs improved most knowledge and skill-based outcomes but impact on mortality varied. Included studies identified knowledge and skill retention, standardized training protocols, and limited training opportunities for health care providers as challenges to current NRTPs.

Conclusion: Reported knowledge, skills, and mortality outcomes were similar across NRTPs. The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) program was found to be cost-effective in Tanzania, suggesting that the HBB program or elements thereof are low-cost and scalable in LMICs. Future research across diverse settings should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of other NRTPs. To scale-up current NRTPs, programs should focus on improving long-term retention outcomes and improving training material accessibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中低收入国家新生儿复苏培训计划、实施和推广的有效性。
导言:描述有关中低收入国家(LMICs)最有效的新生儿复苏培训计划和推广这些计划的最新证据,这些证据为即将出版的《柳叶刀全球新生儿护理丛书 2025》做出了贡献,并构成了描述中低收入国家有效新生儿干预措施广泛综述的补编的一部分:我们从 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane CENTRAL 和 Global Index Medicus 数据库中纳入了有关新生儿复苏培训计划 (NRTP) 的有效性和推广的相关研究,检索时间为 2022 年 8 月。数据提取和质量评估均独立完成,一式两份:共有 93 条独特的记录符合资格标准,并纳入了我们的综述分析。NRTPs改善了大多数基于知识和技能的结果,但对死亡率的影响各不相同。所纳入的研究指出,知识和技能的保留、标准化培训方案以及医疗服务提供者有限的培训机会是当前 NRTPs 面临的挑战:结论:各 NRTPs 报告的知识、技能和死亡率结果相似。在坦桑尼亚,"帮助婴儿呼吸"(HBB)项目被认为具有成本效益,这表明 "帮助婴儿呼吸 "项目或其内容在低收入、中等收入国家的成本较低且可推广。未来针对不同环境的研究应评估其他 NRTPs 的成本效益。要推广当前的 NRTPs,计划应侧重于改善长期保留结果和提高培训材料的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxygenation of Immature Infants in the Delivery Room and Beyond. A Quest for Future Research. Caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity: single center study on dosing practices and perceived effectiveness. Gut Pathogen Colonization: A Risk Factor to Bloodstream Infections in Preterm Neonates Admitted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit - A Prospective Cohort Study. Growth and cognitive outcome in very preterm infants with postnatal cytomegalovirus infection. Urinary lactate-to-creatinine ratio during the first days of life correlates with the degree of brain damage in premature infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1