Effects of Instruction–Problem Arrangements in Video Tutorials for Software Training

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1109/TPC.2024.3449508
Hans van der Meij;Tessa Voerman
{"title":"Effects of Instruction–Problem Arrangements in Video Tutorials for Software Training","authors":"Hans van der Meij;Tessa Voerman","doi":"10.1109/TPC.2024.3449508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In this study, we examined the effectiveness of three instruction-production arrangements: instruction-problem solving (I-PS), problem solving-instruction (PS-I), and problem solving-instruction-problem solving (PS-I-PS)) in video tutorials for software training. Literature review: Most of the research on these arrangements stems from math and physics and has yielded equivocal outcomes. Studies of software training are scarce and have also led to varying results. In these studies, video access was prohibited once participants engaged in problem solving. Our study did not have this limitation. Research methodology: We followed an experimental approach with three conditions: I-PS, PS-I, and PS-I-PS. Research questions: 1. What is the effect of condition on video processing? 2. What is the effect of condition on motivation? 3: What is the effect of condition on procedural knowledge development? Results: In all conditions, all videos were viewed nearly in full. Replays of sections were scarce. In all conditions, self-efficacy rose substantially and more in I-PS than in PS-I. All conditions achieved very high scores on a final procedural knowledge test. I-PS did significantly better than PS-I on this test. Conclusion: The high absolute scores for self-efficacy and procedural knowledge presumably reflect the quality of the Demonstration-Based-Training videos developed for the study. Self-efficacy and procedural knowledge development was significantly higher in I-PS than in PS-I. In short, the data show that the best results were obtained for the video tutorial in which instruction preceded problem solving.","PeriodicalId":46950,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","volume":"67 4","pages":"455-470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10684429/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this study, we examined the effectiveness of three instruction-production arrangements: instruction-problem solving (I-PS), problem solving-instruction (PS-I), and problem solving-instruction-problem solving (PS-I-PS)) in video tutorials for software training. Literature review: Most of the research on these arrangements stems from math and physics and has yielded equivocal outcomes. Studies of software training are scarce and have also led to varying results. In these studies, video access was prohibited once participants engaged in problem solving. Our study did not have this limitation. Research methodology: We followed an experimental approach with three conditions: I-PS, PS-I, and PS-I-PS. Research questions: 1. What is the effect of condition on video processing? 2. What is the effect of condition on motivation? 3: What is the effect of condition on procedural knowledge development? Results: In all conditions, all videos were viewed nearly in full. Replays of sections were scarce. In all conditions, self-efficacy rose substantially and more in I-PS than in PS-I. All conditions achieved very high scores on a final procedural knowledge test. I-PS did significantly better than PS-I on this test. Conclusion: The high absolute scores for self-efficacy and procedural knowledge presumably reflect the quality of the Demonstration-Based-Training videos developed for the study. Self-efficacy and procedural knowledge development was significantly higher in I-PS than in PS-I. In short, the data show that the best results were obtained for the video tutorial in which instruction preceded problem solving.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件培训视频教程中教学-问题安排的效果
研究背景在本研究中,我们考察了软件培训视频教程中三种教学-制作安排的有效性:教学-问题解决(I-PS)、问题解决-教学(PS-I)和问题解决-教学-问题解决(PS-I-PS)。文献回顾:有关这些安排的研究大多源于数学和物理学,其结果不尽相同。有关软件培训的研究很少,结果也不尽相同。在这些研究中,一旦参与者参与解决问题,就禁止视频访问。我们的研究则没有这种限制。研究方法:我们采用了三种条件的实验方法:I-PS、PS-I 和 PS-I-PS。研究问题1.条件对视频处理有什么影响?2.条件对动机有什么影响?3. 条件对程序性知识发展有何影响?结果:在所有条件下,所有视频几乎都被完整观看。重播的部分很少。在所有条件下,自我效能感都大幅上升,I-PS 比 PS-I 上升幅度更大。在最后的程序性知识测试中,所有条件都获得了非常高的分数。在该测试中,I-PS 明显优于 PS-I。结论自我效能感和程序性知识的绝对高分大概反映了为本研究制作的示范培训视频的质量。I-PS 的自我效能感和程序性知识发展明显高于 PS-I。总之,数据显示,在解决问题之前进行教学的视频教程取得了最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to applied research on professional communication—including but not limited to technical and business communication. Papers should address the research interests and needs of technical communicators, engineers, scientists, information designers, editors, linguists, translators, managers, business professionals, and others from around the globe who practice, conduct research on, and teach others about effective professional communication. The Transactions publishes original, empirical research that addresses one of these contexts: The communication practices of technical professionals, such as engineers and scientists The practices of professional communicators who work in technical or business environments Evidence-based methods for teaching and practicing professional and technical communication.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Information for Authors Getting it Wrong: Student Estimations of Time and the Number of Drafts in Linked Computer Science and Technical Communication Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1