Explainable machine learning techniques for hybrid nanofluids transport characteristics: an evaluation of shapley additive and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1007/s10973-024-13639-x
Praveen Kumar Kanti,  Prabhakar Sharma, V. Vicki Wanatasanappan, Nejla Mahjoub Said
{"title":"Explainable machine learning techniques for hybrid nanofluids transport characteristics: an evaluation of shapley additive and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations","authors":"Praveen Kumar Kanti,&nbsp; Prabhakar Sharma,&nbsp;V. Vicki Wanatasanappan,&nbsp;Nejla Mahjoub Said","doi":"10.1007/s10973-024-13639-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Comprehending and managing the transport characteristics of nanofluids is critical for improving their efficacy in heat transfer applications, thereby improving thermal management systems. This research focuses on investigating the impact of varying concentrations (0.05–1 vol.%) and temperatures (30–60 °C) on the thermal conductivity and viscosity of water-based nanofluids. These nanofluids contain graphene oxide, silicon dioxide, and titanium dioxide, as well as hybrid combinations thereof. The research revealed that nanofluids exhibit higher viscosity and thermal conductivity compared to water. The maximum thermal conductivity and viscosity of 1.52 and 2.77 are observed for GO for 1 vol% compared to the water at 60 and 30 °C, respectively. Notably, graphene oxide nanofluid exhibits the highest thermal conductivity and viscosity among all the studied nanofluids. These findings imply that graphene oxide and its hybrid nanofluids hold promise for enhancing heat transfer and energy efficiency in various industrial applications. The modeling and simulation of hybrid nanofluids' thermophysical properties are difficult and time-consuming. Modern machine learning algorithms are capable of handling such complex data. As a result, in the current investigation, two distinct ensembles and deep learning-based techniques, deep neural networks and extreme gradient boost, were used. The statistical examination of the viscosity model shows that the extreme gradient boost-based model had an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 0.9122, while the deep neural network-based model had just 0.7371. The mean square error for the extreme gradient boost-based model was just 0.010, whereas it climbed to 0.0329 for the deep neural network-based model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","volume":"149 21","pages":"11599 - 11618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-024-13639-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehending and managing the transport characteristics of nanofluids is critical for improving their efficacy in heat transfer applications, thereby improving thermal management systems. This research focuses on investigating the impact of varying concentrations (0.05–1 vol.%) and temperatures (30–60 °C) on the thermal conductivity and viscosity of water-based nanofluids. These nanofluids contain graphene oxide, silicon dioxide, and titanium dioxide, as well as hybrid combinations thereof. The research revealed that nanofluids exhibit higher viscosity and thermal conductivity compared to water. The maximum thermal conductivity and viscosity of 1.52 and 2.77 are observed for GO for 1 vol% compared to the water at 60 and 30 °C, respectively. Notably, graphene oxide nanofluid exhibits the highest thermal conductivity and viscosity among all the studied nanofluids. These findings imply that graphene oxide and its hybrid nanofluids hold promise for enhancing heat transfer and energy efficiency in various industrial applications. The modeling and simulation of hybrid nanofluids' thermophysical properties are difficult and time-consuming. Modern machine learning algorithms are capable of handling such complex data. As a result, in the current investigation, two distinct ensembles and deep learning-based techniques, deep neural networks and extreme gradient boost, were used. The statistical examination of the viscosity model shows that the extreme gradient boost-based model had an R2 value of 0.9122, while the deep neural network-based model had just 0.7371. The mean square error for the extreme gradient boost-based model was just 0.010, whereas it climbed to 0.0329 for the deep neural network-based model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合纳米流体输运特性的可解释机器学习技术:对夏普利加成法和局部可解释模型的解释进行评估
了解和管理纳米流体的传输特性对于提高其在传热应用中的功效,从而改善热管理系统至关重要。本研究的重点是调查不同浓度(0.05-1 vol.%)和温度(30-60 °C)对水基纳米流体的导热性和粘度的影响。这些纳米流体包含氧化石墨烯、二氧化硅和二氧化钛,以及它们的混合组合。研究发现,与水相比,纳米流体具有更高的粘度和热导率。在 60 °C 和 30 °C 温度下,与水相比,1 vol% 的 GO 的最大热导率和粘度分别为 1.52 和 2.77。值得注意的是,在所有研究的纳米流体中,氧化石墨烯纳米流体的热导率和粘度最高。这些研究结果表明,氧化石墨烯及其混合纳米流体有望在各种工业应用中提高传热和能效。混合纳米流体热物理性质的建模和模拟既困难又耗时。现代机器学习算法能够处理如此复杂的数据。因此,在目前的研究中,使用了两种不同的集合和基于深度学习的技术,即深度神经网络和极梯度提升。对粘度模型的统计检查显示,基于极梯度提升的模型的 R2 值为 0.9122,而基于深度神经网络的模型的 R2 值仅为 0.7371。基于极梯度提升的模型的均方误差仅为 0.010,而基于深度神经网络的模型的均方误差则攀升至 0.0329。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry is a fully peer reviewed journal publishing high quality papers covering all aspects of thermal analysis, calorimetry, and experimental thermodynamics. The journal publishes regular and special issues in twelve issues every year. The following types of papers are published: Original Research Papers, Short Communications, Reviews, Modern Instruments, Events and Book reviews. The subjects covered are: thermogravimetry, derivative thermogravimetry, differential thermal analysis, thermodilatometry, differential scanning calorimetry of all types, non-scanning calorimetry of all types, thermometry, evolved gas analysis, thermomechanical analysis, emanation thermal analysis, thermal conductivity, multiple techniques, and miscellaneous thermal methods (including the combination of the thermal method with various instrumental techniques), theory and instrumentation for thermal analysis and calorimetry.
期刊最新文献
Numerical investigation of chemical reactive MHD fluid dynamics over a porous surface with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux Lithium-ion battery equivalent thermal conductivity testing method based on Bayesian optimization algorithm Numerical study and optimization of a ferrofluid-filled cavity with thick vertical walls and an elliptical obstacle at the center Performance evaluation and mathematical modeling of reverse osmosis membrane desalination unit Experimental and model study on flame radiation characteristics of ethanol spill fires in tunnel environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1