Assessment of the CO2 sequestration potential of waste concrete fines

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Materials and Structures Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1617/s11527-024-02531-7
Vislavath Haripan, Ravindra Gettu, Manu Santhanam
{"title":"Assessment of the CO2 sequestration potential of waste concrete fines","authors":"Vislavath Haripan,&nbsp;Ravindra Gettu,&nbsp;Manu Santhanam","doi":"10.1617/s11527-024-02531-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A significant amount of CO<sub>2</sub> is released into the atmosphere during mining and production of construction materials, negatively affecting the environment. Reabsorption of the CO<sub>2</sub> into new construction materials could compensate for some of the negative impacts. This study aims to explore the CO<sub>2</sub> uptake capacity of waste concrete fines (WCF) and their role in lowering the environmental impact of concrete. It examines the effects of various factors such as source, composition, and grain size distribution on the CO<sub>2</sub> uptake capacity of WCF. The CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration potential and the degree of carbonation of WCF fractions were measured by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The results showed that the WCF from thermomechanical beneficiation had the highest CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, followed by the WCF from ready-mixed concrete sludge. This was due to the higher content and reactivity of calcium oxide (CaO) in these materials, which is derived from the hydrated cement paste. The WCF from different sources and processes exhibited different chemical and mineralogical compositions, which affected their CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration capacity. WCF showed CO<sub>2</sub> uptake potential ranging from 4.9 to 18.2% based on the source, size of the WCF and production method of RCA. The study suggests that CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by WCF could offset about 10–28% of the net carbon footprint associated with concrete production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"57 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-024-02531-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A significant amount of CO2 is released into the atmosphere during mining and production of construction materials, negatively affecting the environment. Reabsorption of the CO2 into new construction materials could compensate for some of the negative impacts. This study aims to explore the CO2 uptake capacity of waste concrete fines (WCF) and their role in lowering the environmental impact of concrete. It examines the effects of various factors such as source, composition, and grain size distribution on the CO2 uptake capacity of WCF. The CO2 sequestration potential and the degree of carbonation of WCF fractions were measured by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The results showed that the WCF from thermomechanical beneficiation had the highest CO2 uptake, followed by the WCF from ready-mixed concrete sludge. This was due to the higher content and reactivity of calcium oxide (CaO) in these materials, which is derived from the hydrated cement paste. The WCF from different sources and processes exhibited different chemical and mineralogical compositions, which affected their CO2 sequestration capacity. WCF showed CO2 uptake potential ranging from 4.9 to 18.2% based on the source, size of the WCF and production method of RCA. The study suggests that CO2 uptake by WCF could offset about 10–28% of the net carbon footprint associated with concrete production.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
废弃混凝土细粒二氧化碳封存潜力评估
在建筑材料的开采和生产过程中,大量二氧化碳被释放到大气中,对环境造成负面影响。将二氧化碳重新吸收到新的建筑材料中可以弥补部分负面影响。本研究旨在探讨废弃混凝土细料(WCF)的二氧化碳吸收能力及其在降低混凝土对环境影响方面的作用。研究探讨了各种因素(如来源、成分和粒度分布)对 WCF 吸收二氧化碳能力的影响。通过热重分析(TGA)测量了 WCF 馏分的二氧化碳封存潜力和碳化程度。结果表明,热机械选矿产生的 WCF 对二氧化碳的吸收率最高,其次是预拌混凝土污泥产生的 WCF。这是由于这些材料中的氧化钙(CaO)含量较高,反应活性较强,而氧化钙来自水化水泥浆。不同来源和工艺的 WCF 表现出不同的化学和矿物成分,这影响了它们的二氧化碳封存能力。根据 WCF 的来源、大小和 RCA 的生产方法,WCF 的二氧化碳吸收潜力从 4.9% 到 18.2% 不等。研究表明,WCF 对二氧化碳的吸收可以抵消与混凝土生产相关的约 10-28% 的净碳足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
期刊最新文献
Mix proportion optimization for cement-based absorbent materials mixed with EP and SAP: Performance and microstructure Assessment of the CO2 sequestration potential of waste concrete fines Corrosion attack in existing reinforced concrete structures: in-field investigation and analysis of naturally corroded bars Enhancing adhesion of carbon-glass hybrid fibre-reinforced polymer tubes to seawater sea sand concrete through surface sand coating Effect of coarse recycled aggregate with embedded fibres on the mechanical properties and microstructure of polypropylene fibre-reinforced concrete
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1