Free, prior, and informed consent, local officials, and changing biodiversity governance in Hin Nam No, Laos

IF 5.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Conservation Biology Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1111/cobi.14388
Peter Bille Larsen, Chantaly Chanthavisouk
{"title":"Free, prior, and informed consent, local officials, and changing biodiversity governance in Hin Nam No, Laos","authors":"Peter Bille Larsen,&nbsp;Chantaly Chanthavisouk","doi":"10.1111/cobi.14388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) is now a globally established norm and is a condition of equitable engagement with Indigenous peoples and local communities in biodiversity conservation. However, implementation is frequently questioned in terms of its efficacy in top-down-driven governance contexts. Local officials represent core voices often absent from mainstream discourse. Conservation practices are framed by local discourses, value frameworks, and relationships that offer critical opportunities to tailor localized consent processes. Relative to an FPIC process for a prospective World Heritage Site in Hin Nam No National Park, Laos, we examined the importance of mediation by local officials in a comanagement context. The mediation led to commitments to address long-standing community grievances and reconcile conservation and development relationships in the area. Building the capacity of local officials as critical duty-bearers helped shape rights-based conservation and development outcomes. Enhancing nonconfrontational mechanisms for rights holders to air concerns and dialogue spaces for duty-bearers to respond plays a key role in this respect.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cobi.14388","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.14388","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) is now a globally established norm and is a condition of equitable engagement with Indigenous peoples and local communities in biodiversity conservation. However, implementation is frequently questioned in terms of its efficacy in top-down-driven governance contexts. Local officials represent core voices often absent from mainstream discourse. Conservation practices are framed by local discourses, value frameworks, and relationships that offer critical opportunities to tailor localized consent processes. Relative to an FPIC process for a prospective World Heritage Site in Hin Nam No National Park, Laos, we examined the importance of mediation by local officials in a comanagement context. The mediation led to commitments to address long-standing community grievances and reconcile conservation and development relationships in the area. Building the capacity of local officials as critical duty-bearers helped shape rights-based conservation and development outcomes. Enhancing nonconfrontational mechanisms for rights holders to air concerns and dialogue spaces for duty-bearers to respond plays a key role in this respect.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由、事先和知情同意、地方官员以及老挝兴南诺生物多样性治理的变化
自由、事先和知情同意(FPIC)现已成为全球公认的准则,是土著人民和当地社区公平参与生物多样性保护的条件。然而,在自上而下的治理背景下,其实施效果经常受到质疑。地方官员代表了主流话语中经常缺席的核心声音。保护实践以当地的话语、价值框架和关系为框架,为定制本地化的同意程序提供了重要机会。在老挝兴南诺国家公园的一个未来世界遗产地的 FPIC 程序中,我们考察了当地官员在共同管理背景下进行调解的重要性。通过调解,社区承诺解决长期存在的不满情绪,调和该地区的保护与发展关系。地方官员作为关键责任承担者的能力建设有助于形成基于权利的保护和发展成果。加强非对抗性机制,让权利持有者表达关切,让责任承担者提供对话空间,在这方面发挥了关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
期刊最新文献
Drivers of mangrove area change and suppression in Brazil from 2000 to 2020. Conservation and coexistence at a crossroads. Fundamental principles of the effect of habitat fragmentation on species with different movement rates. Biodiversity conservation, consistency, and Mus musculus. Association between attitudes toward wildlife and patterns of risk of human-wildlife conflict near Giant Panda National Park.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1