Using positionality and reflexivity to support equity in partnership-driven research

IF 5.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Conservation Biology Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1111/cobi.14396
Rachael Cadman, Alanna Syliboy, Michelle Saunders, Shelley Denny, Mary Denniston, Eleanor Barry, Breanna Bishop, Shannon Landovskis, Megan Bailey
{"title":"Using positionality and reflexivity to support equity in partnership-driven research","authors":"Rachael Cadman,&nbsp;Alanna Syliboy,&nbsp;Michelle Saunders,&nbsp;Shelley Denny,&nbsp;Mary Denniston,&nbsp;Eleanor Barry,&nbsp;Breanna Bishop,&nbsp;Shannon Landovskis,&nbsp;Megan Bailey","doi":"10.1111/cobi.14396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social and economic position and power shape everyone, including scientists and researchers. The way researchers do conservation science and the voices centered in the process are a result of researcher upbringing, experiences, access to resources, and values and are a manifestation of positionality. Positionality is a concept that can help one think about one's position and power in one's work. Creating a successful research partnership requires careful thinking about how equity, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility are accounted for in the research environment. We drew on our own experiences as early career, mid-career, and Indigenous researchers to explore researcher positionality and how understanding one's positionality can bring to the fore power dynamics in conservation science and research. We focused on the use of reflexive practice to recognize diverse roles and responsibilities, build strong project governance, and enrich relationships. We considered 2 large research partnerships, Apoqnmatulti'k (Mi'kmaw for <i>we help each other</i>) and the SakKijânginnaniattut Nunatsiavut Sivunitsangit (Inuttitut for <i>Sustainable Nunatsiavut Futures</i>) project, to examine moments of tension and interrogation of power and the ways in which this interrogation led to stronger relationships and better research. We advise that large transdisciplinary and cross-cultural research teams use positionality and reflexivity to explicitly make choices about power dynamics in the context of executing partnership-driven work. This can be accomplished through personal and collective interrogation of the power dynamics at play in project administration, research questions, and interpersonal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cobi.14396","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.14396","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social and economic position and power shape everyone, including scientists and researchers. The way researchers do conservation science and the voices centered in the process are a result of researcher upbringing, experiences, access to resources, and values and are a manifestation of positionality. Positionality is a concept that can help one think about one's position and power in one's work. Creating a successful research partnership requires careful thinking about how equity, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility are accounted for in the research environment. We drew on our own experiences as early career, mid-career, and Indigenous researchers to explore researcher positionality and how understanding one's positionality can bring to the fore power dynamics in conservation science and research. We focused on the use of reflexive practice to recognize diverse roles and responsibilities, build strong project governance, and enrich relationships. We considered 2 large research partnerships, Apoqnmatulti'k (Mi'kmaw for we help each other) and the SakKijânginnaniattut Nunatsiavut Sivunitsangit (Inuttitut for Sustainable Nunatsiavut Futures) project, to examine moments of tension and interrogation of power and the ways in which this interrogation led to stronger relationships and better research. We advise that large transdisciplinary and cross-cultural research teams use positionality and reflexivity to explicitly make choices about power dynamics in the context of executing partnership-driven work. This can be accomplished through personal and collective interrogation of the power dynamics at play in project administration, research questions, and interpersonal relationships.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用立场性和反思性支持以伙伴关系为导向的研究中的公平性
社会和经济地位与权力影响着每个人,包括科学家和研究人员。研究人员从事保护科学工作的方式以及在这一过程中发出的声音,是研究人员的成长经历、经验、获得资源的机会和价值观的结果,也是立场的体现。立场是一个概念,可以帮助人们思考自己在工作中的立场和权力。要建立成功的研究伙伴关系,就必须认真思考如何在研究环境中考虑公平性、多样性、包容性和可及性。我们以自己作为职业生涯早期、中期和土著研究人员的经历为基础,探讨了研究人员的地位问题,以及了解自己的地位如何能够凸显保护科学和研究中的权力动态。我们的重点是利用反思性实践来认识不同的角色和责任,建立强有力的项目管理,并丰富人际关系。我们考虑了两个大型研究合作项目,即 Apoqnmatulti'k(米克马克语,意为我们互相帮助)和 SakKijânginnaniattut Nunatsiavutut Sivunitsangit(努纳齐亚武特语,意为可持续的努纳齐亚武特未来)项目,以研究紧张和权力质询的时刻,以及这种质询如何导致更牢固的关系和更好的研究。我们建议大型跨学科和跨文化研究团队在开展合作驱动的工作时,利用立场和反思性明确做出有关权力动态的选择。这可以通过对项目管理、研究问题和人际关系中的权力动态进行个人和集体审查来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
期刊最新文献
Drivers of mangrove area change and suppression in Brazil from 2000 to 2020. Conservation and coexistence at a crossroads. Fundamental principles of the effect of habitat fragmentation on species with different movement rates. Biodiversity conservation, consistency, and Mus musculus. Association between attitudes toward wildlife and patterns of risk of human-wildlife conflict near Giant Panda National Park.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1