{"title":"Is It a Mind Game? Do Visual and Psychological Perceptions Differ Between Aesthetic Surgery Patients and Healthy Controls?","authors":"Merve Setenay Gurbuz, Asli Datli","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04540-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Aesthetic plastic surgery allows for the reshaping of the human body. Most research on aesthetic surgery has focused primarily on improving self-confidence. In this study, we aimed to assess the visual perception, body appreciation, body image quality of life, and satisfaction with life among aesthetic surgery patients, and compare these outcomes with those of healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 57 aesthetic surgery patients and 56 healthy controls, with no history of psychiatric disorders, were included in the study. All participants completed the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test (3rd Edition), the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS), the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI), and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Participants with a history of psychiatric disorders and the surgeon's own revision patients were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MVPT-3 scores were significantly lower in aesthetic surgery patients compared to healthy controls. Additionally, as the number of operations increased, MVPT-3 scores decreased. A similar trend was observed between MVPT-3 and BIQLI/BAS scores, where lower body image quality and appreciation were associated with reduced visual perception scores. Interestingly, satisfaction with life was not significantly affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluating visual perception in patients seeking multiple surgeries may help prevent negative outcomes and contribute to more positive surgical experiences.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04540-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Aesthetic plastic surgery allows for the reshaping of the human body. Most research on aesthetic surgery has focused primarily on improving self-confidence. In this study, we aimed to assess the visual perception, body appreciation, body image quality of life, and satisfaction with life among aesthetic surgery patients, and compare these outcomes with those of healthy controls.
Methods: A total of 57 aesthetic surgery patients and 56 healthy controls, with no history of psychiatric disorders, were included in the study. All participants completed the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test (3rd Edition), the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS), the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI), and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Participants with a history of psychiatric disorders and the surgeon's own revision patients were excluded.
Results: MVPT-3 scores were significantly lower in aesthetic surgery patients compared to healthy controls. Additionally, as the number of operations increased, MVPT-3 scores decreased. A similar trend was observed between MVPT-3 and BIQLI/BAS scores, where lower body image quality and appreciation were associated with reduced visual perception scores. Interestingly, satisfaction with life was not significantly affected.
Conclusion: Evaluating visual perception in patients seeking multiple surgeries may help prevent negative outcomes and contribute to more positive surgical experiences.
Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.