Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: a pattern of care analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s12883-024-03954-z
Susanne Rogers, Markus Gross, Ekin Ermis, Gizem Cosgun, Brigitta G Baumert, Thomas Mader, Christina Schroeder, Nicoletta Lomax, Sara Alonso, Adela Ademaj, Tessa Lazeroms, Seok-Yun Lee, Michael Mayinger, Christoph Mamot, Lucia Schwyzer, Gerrit A Schubert, Oliver Riesterer
{"title":"Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: a pattern of care analysis.","authors":"Susanne Rogers, Markus Gross, Ekin Ermis, Gizem Cosgun, Brigitta G Baumert, Thomas Mader, Christina Schroeder, Nicoletta Lomax, Sara Alonso, Adela Ademaj, Tessa Lazeroms, Seok-Yun Lee, Michael Mayinger, Christoph Mamot, Lucia Schwyzer, Gerrit A Schubert, Oliver Riesterer","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03954-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>90% of glioblastomas (GBM) relapse within two years of diagnosis. In contrast to the initial setting, there is no standard management for recurrent disease and options include hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (re-mHSRT). The aims of this study were to investigate re-mHSRT practice in Swiss neuro-oncology centres.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 18 questions regarding re-irradiation for GBM was created and distributed electronically (SurveyMonkey, USA) to 11 radiation oncologists in Switzerland specialising in brain tumours. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a multicentre series of patients treated with an established re-mHSRT schedule to benchmark these against the literature and investigated the radiological patterns of relapse after re-mHSRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8 of 11 (73%) radiation oncologists responded to the survey and re-irradiation practice was heterogeneous. The 10 × 3.5 Gy schedule (RTOG 1205, BRIOChe trials) was used by 5/8 respondents and 47/50 patients with recurrent GBM treated with re-mHSRT with this schedule in daily practice were included in the analysis. The median time to re-mHSRT following completion of adjuvant RT was 23.3 (7-224) months. The median PTV at re-mHSRT was 22.0 cm<sup>3</sup> (0.9-190). Combined CTV + PTV margins ranged from 0 to 10 mm and median prescription isodose was 80% (67-100). 14/47 (30%) patients received temozolomide and four (8.5%) continued bevacizumab concomitantly. On multivariable analysis, concomitant systemic therapy predicted for progression-free survival (PFS), HR 2.87 (95% CI 1-03-7.96), p = 0.042. Median PFS following re-mHSRT was 6.6 (0.2-92.5) months and 26/47 patients (55%) received subsequent systemic therapy. The median overall survival (OS) following recurrence was 11.8 months (1.5-92.5), similar to the 10.8 months in the literature with the same schedule. The six-month OS rate was 37/47 (79%), which compares well with the 73% reported in a meta-analysis of 50 publications employing various schedules. In a subgroup analysis of 36/47 (79%) patients with MR follow-up after re-mHSRT, 8/36 (22%) had no radiological evidence of tumour progression at a median follow-up of 9.4 months. 21/28 (75%) radiological relapses were in-field, two were marginal and five were out of field.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Re-mHSRT with 10 × 3.5 Gy can achieve local control in selected patients with recurrent GBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"24 1","pages":"462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03954-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: 90% of glioblastomas (GBM) relapse within two years of diagnosis. In contrast to the initial setting, there is no standard management for recurrent disease and options include hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (re-mHSRT). The aims of this study were to investigate re-mHSRT practice in Swiss neuro-oncology centres.

Methods: A survey of 18 questions regarding re-irradiation for GBM was created and distributed electronically (SurveyMonkey, USA) to 11 radiation oncologists in Switzerland specialising in brain tumours. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a multicentre series of patients treated with an established re-mHSRT schedule to benchmark these against the literature and investigated the radiological patterns of relapse after re-mHSRT.

Results: 8 of 11 (73%) radiation oncologists responded to the survey and re-irradiation practice was heterogeneous. The 10 × 3.5 Gy schedule (RTOG 1205, BRIOChe trials) was used by 5/8 respondents and 47/50 patients with recurrent GBM treated with re-mHSRT with this schedule in daily practice were included in the analysis. The median time to re-mHSRT following completion of adjuvant RT was 23.3 (7-224) months. The median PTV at re-mHSRT was 22.0 cm3 (0.9-190). Combined CTV + PTV margins ranged from 0 to 10 mm and median prescription isodose was 80% (67-100). 14/47 (30%) patients received temozolomide and four (8.5%) continued bevacizumab concomitantly. On multivariable analysis, concomitant systemic therapy predicted for progression-free survival (PFS), HR 2.87 (95% CI 1-03-7.96), p = 0.042. Median PFS following re-mHSRT was 6.6 (0.2-92.5) months and 26/47 patients (55%) received subsequent systemic therapy. The median overall survival (OS) following recurrence was 11.8 months (1.5-92.5), similar to the 10.8 months in the literature with the same schedule. The six-month OS rate was 37/47 (79%), which compares well with the 73% reported in a meta-analysis of 50 publications employing various schedules. In a subgroup analysis of 36/47 (79%) patients with MR follow-up after re-mHSRT, 8/36 (22%) had no radiological evidence of tumour progression at a median follow-up of 9.4 months. 21/28 (75%) radiological relapses were in-field, two were marginal and five were out of field.

Conclusions: Re-mHSRT with 10 × 3.5 Gy can achieve local control in selected patients with recurrent GBM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性胶质母细胞瘤的再放射治疗:护理模式分析。
背景:90%的胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)会在确诊后两年内复发。与最初的情况不同,复发疾病没有标准的治疗方法,可供选择的方案包括低分次立体定向再照射(re-mHSRT)。本研究旨在调查瑞士神经肿瘤中心的再立体定向放射治疗实践:方法:我们制作了一份包含 18 个问题的有关 GBM 再照射的调查表,并通过电子方式(SurveyMonkey,美国)分发给瑞士 11 位脑肿瘤放射肿瘤专家。我们评估了一个多中心系列患者的临床疗效,这些患者接受了既定的再放疗计划,以文献为基准,并调查了再放疗后复发的放射学模式:11位放射肿瘤学家中有8位(73%)对调查做出了回应,再照射的做法不尽相同。5/8的受访者使用10 × 3.5 Gy计划(RTOG 1205、BRIOChe试验),47/50的复发性GBM患者在日常实践中使用该计划接受了再放疗。在完成辅助 RT 后,再次接受 MHSRT 的中位时间为 23.3(7-224)个月。再次MHSRT时的PTV中位数为22.0 cm3(0.9-190)。CTV+PTV联合边缘为0至10毫米,处方等剂量中位数为80%(67-100)。14/47(30%)名患者接受了替莫唑胺治疗,4(8.5%)名患者继续同时使用贝伐单抗。经多变量分析,同时接受系统治疗可预测无进展生存期(PFS),HR 2.87 (95% CI 1-03-7.96),P = 0.042。再次接受MHSRT治疗后的中位生存期为6.6(0.2-92.5)个月,26/47名患者(55%)接受了后续系统治疗。复发后的中位总生存期(OS)为11.8个月(1.5-92.5),与文献中相同疗程的10.8个月相似。6个月的OS率为37/47(79%),与采用不同方案的50篇文献的荟萃分析报告的73%相近。在对36/47(79%)名在再次接受MHSRT后接受MR随访的患者进行的亚组分析中,8/36(22%)名患者在中位随访9.4个月时没有肿瘤进展的放射学证据。21/28(75%)例放射学复发为场内复发,2例为边缘复发,5例为场外复发:结论:对选定的复发性 GBM 患者,使用 10 × 3.5 Gy 的再 mHSRT 可以达到局部控制的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Association of blood pressure parameters on early neurological deterioration in patients with mild stroke and large vessel occlusion following medical management. Correction: The relationship of acute delirium with cognitive and psychiatric symptoms after stroke: a longitudinal study. Exploring the effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula in the neurointensive care unit: a prospective observational study. Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery versus small bone window craniotomy for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Isolated oculomotor nerve palsy due to mesencephalic infarction diagnosed by ZOOM DWI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1