Facilitating workplace learning in clinical practice, an evaluation among medical specialists.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2425040
Mijke Kerperien, Monica H M Verkooijen, Richard T Supheert, Cornelia R M G Fluit, Jeroen van Dillen
{"title":"Facilitating workplace learning in clinical practice, an evaluation among medical specialists.","authors":"Mijke Kerperien, Monica H M Verkooijen, Richard T Supheert, Cornelia R M G Fluit, Jeroen van Dillen","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2425040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Training of medical students, interns and residents (junior professionals, JP) happens predominantly through workplace learning. This is supported by medical specialists (MS) and varies by MS, workplace, medical specialty, and social context. This study aimed to gain insights into the facilitation of workplace learning in clinical practice by MS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with MS at the gynaecology and paediatrics department in an academic and three non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants were purposively sampled to be involved in the training of JP. Transcribed interviews were thematically analysed to describe facilitators and barriers for workplace learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workplace learning was interpreted as a broad concept, with some MS acknowledging its occurrence beyond created opportunities. Four themes revealed facilitators and barriers related to <i>(</i>1<i>) Connection and alignment, (</i>2<i>) Attitude, (</i>3<i>) Organizational and learning dynamics,</i> and <i>(</i>4<i>) Policy and Logistics.</i> Our research suggests MS' beliefs and awareness regarding workplace learning guide their ability to recognize and utilize learning moments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the importance of a work environment for MS that is founded on interpersonal relationships, supportive logistics of healthcare institutions and a culture of active involvement within the team, all of which are essential for recognizing and utilizing learning opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2425040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Training of medical students, interns and residents (junior professionals, JP) happens predominantly through workplace learning. This is supported by medical specialists (MS) and varies by MS, workplace, medical specialty, and social context. This study aimed to gain insights into the facilitation of workplace learning in clinical practice by MS.

Method: Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with MS at the gynaecology and paediatrics department in an academic and three non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants were purposively sampled to be involved in the training of JP. Transcribed interviews were thematically analysed to describe facilitators and barriers for workplace learning.

Results: Workplace learning was interpreted as a broad concept, with some MS acknowledging its occurrence beyond created opportunities. Four themes revealed facilitators and barriers related to (1) Connection and alignment, (2) Attitude, (3) Organizational and learning dynamics, and (4) Policy and Logistics. Our research suggests MS' beliefs and awareness regarding workplace learning guide their ability to recognize and utilize learning moments.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the importance of a work environment for MS that is founded on interpersonal relationships, supportive logistics of healthcare institutions and a culture of active involvement within the team, all of which are essential for recognizing and utilizing learning opportunities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进临床实践中的工作场所学习,在医学专家中进行评估。
目的:医学生、实习生和住院医师(初级专业人员,JP)的培训主要通过工作场所学习进行。这需要医学专家(MS)的支持,并因医学专家、工作场所、医学专业和社会环境的不同而有所差异。本研究旨在深入了解医学专家在临床实践中促进工作场所学习的情况:对荷兰一家学术医院和三家非学术医院妇科和儿科的医务人员进行了 13 次半结构式访谈。参与访谈者均为参与过太平绅士培训的人员。对访谈记录进行了主题分析,以描述工作场所学习的促进因素和障碍:结果:工作场所学习被解释为一个广泛的概念,一些医务人员承认其发生超出了创造的机会。四个主题揭示了与以下方面有关的促进因素和障碍:(1) 联系和协调,(2) 态度,(3) 组织和学习动力,以及 (4) 政策和后勤。我们的研究表明,MS 对工作场所学习的信念和认识指导着他们识别和利用学习时机的能力:我们的研究结果强调了建立在人际关系、医疗保健机构的支持性后勤以及团队内部积极参与文化基础上的 MS 工作环境的重要性,所有这些对于识别和利用学习机会至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
A randomised cross-over trial assessing the impact of AI-generated individual feedback on written online assignments for medical students. Assessing readability of explanations and reliability of answers by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in non-traumatic spinal cord injury education. Balancing innovation and tradition: A critical reflection on the assessment PROFILE framework. Response to: "Rethinking peer evaluation in team-based learning". Response to: 'A confidentiality conundrum: Case tracking for medical education'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1