Care pathways for individuals with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (CaPIADoC): an inter-society Consensus Conference.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07875-0
Anna Estraneo, Alfonso Magliacano, Francesco De Bellis, Aldo Amantini, Susanna Lavezzi, Antonello Grippo
{"title":"Care pathways for individuals with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (CaPIADoC): an inter-society Consensus Conference.","authors":"Anna Estraneo, Alfonso Magliacano, Francesco De Bellis, Aldo Amantini, Susanna Lavezzi, Antonello Grippo","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07875-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate recognition of consciousness level and detection of neurological complications since the intensive care unit are crucial for an appropriate prognostication and tailored treatment in patients with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (DoC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present inter-society Consensus Conference aimed at addressing current debates on diagnostic and prognostic procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve working groups involving 22 multidisciplinary professionals (membership of 9 Scientific Societies and 2 patients' family Associations) conducted a systematic literature review focused on 12 questions addressing diagnosis (n = 5) and prognosis (n = 7). The quality of evidence of the included studies was evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. A Jury involving Scientific Societies and patients' family Associations provided recommendations based on the evidence levels and expert opinion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An overall number of 1,219 papers was screened, and 21 were included in the review. Working groups produced a report on strengths and limits of evidence for each question. The overall suggestion was to use a multimodal assessment combining validated clinical scales, neurophysiological exams, and neuroimaging in diagnostic and prognostic procedure, to guide personalized treatment. A strong recommendation was to use standardized terminologies and diagnostic criteria for ensuring homogeneity and appropriateness in patients management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multidisciplinary Consensus Conference provided the first operational recommendations for a good clinical practice procedure for patients with post-anoxic DoC. A periodic review will be necessary based on future evidence from the literature and implementation of the present recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1751-1764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07875-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate recognition of consciousness level and detection of neurological complications since the intensive care unit are crucial for an appropriate prognostication and tailored treatment in patients with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (DoC).

Objective: The present inter-society Consensus Conference aimed at addressing current debates on diagnostic and prognostic procedures.

Methods: Twelve working groups involving 22 multidisciplinary professionals (membership of 9 Scientific Societies and 2 patients' family Associations) conducted a systematic literature review focused on 12 questions addressing diagnosis (n = 5) and prognosis (n = 7). The quality of evidence of the included studies was evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. A Jury involving Scientific Societies and patients' family Associations provided recommendations based on the evidence levels and expert opinion.

Results: An overall number of 1,219 papers was screened, and 21 were included in the review. Working groups produced a report on strengths and limits of evidence for each question. The overall suggestion was to use a multimodal assessment combining validated clinical scales, neurophysiological exams, and neuroimaging in diagnostic and prognostic procedure, to guide personalized treatment. A strong recommendation was to use standardized terminologies and diagnostic criteria for ensuring homogeneity and appropriateness in patients management.

Conclusion: This multidisciplinary Consensus Conference provided the first operational recommendations for a good clinical practice procedure for patients with post-anoxic DoC. A periodic review will be necessary based on future evidence from the literature and implementation of the present recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缺氧后意识障碍患者的护理路径(CaPIADoC):学会间共识会议。
背景:自重症监护室开始,准确识别意识水平和检测神经系统并发症对于缺氧后意识障碍(DoC)患者的适当预后和针对性治疗至关重要:在重症监护室准确识别意识水平和发现神经系统并发症对于缺氧后意识障碍(DoC)患者的预后和针对性治疗至关重要:本次学会间共识会议旨在解决当前关于诊断和预后程序的争论:由 22 名多学科专业人员(9 个科学协会和 2 个患者家属协会的成员)组成的 12 个工作组对 12 个涉及诊断(5 个)和预后(7 个)的问题进行了系统的文献综述。纳入研究的证据质量采用牛津循证医学中心证据等级标准进行评估。由科学协会和患者家庭协会组成的评审团根据证据等级和专家意见提出建议:结果:共筛选出 1,219 篇论文,其中 21 篇被纳入审查范围。工作组就每个问题的证据优势和局限性编写了一份报告。总体建议是在诊断和预后程序中结合使用有效的临床量表、神经生理学检查和神经影像学检查等多模式评估,以指导个性化治疗。会议强烈建议使用标准化术语和诊断标准,以确保患者管理的一致性和适当性:此次多学科共识会议为缺氧后DoC患者的良好临床实践程序提供了首批操作建议。有必要根据未来的文献证据和当前建议的实施情况进行定期审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Dynamic 18 F-FDG PET to detect differences among patients with progressive and relapsing multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. microRNA in ALS: finally ready for prime time? Clinical relapse after 52 years in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Exploring dysregulated miRNAs in ALS: implications for disease pathogenesis and early diagnosis. Care pathways for individuals with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (CaPIADoC): an inter-society Consensus Conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1