A Comparative Study of Auditory Processing and Working Memory Profiles in Young and Older Adults.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY American Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1044/2024_AJA-24-00069
Vaishnavi Ramadas, Ramya Vaidyanath, Ajith Kumar Uppunda, Sushma Viswanathan
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Auditory Processing and Working Memory Profiles in Young and Older Adults.","authors":"Vaishnavi Ramadas, Ramya Vaidyanath, Ajith Kumar Uppunda, Sushma Viswanathan","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJA-24-00069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to profile and compare the auditory processing and working memory skills of young and older adults with near-normal hearing thresholds (up to 2000 Hz) and cognition. This was done to investigate the effect of aging on these skills despite exhibiting near-normal peripheral hearing in low frequencies and normal cognitive skills.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-five young adults (18 to 35 years) and 35 older adults (56 to 79 years) were recruited for the study. They were screened for near-normal hearing thresholds (up to 2000 Hz) as well as cognition, and written informed consent was obtained. A battery of auditory processing and working memory tests were administered to the participants. The responses obtained were compared using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also carried out to examine any relationship between the various auditory processes and the cognitive skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The young adults had superior performance compared to older adults on most of the tasks. PCA revealed the influence of working memory on performance in most tests of auditory processing in young adults and to a lesser extent in older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study aimed to assess and compare the auditory processing and working memory skills of young and older adults with normal hearing and cognition. Overall, young adults demonstrated superior performance compared to older adults across the tasks. The results of PCA indicated that the young adults utilized their cognitive resources better for auditory processing compared to the older adults. These findings suggest a need for tailored interventions targeting both auditory processing and working memory, especially among older adults, and highlight the importance of considering age-related differences in these cognitive processes when interpreting auditory processing assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJA-24-00069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to profile and compare the auditory processing and working memory skills of young and older adults with near-normal hearing thresholds (up to 2000 Hz) and cognition. This was done to investigate the effect of aging on these skills despite exhibiting near-normal peripheral hearing in low frequencies and normal cognitive skills.

Method: Twenty-five young adults (18 to 35 years) and 35 older adults (56 to 79 years) were recruited for the study. They were screened for near-normal hearing thresholds (up to 2000 Hz) as well as cognition, and written informed consent was obtained. A battery of auditory processing and working memory tests were administered to the participants. The responses obtained were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also carried out to examine any relationship between the various auditory processes and the cognitive skills.

Results: The young adults had superior performance compared to older adults on most of the tasks. PCA revealed the influence of working memory on performance in most tests of auditory processing in young adults and to a lesser extent in older adults.

Conclusions: This study aimed to assess and compare the auditory processing and working memory skills of young and older adults with normal hearing and cognition. Overall, young adults demonstrated superior performance compared to older adults across the tasks. The results of PCA indicated that the young adults utilized their cognitive resources better for auditory processing compared to the older adults. These findings suggest a need for tailored interventions targeting both auditory processing and working memory, especially among older adults, and highlight the importance of considering age-related differences in these cognitive processes when interpreting auditory processing assessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻人和老年人听觉处理和工作记忆特征比较研究
目的:本研究旨在对听力阈值(2000赫兹以下)和认知能力接近正常的年轻人和老年人的听觉处理和工作记忆能力进行剖析和比较。这样做是为了研究在低频外周听力接近正常和认知能力正常的情况下,衰老对这些能力的影响:研究招募了 25 名年轻人(18 至 35 岁)和 35 名老年人(56 至 79 岁)。对他们进行了听力阈值(2000赫兹以下)和认知能力近乎正常的筛查,并获得了书面知情同意。研究人员对参与者进行了一系列听觉处理和工作记忆测试。测试结果采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行比较。此外,还进行了主成分分析(PCA),以研究各种听觉过程与认知技能之间的关系:与老年人相比,年轻人在大多数任务中的表现都更出色。PCA显示,在大多数听觉处理测试中,工作记忆对年轻人的成绩有影响,而对老年人的影响较小:本研究旨在评估和比较听力和认知能力正常的年轻人和老年人的听觉处理和工作记忆能力。总体而言,与老年人相比,年轻人在各项任务中的表现都更胜一筹。PCA 的结果表明,与老年人相比,年轻人能更好地利用认知资源进行听觉处理。这些研究结果表明,有必要针对听觉处理和工作记忆进行有针对性的干预,尤其是在老年人中,并强调了在解释听觉处理评估时考虑这些认知过程中与年龄有关的差异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Auditory Processing and Working Memory Profiles in Young and Older Adults. Investigation of Presentation Levels for Optimal Use of NU-6 Ordered by Difficulty Version II Word Lists. Effects of Noise Exposure on Video Ocular Counter Roll Measurements. Influence of Matching the Processing Delays of Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Devices for Bimodal Listeners on Speech Recognition in Noise. Unlocking the Potential of Pediatric Virtual Care: An e-Delphi Study on a Virtual Caregiver Participation Framework in Audiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1