首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Audiology最新文献

英文 中文
Bimodal Neuromodulation for Tinnitus in a Clinical Practice Setting: Clinically Significant Benefit for Patients With Moderate or Worse Symptoms. 双峰神经调节治疗耳鸣的临床实践:对中度或更严重症状患者的临床显著益处
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00090
Craig A Kasper, Juliana M May, Natalie E Crossland, Hubert H Lim

Purpose: Controlled clinical trials demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new treatments, but real-world outcomes may vary due to patient diversity and treatment variations. Tinnitus, affecting 10%-15% of the population, is a major health concern. Lenire, a bimodal neuromodulation treatment combining sound and tongue stimulations, has shown safety and effectiveness in clinical trials. This study presents the first real-world evidence (RWE) from a U.S. cohort that investigates tinnitus subgroup severities, providing further assessment of Lenire's use in clinical practice.

Method: A single-site, single-arm chart review of 140 patients treated between May 1, 2023, and January 19, 2024, was conducted. Patients were prescribed Lenire for up to 60 min daily and attended follow-ups at 6 and 12 weeks.

Results: This is the first study in a U.S. cohort to show results consistent with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling of Lenire, where positive therapeutic outcomes were achieved in patients with moderate or worse tinnitus severity as measured by the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). In this bothered tinnitus group, 81.8% (95% CI [70.9%, 89.3%]) achieved a clinically significant response (THI improvement ≥ 7 points) to treatment, with a mean reduction of -23.8 ± 2.3 points after only 12 weeks of treatment. In contrast, when providing Lenire treatment to tinnitus patients with less bothersome tinnitus (i.e., slight and mild categories), nearly zero change in score, on average, was observed after treatment. Additionally, responder rates based on an alternative threshold of at least an 11-point reduction in THI score show a high response to treatment even with this stricter minimal clinically important difference criterion, with 71.2% (95% CI [59.4%, 80.7%]) of the participants meeting or exceeding the threshold. Similar results were observed when using an alternative threshold based on an intrasubject percent improvement, defined as a reduction of at least 15% from each participant's THI score at the initial assessment.

Conclusions: Real-world data support Lenire's clinical benefits for patients with moderate or more severe tinnitus and demonstrate consistency with clinical trial results that led to FDA approval. These findings further confirm its successful integration into standard audiology care. Ongoing RWE collection will help identify the most responsive patients and guide tailored treatments.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31028449.

目的:对照临床试验证明了新疗法的安全性和有效性,但实际结果可能因患者多样性和治疗方法的变化而有所不同。耳鸣影响着10%-15%的人口,是一个主要的健康问题。Lenire是一种结合声音和舌头刺激的双峰神经调节疗法,在临床试验中显示出安全性和有效性。本研究提供了来自美国研究耳鸣亚组严重程度的第一个真实世界证据(RWE),为Lenire在临床实践中的应用提供了进一步的评估。方法:对2023年5月1日至2024年1月19日期间接受治疗的140例患者进行单点单臂图表回顾。患者每天服用Lenire长达60分钟,并在第6周和第12周进行随访。结果:这是美国队列研究中首次显示与美国食品和药物管理局(FDA) Lenire标签一致的结果,其中根据耳鸣障碍清单(THI)测量的中度或更严重耳鸣严重程度的患者取得了积极的治疗结果。在这个困扰性耳鸣组中,81.8% (95% CI[70.9%, 89.3%])的患者对治疗取得了临床显著的反应(THI改善≥7分),仅在治疗12周后平均降低-23.8±2.3分。相比之下,在对不太麻烦的耳鸣患者(即轻微和轻度类别)进行Lenire治疗时,治疗后平均评分几乎为零变化。此外,即使采用更严格的最小临床重要差异标准,基于THI评分至少降低11分的替代阈值的应答率也显示出对治疗的高反应,71.2% (95% CI[59.4%, 80.7%])的参与者达到或超过阈值。当使用基于受试者内部改善百分比的替代阈值时,观察到类似的结果,定义为每个参与者在初始评估时的THI分数至少减少15%。结论:实际数据支持Lenire对中度或重度耳鸣患者的临床益处,并证明与FDA批准的临床试验结果一致。这些发现进一步证实了其成功融入标准听力学护理。正在进行的RWE收集将有助于确定最敏感的患者并指导量身定制的治疗。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31028449。
{"title":"Bimodal Neuromodulation for Tinnitus in a Clinical Practice Setting: Clinically Significant Benefit for Patients With Moderate or Worse Symptoms.","authors":"Craig A Kasper, Juliana M May, Natalie E Crossland, Hubert H Lim","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Controlled clinical trials demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new treatments, but real-world outcomes may vary due to patient diversity and treatment variations. Tinnitus, affecting 10%-15% of the population, is a major health concern. Lenire, a bimodal neuromodulation treatment combining sound and tongue stimulations, has shown safety and effectiveness in clinical trials. This study presents the first real-world evidence (RWE) from a U.S. cohort that investigates tinnitus subgroup severities, providing further assessment of Lenire's use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-site, single-arm chart review of 140 patients treated between May 1, 2023, and January 19, 2024, was conducted. Patients were prescribed Lenire for up to 60 min daily and attended follow-ups at 6 and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This is the first study in a U.S. cohort to show results consistent with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling of Lenire, where positive therapeutic outcomes were achieved in patients with moderate or worse tinnitus severity as measured by the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). In this bothered tinnitus group, 81.8% (95% CI [70.9%, 89.3%]) achieved a clinically significant response (THI improvement ≥ 7 points) to treatment, with a mean reduction of -23.8 ± 2.3 points after only 12 weeks of treatment. In contrast, when providing Lenire treatment to tinnitus patients with less bothersome tinnitus (i.e., slight and mild categories), nearly zero change in score, on average, was observed after treatment. Additionally, responder rates based on an alternative threshold of at least an 11-point reduction in THI score show a high response to treatment even with this stricter minimal clinically important difference criterion, with 71.2% (95% CI [59.4%, 80.7%]) of the participants meeting or exceeding the threshold. Similar results were observed when using an alternative threshold based on an intrasubject percent improvement, defined as a reduction of at least 15% from each participant's THI score at the initial assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-world data support Lenire's clinical benefits for patients with moderate or more severe tinnitus and demonstrate consistency with clinical trial results that led to FDA approval. These findings further confirm its successful integration into standard audiology care. Ongoing RWE collection will help identify the most responsive patients and guide tailored treatments.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31028449.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Audiologist Dispersion and Workforce Sufficiency in Texas: A Public Health Investigation. 德克萨斯州听力学家的分散和劳动力充足:一项公共卫生调查。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00023
Anna Marie Jilla, Laura Coco, Peter Z Hansen, Kelsey D Spencer, Lindsey E Sanford, Denilson G Calderon, Connie L Howard, Heather N Reading

Purpose: Limited access to qualified professionals prevents children and adults with hearing loss from receiving timely care needed to mitigate the insidious impacts of hearing loss. Previous studies note the U.S. audiology workforce (~14,400 in 2022) is insufficient for meeting the growing hearing health care needs of the American population. The objective of the present study is to characterize the geographic dispersion of audiologists in Texas and to compare sufficiency using various benchmarks for identifying hearing health care shortage areas in the state.

Method: For each of the 254 Texas counties, geographic hearing health accessibility was assessed as a binary outcome (sufficient, insufficient) using three published provider-to-population ratio benchmarks (1:3,500 [primary care physicians]; 1:5,000 [dentists]; and 1:10,000 [educational audiologists]). Workforce sufficiency of licensed audiologists was then compared across Texas public health service regions (PHSRs), rurality categories, and U.S.-Mexico border designations.

Results: Results indicated that the audiologist workforce in Texas is insufficient to meet the hearing health care needs of the population in 96% of counties (244 of the 254). Most PHSRs were understaffed, with the exception of select counties in the Dallas metro area. Access to licensed audiologists was consistently limited, regardless of rurality or proximity to the U.S.-Mexico border.

Conclusions: The audiology workforce in Texas is insufficient to meet the hearing health care needs of the population. State-level public health, regulatory, and educational policies should prioritize addressing workforce shortages and audiology "deserts." Provision of audiology services via telehealth also represents a promising strategy for improving access in areas where no provider is present.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30781130.

目的:获得合格专业人员的机会有限,使听力损失的儿童和成人无法及时获得减轻听力损失潜在影响所需的护理。先前的研究指出,美国听力学从业人员(到2022年约为14,400人)不足以满足美国人口日益增长的听力保健需求。本研究的目的是表征德克萨斯州听力学家的地理分布,并使用各种基准来比较充分性,以确定该州听力卫生保健短缺地区。方法:对德克萨斯州254个县中的每一个县,使用三个已公布的提供者与人口比例基准(1:35 500[初级保健医生];1:5 000[牙医];1:10 000[教育听力学家]),以二元结果(充足或不足)评估地理听力健康可及性。然后比较了德克萨斯州公共卫生服务区域(PHSRs)、农村类别和美墨边境指定的持牌听力学家的劳动力充足性。结果:结果表明,听力学家的人力资源不足以满足人口的听力保健需求在96%的县(244的254)德克萨斯州。除了达拉斯市区的一些特定县外,大多数医疗服务中心都人手不足。无论在乡村或靠近美墨边境,接触有执照的听力学家一直受到限制。结论:德克萨斯州的听力学人员不足以满足人口的听力保健需求。州级公共卫生、监管和教育政策应优先解决劳动力短缺和听力学“沙漠”问题。通过远程保健提供听力学服务也是一种很有前途的战略,可以改善没有提供者的地区的获取机会。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30781130。
{"title":"Audiologist Dispersion and Workforce Sufficiency in Texas: A Public Health Investigation.","authors":"Anna Marie Jilla, Laura Coco, Peter Z Hansen, Kelsey D Spencer, Lindsey E Sanford, Denilson G Calderon, Connie L Howard, Heather N Reading","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Limited access to qualified professionals prevents children and adults with hearing loss from receiving timely care needed to mitigate the insidious impacts of hearing loss. Previous studies note the U.S. audiology workforce (~14,400 in 2022) is insufficient for meeting the growing hearing health care needs of the American population. The objective of the present study is to characterize the geographic dispersion of audiologists in Texas and to compare sufficiency using various benchmarks for identifying hearing health care shortage areas in the state.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For each of the 254 Texas counties, geographic hearing health accessibility was assessed as a binary outcome (sufficient, insufficient) using three published provider-to-population ratio benchmarks (1:3,500 [primary care physicians]; 1:5,000 [dentists]; and 1:10,000 [educational audiologists]). Workforce sufficiency of licensed audiologists was then compared across Texas public health service regions (PHSRs), rurality categories, and U.S.-Mexico border designations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that the audiologist workforce in Texas is insufficient to meet the hearing health care needs of the population in 96% of counties (244 of the 254). Most PHSRs were understaffed, with the exception of select counties in the Dallas metro area. Access to licensed audiologists was consistently limited, regardless of rurality or proximity to the U.S.-Mexico border.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The audiology workforce in Texas is insufficient to meet the hearing health care needs of the population. State-level public health, regulatory, and educational policies should prioritize addressing workforce shortages and audiology \"deserts.\" Provision of audiology services via telehealth also represents a promising strategy for improving access in areas where no provider is present.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30781130.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Apple AirPods Pro 2 Live Listen as an Assistive Listening Device. 苹果AirPods Pro 2 Live Listen作为辅助听力设备。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00156
Mehdi Foroogozar, Travis Seideman, Julie Liss, Visar Berisha

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of the Apple AirPods Pro 2 Live Listen feature on speech recognition and recall in noise among older adults in a controlled laboratory setting.

Method: Twenty adults aged 60-90+ years completed a modified speech-in-noise task with and without AirPods using the Live Listen feature. A Quick Speech-in-Noise Test-derived task measured recognition and recall under both conditions. Participants also completed audiometric screening, working memory assessment, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss estimation. Paired t tests and multiple regression analyses were used to assess performance differences and predictors.

Results: Participants demonstrated significantly higher speech recognition (p < .00001) and recall (p = .00023) when using Live Listen. Recognition improvements were predicted by age, SNR loss, and sex, while recall improvements showed no significant predictors.

Conclusions: The Live Listen feature of the Apple AirPods Pro 2 significantly improved speech-in-noise performance in older adults. These preliminary findings support its potential as an affordable assistive tool in noisy environments, such as hospitals, where traditional hearing aids may be unavailable.

目的:本研究的目的是在受控的实验室环境中评估Apple AirPods Pro 2 Live Listen功能对老年人在噪音中语音识别和记忆的好处。方法:20名年龄在60-90岁以上的成年人使用Live Listen功能完成了一项带有或不带有AirPods的改进噪音语音任务。一个快速语音噪声测试衍生的任务测量了在两种条件下的识别和回忆。参与者还完成了听力筛查、工作记忆评估和信噪比损失估计。配对t检验和多元回归分析用于评估表现差异和预测因素。结果:使用Live Listen时,参与者表现出更高的语音识别(p < 0.00001)和回忆(p = 0.0023)。年龄、信噪比损失和性别可以预测识别能力的提高,而回忆能力的提高没有显著的预测因素。结论:苹果AirPods Pro 2的实时收听功能显著改善了老年人的噪音语音表现。这些初步研究结果支持了它在嘈杂环境(如医院)中作为一种负担得起的辅助工具的潜力,在这些环境中可能无法获得传统的助听器。
{"title":"Apple AirPods Pro 2 Live Listen as an Assistive Listening Device.","authors":"Mehdi Foroogozar, Travis Seideman, Julie Liss, Visar Berisha","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00156","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00156","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of the Apple AirPods Pro 2 Live Listen feature on speech recognition and recall in noise among older adults in a controlled laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty adults aged 60-90+ years completed a modified speech-in-noise task with and without AirPods using the Live Listen feature. A Quick Speech-in-Noise Test-derived task measured recognition and recall under both conditions. Participants also completed audiometric screening, working memory assessment, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss estimation. Paired <i>t</i> tests and multiple regression analyses were used to assess performance differences and predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants demonstrated significantly higher speech recognition (<i>p</i> < .00001) and recall (<i>p</i> = .00023) when using Live Listen. Recognition improvements were predicted by age, SNR loss, and sex, while recall improvements showed no significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Live Listen feature of the Apple AirPods Pro 2 significantly improved speech-in-noise performance in older adults. These preliminary findings support its potential as an affordable assistive tool in noisy environments, such as hospitals, where traditional hearing aids may be unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes From an Interprofessional Preschool Hearing Health Education Program. 一个跨专业学前听力健康教育项目的结果。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00203
Yula C Serpanos, Susan Hendler Lederer

Purpose: Outcomes from an interprofessional preschool hearing health education curriculum, Love My Ears (LME), are presented. LME was developed by an audiologist, speech-language pathologist, and early childhood educator and was presented previously. The importance and efficacy of early hearing health education are discussed.

Method: LME was delivered as a 5-week pull-out program for three separate groups of six children each (total = 18) in a preschool educational setting. Three broad concept areas were taught: sound/hearing, volume/sound safety, and steps for hearing protection. Postprogram assessments were conducted and reported for 15 children (Mage = 4.9 years). The assessment evaluated knowledge of 12 concepts within the three broad concept areas. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the efficacy of the LME program. The number and percentage of children that correctly identified each of the concept items were tallied. A correct overall response of 80% or greater was considered indicative of the successful achievement of a concept item.

Results: Outcomes revealed the greatest accuracy (≥ 80%) in descriptive concepts related to sound/hearing (2/4), volume/sound safety (2/4), and hearing protection (4/4), supporting the efficacy of preschool hearing health education. Topic-specific vocabulary was less well learned.

Conclusion: These outcomes revealed that hearing health education using a specifically designed interprofessional curriculum such as LME is effective in a preschool population.

目的:介绍跨专业学前听力健康教育课程“爱我的耳朵”(LME)的效果。LME是由一名听力学家、语言病理学家和早期儿童教育家共同开发的,并在之前提出过。讨论了早期听力健康教育的重要性和效果。方法:在学前教育环境中,LME作为一个为期5周的退出计划,在三组不同的儿童中进行,每组6名儿童(总数= 18)。教授了三个广泛的概念领域:声音/听力,音量/声音安全以及听力保护步骤。对15名儿童(年龄= 4.9岁)进行了项目后评估并进行了报告。该评估评估了三个广泛概念领域中的12个概念的知识。描述性统计用于评价LME方案的疗效。正确识别每个概念项目的儿童人数和百分比被统计出来。正确的总体回答达到80%或更高被认为表明成功完成了一个概念项目。结果:学龄前儿童在声音/听力(2/4)、音量/声音安全(2/4)和听力保护(4/4)相关的描述性概念中准确率最高(≥80%),支持学前听力健康教育的有效性。特定主题的词汇学得不太好。结论:这些结果表明,使用专门设计的跨专业课程(如LME)进行听力健康教育在学龄前人群中是有效的。
{"title":"Outcomes From an Interprofessional Preschool Hearing Health Education Program.","authors":"Yula C Serpanos, Susan Hendler Lederer","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Outcomes from an interprofessional preschool hearing health education curriculum, Love My Ears (LME), are presented. LME was developed by an audiologist, speech-language pathologist, and early childhood educator and was presented previously. The importance and efficacy of early hearing health education are discussed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>LME was delivered as a 5-week pull-out program for three separate groups of six children each (total = 18) in a preschool educational setting. Three broad concept areas were taught: sound/hearing, volume/sound safety, and steps for hearing protection. Postprogram assessments were conducted and reported for 15 children (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 4.9 years). The assessment evaluated knowledge of 12 concepts within the three broad concept areas. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the efficacy of the LME program. The number and percentage of children that correctly identified each of the concept items were tallied. A correct overall response of 80% or greater was considered indicative of the successful achievement of a concept item.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outcomes revealed the greatest accuracy (≥ 80%) in descriptive concepts related to sound/hearing (2/4), volume/sound safety (2/4), and hearing protection (4/4), supporting the efficacy of preschool hearing health education. Topic-specific vocabulary was less well learned.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These outcomes revealed that hearing health education using a specifically designed interprofessional curriculum such as LME is effective in a preschool population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frequency Specificity of Narrowband Chirp and 2-1-2 Stimuli: Spectral Analyses. 窄带啁啾和2-1-2刺激的频率特异性:频谱分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00145
Ronald Adjekum, Susan A Small, Sylvia Chan, David R Stapells

Purpose: Narrowband (NB) chirps have recently been of great interest in audiology for the electrophysiological assessment of hearing in infants, but clinicians have little information about these new stimuli and how they compare to more standard stimuli, such as 2-1-2-cycle tones. The current study examined the frequency specificity of NB chirps by comparing the spectral characteristics of 500-, 1000-, 2000-, and 4000-Hz NB CE-Chirp LS ("level-specific" version) stimuli with those of the 2-1-2 tones.

Method: Spectral characteristics, including center frequency (CF), bandwidth, and stimulus energy changes after stopband filtering, were compared. Bandwidth was computed as the difference between the upper and lower frequencies at the -20 and -3 dB cutoff points of the main lobe; CF was determined as the geometric mean of the upper and lower frequencies at the -20 and -3 dB cutoff points.

Results: At 100 dB peSPL, the bandwidths of the 500-, 1000-, and 2000-Hz NB CE-Chirp LS acoustic spectra were 1.8-1.9 times wider than those of the acoustic spectra for the 2-1-2 tones; the 4000-Hz NB CE-Chirp LS bandwidths were 1.4-1.5 times wider than those of the 2-1-2 tones. The energy of the NB CE-Chirp LS stimuli was concentrated within ±0.75 octave of the CF, compared to ±0.5 octave for 2-1-2 tones. These spectral characteristics did not change with stimulus intensity.

Conclusions: The NB CE-Chirp LS stimuli demonstrated poorer frequency specificity compared with that of the 2-1-2 tones. NB-chirp thresholds may therefore underestimate true thresholds, especially in steeply sloping hearing loss. Further studies are needed to investigate the cochlear place specificity of auditory brainstem responses to the NB CE-Chirp LS stimuli before recommending them for clinical use.

目的:窄带(NB)啁啾最近在听力学中引起了很大的兴趣,用于婴儿听力的电生理评估,但临床医生对这些新的刺激以及它们与更标准的刺激(如2-1-2周期音)的比较知之甚少。目前的研究通过比较500、1000、2000和4000 hz的NB CE-Chirp LS(“电平特异性”版本)刺激与2-1-2音调刺激的频谱特征,检验了NB啁啾的频率特异性。方法:比较经阻带滤波后的中心频率(CF)、带宽、刺激能量变化等频谱特性。带宽计算为主瓣-20和-3 dB截止点的上下频率之差;CF被确定为在-20和-3 dB截止点的上下频率的几何平均值。结果:100 dB peSPL下,500、1000、2000 hz NB CE-Chirp LS谱宽为2-1-2音调谱宽的1.8 ~ 1.9倍;4000 hz NB - CE-Chirp LS带宽比2-1-2音调宽1.4-1.5倍。NB - CE-Chirp LS刺激的能量集中在CF的±0.75倍频内,而2-1-2音调刺激的能量集中在CF的±0.5倍频内。这些光谱特征不随刺激强度的变化而变化。结论:与2-1-2音调相比,NB - CE-Chirp LS刺激表现出较差的频率特异性。因此,nb啁啾阈值可能低估了真实阈值,特别是在听力损失急剧下降的情况下。在推荐NB - CE-Chirp LS刺激用于临床之前,需要进一步研究听觉脑干对耳蜗位置特异性的反应。
{"title":"Frequency Specificity of Narrowband Chirp and 2-1-2 Stimuli: Spectral Analyses.","authors":"Ronald Adjekum, Susan A Small, Sylvia Chan, David R Stapells","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00145","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Narrowband (NB) chirps have recently been of great interest in audiology for the electrophysiological assessment of hearing in infants, but clinicians have little information about these new stimuli and how they compare to more standard stimuli, such as 2-1-2-cycle tones. The current study examined the frequency specificity of NB chirps by comparing the spectral characteristics of 500-, 1000-, 2000-, and 4000-Hz NB CE-Chirp LS (\"level-specific\" version) stimuli with those of the 2-1-2 tones.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Spectral characteristics, including center frequency (CF), bandwidth, and stimulus energy changes after stopband filtering, were compared. Bandwidth was computed as the difference between the upper and lower frequencies at the -20 and -3 dB cutoff points of the main lobe; CF was determined as the geometric mean of the upper and lower frequencies at the -20 and -3 dB cutoff points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 100 dB peSPL, the bandwidths of the 500-, 1000-, and 2000-Hz NB CE-Chirp LS acoustic spectra were 1.8-1.9 times wider than those of the acoustic spectra for the 2-1-2 tones; the 4000-Hz NB CE-Chirp LS bandwidths were 1.4-1.5 times wider than those of the 2-1-2 tones. The energy of the NB CE-Chirp LS stimuli was concentrated within ±0.75 octave of the CF, compared to ±0.5 octave for 2-1-2 tones. These spectral characteristics did not change with stimulus intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NB CE-Chirp LS stimuli demonstrated poorer frequency specificity compared with that of the 2-1-2 tones. NB-chirp thresholds may therefore underestimate true thresholds, especially in steeply sloping hearing loss. Further studies are needed to investigate the cochlear place specificity of auditory brainstem responses to the NB CE-Chirp LS stimuli before recommending them for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improvements in Pediatric Speech Perception in Noise Using Classifier-Based Noise Management. 使用基于分类器的噪声管理改善儿童在噪声中的语音感知。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00015
Ursula M Findlen, Alecia Jayne, Jason Benedict, Robert T Dwyer, Smita Agrawal

Purpose: The main objective of this study was to examine the effect of a classifier-based noise management algorithm (AutoSense Sky OS 3.0) on speech perception in noise in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients and to compare the speech perception outcomes with typically hearing peers.

Method: This prospective observational study included nine children (ages 9-15 years) with bilateral CIs and nine age-matched, typically hearing peers. Speech perception outcomes were measured in noise using Pediatric AzBio sentences to compare performance in the omnidirectional microphone mode with the classifier-based automatic noise management mode at four signal-to-noise ratios. Ratings of listening ease and speech clarity were recorded to obtain subjective measures of benefit. Results from the bilateral CI recipients were compared to a group of typically hearing children. Paired t tests were used to evaluate outcomes.

Results: Classifier-based noise management improved speech perception in noise compared to listening in the omnidirectional microphone mode. CI group averages revealed a 21.4 percentage point and 47.1 percentage point improvement in speech perception when using the Sky OS 3.0 algorithm at 0 and -5 dB SNR, respectively. Listening ease and speech clarity were improved when using the classifier-based noise management algorithm.

Conclusions: Pediatric CI recipients can benefit from classifier-based noise management. Given the difficult listening environments children face, especially in typical classroom settings while listening for learning, audiologists should consider activating classifier-based noise management in this population.

目的:本研究的主要目的是研究基于分类器的噪声管理算法(AutoSense Sky OS 3.0)对儿童人工耳蜗(CI)受者在噪声环境下语音感知的影响,并将其与正常听力的同龄人的语音感知结果进行比较。方法:这项前瞻性观察研究包括9名患有双侧CIs的儿童(9-15岁)和9名年龄匹配的典型听力同伴。使用儿科AzBio句子测量噪声下的语音感知结果,以比较全向麦克风模式和基于分类器的自动噪声管理模式在四种信噪比下的表现。记录听音轻松度和语音清晰度的评分,以获得主观的效益衡量。将双侧CI受者的结果与一组正常听力儿童的结果进行比较。配对t检验用于评价结果。结果:与全向麦克风模式下的聆听相比,基于分类器的噪声管理改善了噪声下的语音感知。CI组平均显示,在0和-5 dB信噪比下使用Sky OS 3.0算法时,语音感知分别提高了21.4个百分点和47.1个百分点。采用基于分类器的噪声管理算法,提高了听力的易用性和语音清晰度。结论:儿童CI受者可以从基于分类器的噪声管理中获益。考虑到儿童所面临的困难的听力环境,特别是在典型的课堂环境中,听力学家应该考虑在这一人群中启动基于分类器的噪音管理。
{"title":"Improvements in Pediatric Speech Perception in Noise Using Classifier-Based Noise Management.","authors":"Ursula M Findlen, Alecia Jayne, Jason Benedict, Robert T Dwyer, Smita Agrawal","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The main objective of this study was to examine the effect of a classifier-based noise management algorithm (AutoSense Sky OS 3.0) on speech perception in noise in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients and to compare the speech perception outcomes with typically hearing peers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective observational study included nine children (ages 9-15 years) with bilateral CIs and nine age-matched, typically hearing peers. Speech perception outcomes were measured in noise using Pediatric AzBio sentences to compare performance in the omnidirectional microphone mode with the classifier-based automatic noise management mode at four signal-to-noise ratios. Ratings of listening ease and speech clarity were recorded to obtain subjective measures of benefit. Results from the bilateral CI recipients were compared to a group of typically hearing children. Paired <i>t</i> tests were used to evaluate outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Classifier-based noise management improved speech perception in noise compared to listening in the omnidirectional microphone mode. CI group averages revealed a 21.4 percentage point and 47.1 percentage point improvement in speech perception when using the Sky OS 3.0 algorithm at 0 and -5 dB SNR, respectively. Listening ease and speech clarity were improved when using the classifier-based noise management algorithm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric CI recipients can benefit from classifier-based noise management. Given the difficult listening environments children face, especially in typical classroom settings while listening for learning, audiologists should consider activating classifier-based noise management in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145907216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Don't Assume I'm Too Old!": Assessment of Digital Literacy in a Clinical Sample of Adults With Hearing Loss. “别以为我太老了!”听力损失成人临床样本的数字素养评估。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00160
Melanie Ferguson, Talveen Sahota, Cathy Sucher

Purpose: Digital and remote technologies are commonly used in audiology, which require digital literacy skills. The study objectives were to (a) assess digital literacy in adults with hearing loss attending an audiology clinic in Australia and (b) establish the relationship of digital literacy with demographic factors.

Method: A single-center, cross-sectional survey on self-report of skill and confidence with mobile technologies using two measures (a) the validated Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire-16 items (MDPQ-16), and (b) the short two-item Digital Literacy-2Q (DL-2Q) for clinical use asking about Mobile Skill and Mobile Confidence. The study sample was adults with primarily mild-moderate hearing loss (n = 110), aged 52-96 years (M = 73.9).

Results: Age was negatively associated with MDPQ-16 scores, r(108) = -0.454, p < .001. However, in the mid-age range 65-85 years, more than twice as many participants (69.7%) had good mobile proficiency compared to those who had poorer mobile proficiency (30.3%). For the DL-2Q, the 92% who rated themselves as competent, and the 58.3% and 41.0% who rated themselves as confident or depends on task, respectively, had good MDPQ-16 scores. However, in 25% there was a mismatch between ratings of competent and confident. No other demographic factors were significantly associated with digital literacy.

Conclusions: Although age overall was a factor in digital literacy, there were many older adults attending audiology appointments who were shown to have good digital literacy, irrespective of their age. The DL-2Q is a quick and easy measure to assess digital literacy in audiology clinics. This can help to ensure that age is not barrier to remote hearing health technologies, which should be accessible to all those who would benefit.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30853604.

目的:数字和远程技术通常用于听力学,这需要数字素养技能。研究目的是(a)评估在澳大利亚听力学诊所就诊的听力损失成人的数字素养,(b)建立数字素养与人口因素的关系。方法:对移动技术技能和信心的自我报告进行单中心横断面调查,采用两种测量方法(A)经过验证的移动设备熟练程度问卷-16项(MDPQ-16),以及(b)临床使用的简短的两项数字素养- 2q (DL-2Q),询问移动技能和移动信心。研究样本为以轻中度听力损失为主的成人(n = 110),年龄52-96岁(M = 73.9)。结果:年龄与MDPQ-16评分呈负相关,r(108) = -0.454, p < 0.001。然而,在65-85岁的中年人中,拥有良好移动能力的参与者(69.7%)是移动能力较差的参与者(30.3%)的两倍多。在DL-2Q测试中,92%的人认为自己胜任,58.3%的人认为自己自信,41.0%的人认为自己依赖于任务,他们的MDPQ-16得分都很好。然而,有25%的人对能力和自信的评价不匹配。没有其他人口统计学因素与数字素养显著相关。结论:尽管年龄总体上是影响数字素养的一个因素,但许多参加听力学预约的老年人,无论年龄大小,都被证明具有良好的数字素养。DL-2Q是评估听力学诊所数字素养的一种快速简便的方法。这有助于确保年龄不成为远程听力保健技术的障碍,所有受益的人都应该能够获得这些技术。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30853604。
{"title":"\"Don't Assume I'm Too Old!\": Assessment of Digital Literacy in a Clinical Sample of Adults With Hearing Loss.","authors":"Melanie Ferguson, Talveen Sahota, Cathy Sucher","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00160","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Digital and remote technologies are commonly used in audiology, which require digital literacy skills. The study objectives were to (a) assess digital literacy in adults with hearing loss attending an audiology clinic in Australia and (b) establish the relationship of digital literacy with demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-center, cross-sectional survey on self-report of skill and confidence with mobile technologies using two measures (a) the validated Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire-16 items (MDPQ-16), and (b) the short two-item Digital Literacy-2Q (DL-2Q) for clinical use asking about Mobile Skill and Mobile Confidence. The study sample was adults with primarily mild-moderate hearing loss (<i>n =</i> 110), aged 52-96 years (<i>M</i> = 73.9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age was negatively associated with MDPQ-16 scores, <i>r</i>(108) = -0.454, <i>p</i> < .001. However, in the mid-age range 65-85 years, more than twice as many participants (69.7%) had good mobile proficiency compared to those who had poorer mobile proficiency (30.3%). For the DL-2Q, the 92% who rated themselves as <i>competent</i>, and the 58.3% and 41.0% who rated themselves as <i>confident</i> or <i>depends on task</i>, respectively, had good MDPQ-16 scores. However, in 25% there was a mismatch between ratings of <i>competent</i> and <i>confident</i>. No other demographic factors were significantly associated with digital literacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although age overall was a factor in digital literacy, there were many older adults attending audiology appointments who were shown to have good digital literacy, irrespective of their age. The DL-2Q is a quick and easy measure to assess digital literacy in audiology clinics. This can help to ensure that age is not barrier to remote hearing health technologies, which should be accessible to all those who would benefit.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30853604.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A New Approach to Hearing Aid Directionality: Three-Microphone and Two-Microphone Hearing Aids for Speech Intelligibility. 助听器方向性的新途径:三麦克风和双麦克风助听器的语音清晰度。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00029
Mert Kılıç, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Ahsen Kartal Özcan, Sema Satıcı, Sare Çankaya, Zahra Polat

Purpose: Our study aimed to compare the new M&RIE (Microphone & Receiver-In-Ear) hearing aid directionality technology with the traditional omnidirectional mode in terms of speech intelligibility (SI) skills in noise.

Method: Twenty-four participants (12 women and 12 men) with bilateral symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss and no hearing aid experience, aged 28-65 years, were included in our study. Audiologic evaluations were performed, and eligible participants were fitted with hearing aids set to M&RIE and omnidirectional modes. Free-field hearing assessments and Turkish Matrix Tests under different signal/noise conditions were conducted.

Results: Significant differences were found between M&RIE and omnidirectional mode for both speech reception threshold and SI in noise when the signal was from the front and noise from the back (p < .01), as well as for SI when both signal and noise were presented from the front (p < .01).

Conclusions: In our study, M&RIE outperformed the omnidirectional mode in speech understanding tests under quiet and different noise conditions. Since placing the microphone in the ear canal is the most natural place for sound collection, M&RIE could potentially benefit any hearing aid user within the gain range of the device.

目的:本研究旨在比较新型M&RIE (Microphone & Receiver-In-Ear)助听器定向技术与传统全向模式在噪声环境下的语音清晰度(SI)技能。方法:选取24例无助听器使用经验的双侧对称感音神经性听力损失患者,男女各12例,年龄28 ~ 65岁。进行听力学评估,并为符合条件的参与者配备了设置为M&RIE和全向模式的助听器。在不同的信号/噪声条件下进行了自由场听力评估和土耳其矩阵测试。结果:M&RIE与全向模式的语音接收阈值和噪声信号在正面和背面呈现时的SI值均有显著性差异(p < 0.01),信号和噪声同时从正面呈现时的SI值也有显著性差异(p < 0.01)。结论:在我们的研究中,M&RIE在安静和不同噪声条件下的语音理解测试中表现优于全向模式。由于将麦克风放置在耳道中是最自然的声音收集位置,因此M&RIE可能会使设备增益范围内的任何助听器用户受益。
{"title":"A New Approach to Hearing Aid Directionality: Three-Microphone and Two-Microphone Hearing Aids for Speech Intelligibility.","authors":"Mert Kılıç, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Ahsen Kartal Özcan, Sema Satıcı, Sare Çankaya, Zahra Polat","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study aimed to compare the new M&RIE (Microphone & Receiver-In-Ear) hearing aid directionality technology with the traditional omnidirectional mode in terms of speech intelligibility (SI) skills in noise.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-four participants (12 women and 12 men) with bilateral symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss and no hearing aid experience, aged 28-65 years, were included in our study. Audiologic evaluations were performed, and eligible participants were fitted with hearing aids set to M&RIE and omnidirectional modes. Free-field hearing assessments and Turkish Matrix Tests under different signal/noise conditions were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were found between M&RIE and omnidirectional mode for both speech reception threshold and SI in noise when the signal was from the front and noise from the back (<i>p</i> < .01), as well as for SI when both signal and noise were presented from the front (<i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, M&RIE outperformed the omnidirectional mode in speech understanding tests under quiet and different noise conditions. Since placing the microphone in the ear canal is the most natural place for sound collection, M&RIE could potentially benefit any hearing aid user within the gain range of the device.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Age, Sex, and Hearing Thresholds on Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise. 年龄、性别和听力阈值对安静和噪音环境下语音识别的影响。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00124
Varsha M Athreya, Kristina M Ward, Matthew B Fitzgerald

Purpose: Audiologic assessment is crucial for managing hearing loss across the lifespan. Routine evaluations typically include pure-tone audiometry and word recognition in quiet (WRQ), the clinical standard for over 60 years. More recently, speech-in-noise tests such as the Quick Speech-in-Noise Test (QuickSIN) have been adopted. This study investigated the effects of age, sex, and hearing sensitivity on WRQ and QuickSIN performance in a large clinical cohort.

Method: Data from 9,042 patients (17,414 ears; aged 18-90 years) who underwent audiometric assessment at the Stanford Ear Institute were analyzed. All completed pure-tone audiometry, WRQ, and monaural QuickSIN. Analyses focused on individuals with hearing loss (9,373 ears) and those with normal hearing (4,277 ears), using stepwise linear regression. In a subset of normal-hearing individuals (1,095 ears), perceived auditory disability was also assessed using the 12-item Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12).

Results: In the hearing-loss cohort, high-frequency pure-tone average (HFPTA) predicted both WRQ and QuickSIN performance. Sex also contributed, with females performing better on QuickSIN but worse on WRQ. After adjusting for HFPTA and sex, age affected QuickSIN but not WRQ. In the normal-hearing group, hearing sensitivity had no effect on WRQ, but thresholds at 2000 and 4000 Hz influenced QuickSIN. Sex predicted QuickSIN performance, with males performing better. After accounting for thresholds, age was associated with both WRQ and QuickSIN. QuickSIN, but not WRQ, predicted perceived auditory disability on the SSQ12.

Conclusions: After accounting for hearing sensitivity, age showed minimal effects on speech performance in normal-hearing and hearing-loss groups, explaining less than 1% of WRQ variance and < 0.5 dB on QuickSIN. These findings suggest age has limited impact on speech recognition once hearing thresholds are considered. Small but consistent sex effects aligned with prior work. For WRQ, ceiling effects may mask age-related changes, while for QuickSIN, the small effect may be driven by additional peripheral or central auditory factors.

目的:听力学评估对于管理终生听力损失至关重要。常规评估通常包括纯音听力测定和安静中的单词识别(WRQ),这是60多年来的临床标准。最近,语音噪声测试,如快速语音噪声测试(QuickSIN)已被采用。本研究在一个大型临床队列中调查了年龄、性别和听力敏感性对WRQ和QuickSIN表现的影响。方法:分析9042例患者(17414耳,年龄18-90岁)在斯坦福耳研究所接受听力学评估的数据。所有完成纯音测听,WRQ和单音QuickSIN。分析集中在听力损失个体(9373耳)和听力正常个体(4277耳),使用逐步线性回归。在正常听力个体的一个子集(1095只耳朵)中,还使用12项言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ12)评估了听觉障碍。结果:在听力损失队列中,高频纯音平均(HFPTA)可以预测WRQ和QuickSIN的表现。性别也有影响,女性在QuickSIN上表现更好,但在WRQ上表现更差。在调整HFPTA和性别后,年龄对QuickSIN有影响,但对WRQ没有影响。在听力正常组中,听力敏感性对WRQ没有影响,但2000和4000 Hz的阈值影响QuickSIN。性别预示着QuickSIN的表现,男性表现更好。在考虑阈值之后,年龄与WRQ和QuickSIN都相关。QuickSIN能预测SSQ12的听觉障碍,而WRQ不能。结论:在考虑了听力敏感性后,年龄对正常听力组和听力损失组的语言表现的影响最小,解释了不到1%的WRQ方差和< 0.5 dB的QuickSIN。这些发现表明,一旦考虑到听力阈值,年龄对语音识别的影响有限。小而一致的性别效应与之前的研究结果一致。对于WRQ,天花板效应可能掩盖了与年龄相关的变化,而对于QuickSIN,小的影响可能是由额外的外周或中枢听觉因素驱动的。
{"title":"The Impact of Age, Sex, and Hearing Thresholds on Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise.","authors":"Varsha M Athreya, Kristina M Ward, Matthew B Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Audiologic assessment is crucial for managing hearing loss across the lifespan. Routine evaluations typically include pure-tone audiometry and word recognition in quiet (WRQ), the clinical standard for over 60 years. More recently, speech-in-noise tests such as the Quick Speech-in-Noise Test (QuickSIN) have been adopted. This study investigated the effects of age, sex, and hearing sensitivity on WRQ and QuickSIN performance in a large clinical cohort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from 9,042 patients (17,414 ears; aged 18-90 years) who underwent audiometric assessment at the Stanford Ear Institute were analyzed. All completed pure-tone audiometry, WRQ, and monaural QuickSIN. Analyses focused on individuals with hearing loss (9,373 ears) and those with normal hearing (4,277 ears), using stepwise linear regression. In a subset of normal-hearing individuals (1,095 ears), perceived auditory disability was also assessed using the 12-item Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the hearing-loss cohort, high-frequency pure-tone average (HFPTA) predicted both WRQ and QuickSIN performance. Sex also contributed, with females performing better on QuickSIN but worse on WRQ. After adjusting for HFPTA and sex, age affected QuickSIN but not WRQ. In the normal-hearing group, hearing sensitivity had no effect on WRQ, but thresholds at 2000 and 4000 Hz influenced QuickSIN. Sex predicted QuickSIN performance, with males performing better. After accounting for thresholds, age was associated with both WRQ and QuickSIN. QuickSIN, but not WRQ, predicted perceived auditory disability on the SSQ12.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After accounting for hearing sensitivity, age showed minimal effects on speech performance in normal-hearing and hearing-loss groups, explaining less than 1% of WRQ variance and < 0.5 dB on QuickSIN. These findings suggest age has limited impact on speech recognition once hearing thresholds are considered. Small but consistent sex effects aligned with prior work. For WRQ, ceiling effects may mask age-related changes, while for QuickSIN, the small effect may be driven by additional peripheral or central auditory factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
School-Based Hearing Conservation Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review. 以学校为基础的儿童和青少年听力保护计划:范围审查。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00173
Min Kyung Han, Ireland Watterson

Purpose: The aim of this scoping review was to examine key elements of school-based hearing conservation programs (HCPs) for children and adolescents, with a focus on intervention program components, delivery strategies, outcome measures, and reported results. This review serves as a preliminary step in developing an HCP for children and adolescents.

Method: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, four bibliographic databases were searched to identify relevant articles. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts against the eligibility criteria, seven studies were included in the review.

Results: The included studies addressed a range of themes, several of which were informed by health behavior theories. Most interventions were conducted in classroom settings by members of the research team. These interventions typically comprised one or two sessions of less than 60 min, using various delivery methods. Outcomes were assessed primarily through questionnaires, with study designs commonly following a pretest-intervention-posttest format; some studies also incorporated short-term follow-up assessments. Findings revealed that older students showed more resistance to behavior change.

Conclusions: Program effectiveness was strongly associated with multiple, repeated intervention sessions; various delivery modalities; and long-term follow-up. Moreover, early intervention is particularly important, as younger children demonstrate better long-term retention than adolescents.

目的:本范围综述的目的是研究以学校为基础的儿童和青少年听力保护计划(HCPs)的关键要素,重点是干预计划的组成部分、实施策略、结果测量和报告结果。本综述可作为制定儿童和青少年HCP的初步步骤。方法:根据系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展指南,检索四个书目数据库以确定相关文章。根据入选标准筛选标题、摘要和全文后,纳入了7项研究。结果:纳入的研究涉及一系列主题,其中一些是由健康行为理论通知。大多数干预是由研究小组成员在教室环境中进行的。这些干预措施通常包括一到两次少于60分钟的会议,使用各种交付方法。结果主要通过问卷进行评估,研究设计通常采用前测试-干预-后测试的形式;一些研究还纳入了短期随访评估。研究结果显示,年龄较大的学生对行为改变表现出更大的抵制。结论:项目的有效性与多次、重复的干预课程密切相关;多种交付方式;以及长期随访。此外,早期干预尤其重要,因为年幼的儿童比青少年表现出更好的长期记忆力。
{"title":"School-Based Hearing Conservation Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Min Kyung Han, Ireland Watterson","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this scoping review was to examine key elements of school-based hearing conservation programs (HCPs) for children and adolescents, with a focus on intervention program components, delivery strategies, outcome measures, and reported results. This review serves as a preliminary step in developing an HCP for children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, four bibliographic databases were searched to identify relevant articles. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts against the eligibility criteria, seven studies were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included studies addressed a range of themes, several of which were informed by health behavior theories. Most interventions were conducted in classroom settings by members of the research team. These interventions typically comprised one or two sessions of less than 60 min, using various delivery methods. Outcomes were assessed primarily through questionnaires, with study designs commonly following a pretest-intervention-posttest format; some studies also incorporated short-term follow-up assessments. Findings revealed that older students showed more resistance to behavior change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Program effectiveness was strongly associated with multiple, repeated intervention sessions; various delivery modalities; and long-term follow-up. Moreover, early intervention is particularly important, as younger children demonstrate better long-term retention than adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Audiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1