Impact of Regulatory Risk Communication on Thrombosis With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome for COVID-19 Adenovirus Vector Vaccines on European Healthcare Professionals.
Ella van Vliet, Nanča Čebron Lipovec, Marloes van der Goot, Shahab Abtahi, Inês Ribeiro-Vaz, Elita Poplavska, Foteini Dermiki-Gkana, Chara Oikonomou, Elena Deligianni, Christos Kontogiorgis, Ana Marta Silva, Paula Barão Sousa Ferreira, Mitja Kos, Anna Birna Almarsdóttir, Ramune Jacobsen, Caroline Buhl, Adrie de Bruijn, Ingrid Hegger, Teresa Leonardo Alves
{"title":"Impact of Regulatory Risk Communication on Thrombosis With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome for COVID-19 Adenovirus Vector Vaccines on European Healthcare Professionals.","authors":"Ella van Vliet, Nanča Čebron Lipovec, Marloes van der Goot, Shahab Abtahi, Inês Ribeiro-Vaz, Elita Poplavska, Foteini Dermiki-Gkana, Chara Oikonomou, Elena Deligianni, Christos Kontogiorgis, Ana Marta Silva, Paula Barão Sousa Ferreira, Mitja Kos, Anna Birna Almarsdóttir, Ramune Jacobsen, Caroline Buhl, Adrie de Bruijn, Ingrid Hegger, Teresa Leonardo Alves","doi":"10.1002/pds.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued regulatory actions and communications in 2021 on thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) associated with adenovirus vector vaccines Vaxzevria or Jcovden. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of these actions on awareness, knowledge and implementation in practises of healthcare professionals (HCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Web-based cross-sectional surveys were conducted on HCPs engaged in the vaccination, monitoring or counselling about the vaccines. We measured awareness and knowledge of the risk of TTS and their implementation of recommendations in practise. Descriptive and qualitative analyses were conducted. This study took place in Greece, Latvia, Netherlands, Portugal and Slovenia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We surveyed 1659 HCPs. From these, 914 were included in the analysis. Most were aware about the reports of TTS associated with COVID-19 adenovirus vector vaccines, with countries reporting percentages between 85% and 97%. Mainstream media, health authorities and peers were the main sources of TTS risk information. Most HCPs were able to identify key symptoms from TTS but were less familiar with minor symptoms. Guidelines from health authorities on COVID-19 vaccination impacted on professional practise of 55%-77% of HCPs. The reported use of product information across countries was moderate, with some variations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Awareness about and knowledge of TTS risk from COVID-19 adenoviral vector vaccines were high among HCPs. HCPs reported a clear preference for national guidelines as source of risk information and the implementation of product information remained moderate across countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"33 12","pages":"e70057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued regulatory actions and communications in 2021 on thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) associated with adenovirus vector vaccines Vaxzevria or Jcovden. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of these actions on awareness, knowledge and implementation in practises of healthcare professionals (HCP).
Methods: Web-based cross-sectional surveys were conducted on HCPs engaged in the vaccination, monitoring or counselling about the vaccines. We measured awareness and knowledge of the risk of TTS and their implementation of recommendations in practise. Descriptive and qualitative analyses were conducted. This study took place in Greece, Latvia, Netherlands, Portugal and Slovenia.
Results: We surveyed 1659 HCPs. From these, 914 were included in the analysis. Most were aware about the reports of TTS associated with COVID-19 adenovirus vector vaccines, with countries reporting percentages between 85% and 97%. Mainstream media, health authorities and peers were the main sources of TTS risk information. Most HCPs were able to identify key symptoms from TTS but were less familiar with minor symptoms. Guidelines from health authorities on COVID-19 vaccination impacted on professional practise of 55%-77% of HCPs. The reported use of product information across countries was moderate, with some variations.
Conclusions: Awareness about and knowledge of TTS risk from COVID-19 adenoviral vector vaccines were high among HCPs. HCPs reported a clear preference for national guidelines as source of risk information and the implementation of product information remained moderate across countries.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.