A Network Analysis of Depression and Cognitive Impairments in Fibromyalgia: A Secondary Analysis Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatric Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1007/s11126-024-10106-6
Dariush Tahmasebi Aghbelaghi, Mahbobeh Jalali, Natalie Tayim, Roghayeh Kiyani
{"title":"A Network Analysis of Depression and Cognitive Impairments in Fibromyalgia: A Secondary Analysis Study.","authors":"Dariush Tahmasebi Aghbelaghi, Mahbobeh Jalali, Natalie Tayim, Roghayeh Kiyani","doi":"10.1007/s11126-024-10106-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition often accompanied by cognitive impairments, such as difficulties with sustained attention, and emotional disturbances, particularly depression and anxiety. Understanding how these emotional and cognitive factors interact is crucial to improving treatment for fibromyalgia patients. This study aimed to investigate the network structure of these interactions, focusing on the relationship between depression, anxiety, and cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of one hundred ten participants diagnosed with fibromyalgia completed self-reported assessments of depression and anxiety, alongside cognitive performance tests. Key measures included Continuous Performance Tasks (CPT) for impulsivity and sustained attention, the Stroop Interference Index (StI), Stroop Color Naming (StC), and Stroop Word Reading (StW). Network analysis was conducted to estimate the relationships between emotional and cognitive variables and assess their centrality within the network.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Errors in CPT emerged as the most significant indicators of the relationship between depression and cognitive performance, with high centrality values observed for the Stroop tasks (StI, StC, and StW). Additionally, Trait Anxiety (A_T) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) measures showed high centrality, underscoring the critical role of emotional states in the network of cognitive and emotional variables. The centrality values for cognitive flexibility, processing speed, and inhibitory control were found to be 0.85, 0.78, and 0.72, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the strong association between depression symptoms and deficits in cognitive domains, emphasizing the need for integrated care approaches that address both cognitive and emotional health. Multidisciplinary treatment programs, including cognitive rehabilitation and psychological support, could improve patient outcomes by targeting the most influential variables in the cognitive-emotional network.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-024-10106-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition often accompanied by cognitive impairments, such as difficulties with sustained attention, and emotional disturbances, particularly depression and anxiety. Understanding how these emotional and cognitive factors interact is crucial to improving treatment for fibromyalgia patients. This study aimed to investigate the network structure of these interactions, focusing on the relationship between depression, anxiety, and cognitive performance.

Method: A total of one hundred ten participants diagnosed with fibromyalgia completed self-reported assessments of depression and anxiety, alongside cognitive performance tests. Key measures included Continuous Performance Tasks (CPT) for impulsivity and sustained attention, the Stroop Interference Index (StI), Stroop Color Naming (StC), and Stroop Word Reading (StW). Network analysis was conducted to estimate the relationships between emotional and cognitive variables and assess their centrality within the network.

Results: Errors in CPT emerged as the most significant indicators of the relationship between depression and cognitive performance, with high centrality values observed for the Stroop tasks (StI, StC, and StW). Additionally, Trait Anxiety (A_T) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) measures showed high centrality, underscoring the critical role of emotional states in the network of cognitive and emotional variables. The centrality values for cognitive flexibility, processing speed, and inhibitory control were found to be 0.85, 0.78, and 0.72, respectively.

Conclusion: This study highlights the strong association between depression symptoms and deficits in cognitive domains, emphasizing the need for integrated care approaches that address both cognitive and emotional health. Multidisciplinary treatment programs, including cognitive rehabilitation and psychological support, could improve patient outcomes by targeting the most influential variables in the cognitive-emotional network.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维肌痛中抑郁和认知障碍的网络分析:二次分析研究
引言纤维肌痛是一种慢性疾病,通常伴有认知障碍(如持续注意力困难)和情感障碍(尤其是抑郁和焦虑)。了解这些情绪和认知因素如何相互作用,对于改善纤维肌痛患者的治疗至关重要。本研究旨在调查这些相互作用的网络结构,重点研究抑郁、焦虑和认知表现之间的关系:共有 110 名被诊断为纤维肌痛的参与者完成了自我报告的抑郁和焦虑评估以及认知能力测试。主要测试包括冲动性和持续注意力的连续表现任务(CPT)、斯特罗普干扰指数(StI)、斯特罗普颜色命名(StC)和斯特罗普词语阅读(StW)。研究人员进行了网络分析,以估计情绪变量和认知变量之间的关系,并评估它们在网络中的中心地位:CPT中的错误是抑郁与认知表现之间关系最显著的指标,Stroop任务(StI、StC和StW)的中心性值较高。此外,特质焦虑(A_T)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)也显示出较高的中心性,突出了情绪状态在认知和情绪变量网络中的关键作用。认知灵活性、处理速度和抑制控制的中心性值分别为 0.85、0.78 和 0.72:本研究强调了抑郁症状与认知领域缺陷之间的密切联系,强调了采取综合护理方法同时解决认知和情绪健康问题的必要性。包括认知康复和心理支持在内的多学科治疗方案可以通过针对认知-情感网络中最具影响力的变量来改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
期刊最新文献
The Mediating Role of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation and Earthquake Stress Coping in the Relationship Between Posttraumatic Cognitive Attribution and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Türkiye 2023 Earthquake Survivors. Network Analysis of Psychological Empowerment, Need for Cognition, and Academic Self-Efficacy among Graduate Students. Pathway from Earthquake Fear to Post-Traumatic Growth: The Roles of Resilience, Self-Efficacy, and Positive Childhood Memories Among Survivors of the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes. Psychometric Properties and Network Analysis of the Arabic Version of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Scale-Short Version in Patients with Anxiety Disorders. An Exploratory Study about Factors and Outcomes Associated with the Experience of Coercive Measures in Mental Health Settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1