Feminist approaches to promoting researcher well-being through collective and organizational care.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1322903
Catherine Carlson, Sylvia Namakula, Agnes Grace Nabachwa, Anik Gevers, Kelsey Morgan-Babikov, Luciana Giorgio Cosenzo, Melissa Ticozzi, Sophie Namy
{"title":"Feminist approaches to promoting researcher well-being through collective and organizational care.","authors":"Catherine Carlson, Sylvia Namakula, Agnes Grace Nabachwa, Anik Gevers, Kelsey Morgan-Babikov, Luciana Giorgio Cosenzo, Melissa Ticozzi, Sophie Namy","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1322903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers working in the field of violence against women and children are often tasked with listening to highly distressing personal accounts of violence and subsequent trauma. Without proper attention and mitigation strategies, this exposure can lead to vicarious trauma and related symptoms with significant impact on researchers' well-being. As women are often leading and carrying out violence research, they also experience a disproportionate burden of risk of vicarious trauma symptoms. This case study highlights seven collective care strategies for research implemented by Healing and Resilience after Trauma (HaRT), a feminist organization dedicated to holistic healing among survivors of human trafficking and gender-based violence, whose team is entirely composed of women. Further, it explores how creating and integrating collective care into research protocols can help prevent vicarious trauma and enhance researchers' emotional well-being as well as positively influence research quality. Qualitative data from researchers involved in the study on these strategies and how they affected their well-being are included. The piece concludes by discussing potential recommendations for other research teams and organizations seeking to mitigate the risk of vicarious trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1322903"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1322903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers working in the field of violence against women and children are often tasked with listening to highly distressing personal accounts of violence and subsequent trauma. Without proper attention and mitigation strategies, this exposure can lead to vicarious trauma and related symptoms with significant impact on researchers' well-being. As women are often leading and carrying out violence research, they also experience a disproportionate burden of risk of vicarious trauma symptoms. This case study highlights seven collective care strategies for research implemented by Healing and Resilience after Trauma (HaRT), a feminist organization dedicated to holistic healing among survivors of human trafficking and gender-based violence, whose team is entirely composed of women. Further, it explores how creating and integrating collective care into research protocols can help prevent vicarious trauma and enhance researchers' emotional well-being as well as positively influence research quality. Qualitative data from researchers involved in the study on these strategies and how they affected their well-being are included. The piece concludes by discussing potential recommendations for other research teams and organizations seeking to mitigate the risk of vicarious trauma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过集体和组织关怀促进研究人员福祉的女性主义方法。
在暴力侵害妇女和儿童领域工作的研究人员经常需要倾听极度痛苦的关于暴力和随之而来的创伤的个人陈述。如果没有适当的关注和缓解策略,这种接触可能会导致替代性创伤和相关症状,对研究人员的福祉产生重大影响。由于妇女通常领导和开展暴力研究,她们也承受着不成比例的替代性创伤症状的风险负担。本案例研究重点介绍了 "创伤后愈合与复原"(Healing and Resilience after Trauma,HaRT)组织实施的七项集体关怀研究策略。该组织是一个女权主义组织,致力于人口贩运和性别暴力幸存者的整体康复,其团队全部由女性组成。此外,本报告还探讨了创建集体关怀并将其纳入研究方案如何有助于防止替代性创伤、提高研究人员的情绪健康并对研究质量产生积极影响。文章还收录了参与研究的研究人员提供的有关这些策略的定性数据,以及这些策略如何影响他们的幸福感。文章最后讨论了为其他研究团队和组织寻求减轻替代性创伤风险的潜在建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Dismantling racial inequalities in higher education. Exploring perceived barriers to palliative and end of life care provision in South-West England: bringing together the perspectives of professionals, patients, and families. Unveiling inequality: the sociological dynamics of road infrastructure development and social justice in rural Eastern Cape, South Africa. Using the knife to build the trust? The role of trust in the decision-making process of aesthetic surgeons and women patients/clients. A family caregiver perspective: rethinking recovery with phenomenology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1