Catherine Carlson, Sylvia Namakula, Agnes Grace Nabachwa, Anik Gevers, Kelsey Morgan-Babikov, Luciana Giorgio Cosenzo, Melissa Ticozzi, Sophie Namy
{"title":"Feminist approaches to promoting researcher well-being through collective and organizational care.","authors":"Catherine Carlson, Sylvia Namakula, Agnes Grace Nabachwa, Anik Gevers, Kelsey Morgan-Babikov, Luciana Giorgio Cosenzo, Melissa Ticozzi, Sophie Namy","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1322903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers working in the field of violence against women and children are often tasked with listening to highly distressing personal accounts of violence and subsequent trauma. Without proper attention and mitigation strategies, this exposure can lead to vicarious trauma and related symptoms with significant impact on researchers' well-being. As women are often leading and carrying out violence research, they also experience a disproportionate burden of risk of vicarious trauma symptoms. This case study highlights seven collective care strategies for research implemented by Healing and Resilience after Trauma (HaRT), a feminist organization dedicated to holistic healing among survivors of human trafficking and gender-based violence, whose team is entirely composed of women. Further, it explores how creating and integrating collective care into research protocols can help prevent vicarious trauma and enhance researchers' emotional well-being as well as positively influence research quality. Qualitative data from researchers involved in the study on these strategies and how they affected their well-being are included. The piece concludes by discussing potential recommendations for other research teams and organizations seeking to mitigate the risk of vicarious trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1322903"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1322903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Researchers working in the field of violence against women and children are often tasked with listening to highly distressing personal accounts of violence and subsequent trauma. Without proper attention and mitigation strategies, this exposure can lead to vicarious trauma and related symptoms with significant impact on researchers' well-being. As women are often leading and carrying out violence research, they also experience a disproportionate burden of risk of vicarious trauma symptoms. This case study highlights seven collective care strategies for research implemented by Healing and Resilience after Trauma (HaRT), a feminist organization dedicated to holistic healing among survivors of human trafficking and gender-based violence, whose team is entirely composed of women. Further, it explores how creating and integrating collective care into research protocols can help prevent vicarious trauma and enhance researchers' emotional well-being as well as positively influence research quality. Qualitative data from researchers involved in the study on these strategies and how they affected their well-being are included. The piece concludes by discussing potential recommendations for other research teams and organizations seeking to mitigate the risk of vicarious trauma.
在暴力侵害妇女和儿童领域工作的研究人员经常需要倾听极度痛苦的关于暴力和随之而来的创伤的个人陈述。如果没有适当的关注和缓解策略,这种接触可能会导致替代性创伤和相关症状,对研究人员的福祉产生重大影响。由于妇女通常领导和开展暴力研究,她们也承受着不成比例的替代性创伤症状的风险负担。本案例研究重点介绍了 "创伤后愈合与复原"(Healing and Resilience after Trauma,HaRT)组织实施的七项集体关怀研究策略。该组织是一个女权主义组织,致力于人口贩运和性别暴力幸存者的整体康复,其团队全部由女性组成。此外,本报告还探讨了创建集体关怀并将其纳入研究方案如何有助于防止替代性创伤、提高研究人员的情绪健康并对研究质量产生积极影响。文章还收录了参与研究的研究人员提供的有关这些策略的定性数据,以及这些策略如何影响他们的幸福感。文章最后讨论了为其他研究团队和组织寻求减轻替代性创伤风险的潜在建议。