Application of Machine Learning Techniques to the Prediction of Onset and Persistence of Binge Eating: A Prospective Study.

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY European Eating Disorders Review Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1002/erv.3154
Zoe McClure, Christopher J Greenwood, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Mariel Messer, Jake Linardon
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning Techniques to the Prediction of Onset and Persistence of Binge Eating: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Zoe McClure, Christopher J Greenwood, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Mariel Messer, Jake Linardon","doi":"10.1002/erv.3154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise for enhancing prediction of clinical outcomes; however, its application to predicting binge eating has been scarcely explored. We applied ML techniques to predict binge eating onset (vs. continued absence) and persistence (vs. remission) over time.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were used from a larger prospective study of 1106 participants who were assessed on a range of putative risk, maintaining, and protective factors at baseline and 8 months follow-up. Nine ML models for classification were developed and compared against a generalised linear model (GLM) for predicting onset (n = 334) and persistence (n = 623) outcomes using 39 self-reported baseline variables as predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models performed poorly at predicting onset (AUC = 0.49-0.61) and persistence (AUC = 0.50-0.59) outcomes, with ML models demonstrating comparable performance to the GLM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We suspect that poor ML performance may have been a result of the limited set of self-reported baseline predictors used to generate prediction models. Improved predictive accuracy and optimisation of ML models in future research may require consideration of a larger, more disparate set of predictors that also incorporate various data types, such as neuroimaging, physiological, or smartphone sensor data.</p>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise for enhancing prediction of clinical outcomes; however, its application to predicting binge eating has been scarcely explored. We applied ML techniques to predict binge eating onset (vs. continued absence) and persistence (vs. remission) over time.

Method: Data were used from a larger prospective study of 1106 participants who were assessed on a range of putative risk, maintaining, and protective factors at baseline and 8 months follow-up. Nine ML models for classification were developed and compared against a generalised linear model (GLM) for predicting onset (n = 334) and persistence (n = 623) outcomes using 39 self-reported baseline variables as predictors.

Results: All models performed poorly at predicting onset (AUC = 0.49-0.61) and persistence (AUC = 0.50-0.59) outcomes, with ML models demonstrating comparable performance to the GLM.

Conclusion: We suspect that poor ML performance may have been a result of the limited set of self-reported baseline predictors used to generate prediction models. Improved predictive accuracy and optimisation of ML models in future research may require consideration of a larger, more disparate set of predictors that also incorporate various data types, such as neuroimaging, physiological, or smartphone sensor data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用机器学习技术预测暴食的发生和持续时间:一项前瞻性研究
目的:机器学习(ML)技术有望提高临床结果的预测能力,但其在暴食预测中的应用却鲜有探索。我们应用 ML 技术来预测暴食的开始(与持续缺失)和随着时间推移的持续(与缓解):方法:我们使用了一项大型前瞻性研究中的数据,该研究涉及 1106 名参与者,他们在基线和 8 个月的随访中接受了一系列假定风险、维持和保护因素的评估。使用 39 个自我报告的基线变量作为预测因子,建立了九个 ML 分类模型,并与广义线性模型(GLM)进行比较,以预测发病(334 人)和持续发病(623 人)的结果:所有模型在预测发病(AUC = 0.49-0.61)和持续(AUC = 0.50-0.59)结果方面的表现都很差,ML 模型的表现与 GLM 相当:我们认为,ML 性能不佳的原因可能是用于生成预测模型的自我报告基线预测因子有限。在未来的研究中,要提高预测准确性并优化 ML 模型,可能需要考虑更大、更不同的预测因子集,并结合各种数据类型,如神经影像、生理或智能手机传感器数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
User Experience and Therapeutic Alliance of Treatment Completers of Clinician-Supported Versus Self-Help Online Intervention for Eating Disorders: A Mixed Methods Approach. Considering a Functional Conceptualisation of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): A Systematic Scoping Review of Emerging Evidence on ARFID. Issue Information A Meaning-Centered Intervention for Undergraduate Women With High Weight and Shape Concerns-Replication of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Oxytocin Amplifies Negative Response to Ambiguity in Adolescent Females With and Without Eating Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1