Proximal Muscle Resistance Training to Improve Walking in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000504
Mark M Mañago, Jeri E Forster, Eliza Biondi, Margaret Schenkman, Michelle H Cameron, Cory L Christiansen
{"title":"Proximal Muscle Resistance Training to Improve Walking in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Mark M Mañago, Jeri E Forster, Eliza Biondi, Margaret Schenkman, Michelle H Cameron, Cory L Christiansen","doi":"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>This pilot study examined the feasibility of a proximal muscle resistance training program to improve walking in people with multiple sclerosis using a combination of in-person, virtual, and independent exercise sessions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale Score is <6.0) were recruited to a study of resistance training exercises targeting hip abduction and trunk muscles for 10 weeks. Feasibility criteria were: enrolling 40 participants, retaining ≥80%, ≥80% visit adherence, no serious intervention-related adverse events, and ≥80% satisfaction. The 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, muscle performance (hip abduction and lateral trunk flexion strength, and trunk flexion endurance), patient-reported outcomes, daily step count, and pelvis and trunk kinematics were measured before and after intervention. Patient-reported outcomes and step count were measured again 12 weeks after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight people (median Expanded Disability Status Scale is 3.5) enrolled and 92.8% were retained. Visit adherence was 86.5% (96% for virtual visits, 74% for in-person visits), and 48% of participants preferred virtual visits, while 20% preferred in-person visits. There were no serious intervention-related adverse events, and there was 100% satisfaction. Following intervention, 6-Minute Walk Test distance increased 29.6 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2-47.0), Timed 25-Foot Walk Test decreased by 0.57 seconds (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.29), and all muscle performance outcomes improved. Patient-reported outcomes also improved immediately following intervention. There were no changes in average daily step count or trunk and pelvis kinematics.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>This proximal muscle resistance training program was feasible, with benefits in walking and muscle strength, warranting a future efficacy study.</p><p><p>Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A499).</p>","PeriodicalId":49030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: This pilot study examined the feasibility of a proximal muscle resistance training program to improve walking in people with multiple sclerosis using a combination of in-person, virtual, and independent exercise sessions.

Methods: People with multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale Score is <6.0) were recruited to a study of resistance training exercises targeting hip abduction and trunk muscles for 10 weeks. Feasibility criteria were: enrolling 40 participants, retaining ≥80%, ≥80% visit adherence, no serious intervention-related adverse events, and ≥80% satisfaction. The 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, muscle performance (hip abduction and lateral trunk flexion strength, and trunk flexion endurance), patient-reported outcomes, daily step count, and pelvis and trunk kinematics were measured before and after intervention. Patient-reported outcomes and step count were measured again 12 weeks after intervention.

Results: Twenty-eight people (median Expanded Disability Status Scale is 3.5) enrolled and 92.8% were retained. Visit adherence was 86.5% (96% for virtual visits, 74% for in-person visits), and 48% of participants preferred virtual visits, while 20% preferred in-person visits. There were no serious intervention-related adverse events, and there was 100% satisfaction. Following intervention, 6-Minute Walk Test distance increased 29.6 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2-47.0), Timed 25-Foot Walk Test decreased by 0.57 seconds (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.29), and all muscle performance outcomes improved. Patient-reported outcomes also improved immediately following intervention. There were no changes in average daily step count or trunk and pelvis kinematics.

Discussion and conclusions: This proximal muscle resistance training program was feasible, with benefits in walking and muscle strength, warranting a future efficacy study.

Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A499).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近端肌肉阻力训练改善多发性硬化症患者的行走能力:一项试点研究
背景和目的:这项试验性研究考察了近端肌肉阻力训练计划的可行性,该计划采用面对面、虚拟和独立锻炼相结合的方式改善多发性硬化症患者的行走状况:方法:多发性硬化症患者(扩展残疾状况量表评分为 结果:28 人(中位数为扩展残疾状况量表评分)接受了近端肌肉阻力训练:28 人(扩展残疾状况量表中位数为 3.5)参加了训练,92.8% 的人坚持了训练。就诊依从性为 86.5%(虚拟就诊依从性为 96%,现场就诊依从性为 74%),48% 的参与者偏好虚拟就诊,20% 的参与者偏好现场就诊。没有发生与干预相关的严重不良事件,满意度达到 100%。干预后,6 分钟步行测试距离增加了 29.6 米(95% 置信区间 [CI],12.2-47.0),25 英尺定时步行测试时间缩短了 0.57 秒(95% 置信区间,-0.85 到 -0.29),所有肌肉表现结果均有所改善。患者报告的结果也在干预后立即得到改善。每日平均步数、躯干和骨盆运动学没有变化:这个近端肌肉阻力训练计划是可行的,对步行和肌肉力量有好处,值得在未来进行疗效研究。视频摘要可获得作者的更多见解(请参阅视频,补充数字内容1,网址:http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A499)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy (JNPT) is an indexed resource for dissemination of research-based evidence related to neurologic physical therapy intervention. High standards of quality are maintained through a rigorous, double-blinded, peer-review process and adherence to standards recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. With an international editorial board made up of preeminent researchers and clinicians, JNPT publishes articles of global relevance for examination, evaluation, prognosis, intervention, and outcomes for individuals with movement deficits due to neurologic conditions. Through systematic reviews, research articles, case studies, and clinical perspectives, JNPT promotes the integration of evidence into theory, education, research, and practice of neurologic physical therapy, spanning the continuum from pathophysiology to societal participation.
期刊最新文献
Measuring Exercise Self-Efficacy After Stroke: Validity and Reliability of Current Measures. Reflections and Aspirations: Shaping the Future of Neurologic Physical Therapy. Atypical PC-BPPV - Cupulolithiasis and Short-Arm Canalithiasis: A Retrospective Observational Study. Do People With Stroke Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Activity Guidelines? Data From the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Effects of Diabetes and Attentional Focus on Learning of a Novel Balance Task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1