Socioeconomic-related inequities in child immunization: horizontal and vertical dimensions for policy insights.

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Health Economics Review Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s13561-024-00566-8
M D Azharuddin Akhtar, Indrani Roy Chowdhury, Pallabi Gogoi, M SriPriya Reddy
{"title":"Socioeconomic-related inequities in child immunization: horizontal and vertical dimensions for policy insights.","authors":"M D Azharuddin Akhtar, Indrani Roy Chowdhury, Pallabi Gogoi, M SriPriya Reddy","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00566-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incomplete immunization has potentially exposed vulnerable children, especially from the socioeconomically disadvantage group, to vaccine preventable diseases. The schemes would maximize social benefit only when the immunization is effectively distributed on an equitable principle.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The empirical study is based on unit level data from India's National Sample Survey: \"Social Consumption: Health Survey- NSS 75th Round (2017-18) database. The nationwide survey is designed on the stratified multi-stage sampling method with an objective to make the sample representative. The egalitarian equity principle requires that distribution of vaccine should be based on health needs of children, irrespective of their socioeconomic and regional factors and the principle is broadly based on two aspects - horizontal and vertical equity. The horizontal inequity (HI) is a direct form of injustice, when children with equal needs of routine immunisation are treated differentially due to their socioeconomic status, while vertical inequity (VI) is indirect form of injustice when children with differential health needs and risks exposure do not receive appropriately unequal but equitable immunisation. Using Indirect Standardisation Method and Erreygers' Corrected Concentration Index, we measure the degree of horizontal and vertical inequities, and then linearly decompose them to identify the major factors contributing towards the respective indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show that incomplete immunization is significantly concentrated among children belonging to poorer households. After controlling for the confounding effects of need factors, the inequity is still significantly pro-poor (i.e., horizontal inequity). The decomposition reveals that lower education, lower consumption and rural habitation are the major factors driving the corresponding inequity. Further, the differential effect of the needs between all and the target groups (at least based on education), is observed, however, is not statistically significant enough to realize inequity (i.e., no vertical inequity). Overall, the inequity is being induced via non-need factors. We further find that community health services (like anganwadi) have contributed towards reducing the inequity in child immunization significantly. The paper highlights the policy recommendation that the child immunisation program should target factors driving HI and need to align their distribution in terms of risks exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-024-00566-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incomplete immunization has potentially exposed vulnerable children, especially from the socioeconomically disadvantage group, to vaccine preventable diseases. The schemes would maximize social benefit only when the immunization is effectively distributed on an equitable principle.

Method: The empirical study is based on unit level data from India's National Sample Survey: "Social Consumption: Health Survey- NSS 75th Round (2017-18) database. The nationwide survey is designed on the stratified multi-stage sampling method with an objective to make the sample representative. The egalitarian equity principle requires that distribution of vaccine should be based on health needs of children, irrespective of their socioeconomic and regional factors and the principle is broadly based on two aspects - horizontal and vertical equity. The horizontal inequity (HI) is a direct form of injustice, when children with equal needs of routine immunisation are treated differentially due to their socioeconomic status, while vertical inequity (VI) is indirect form of injustice when children with differential health needs and risks exposure do not receive appropriately unequal but equitable immunisation. Using Indirect Standardisation Method and Erreygers' Corrected Concentration Index, we measure the degree of horizontal and vertical inequities, and then linearly decompose them to identify the major factors contributing towards the respective indices.

Conclusion: Our findings show that incomplete immunization is significantly concentrated among children belonging to poorer households. After controlling for the confounding effects of need factors, the inequity is still significantly pro-poor (i.e., horizontal inequity). The decomposition reveals that lower education, lower consumption and rural habitation are the major factors driving the corresponding inequity. Further, the differential effect of the needs between all and the target groups (at least based on education), is observed, however, is not statistically significant enough to realize inequity (i.e., no vertical inequity). Overall, the inequity is being induced via non-need factors. We further find that community health services (like anganwadi) have contributed towards reducing the inequity in child immunization significantly. The paper highlights the policy recommendation that the child immunisation program should target factors driving HI and need to align their distribution in terms of risks exposures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童免疫接种中与社会经济有关的不公平现象:政策见解的横向和纵向维度。
背景:不全面的免疫接种有可能使弱势儿童,特别是社会经济弱势群体的儿童,感染可通过疫苗预防的疾病。只有按照公平原则有效分配免疫接种,计划才能实现社会效益最大化:实证研究基于印度全国抽样调查的单位层面数据:"社会消费:健康调查--全国抽样调查第 75 轮(2017-18 年)"数据库中的单位水平数据。这项全国性调查采用分层多阶段抽样方法,目的是使样本具有代表性。平等公平原则要求疫苗的分配应基于儿童的健康需求,而不考虑其社会经济和地区因素,该原则大致基于两个方面--横向公平和纵向公平。横向不公平(HI)是一种直接形式的不公平,即具有同等常规免疫需求的儿童因其社会经济地位而受到不同待遇;而纵向不公平(VI)是一种间接形式的不公平,即具有不同健康需求和风险暴露的儿童没有得到适当的不平等但公平的免疫接种。我们使用间接标准化方法和 Erreygers 校正集中指数来衡量横向和纵向不公平的程度,然后对其进行线性分解,以确定导致相应指数的主要因素:我们的研究结果表明,未完成免疫接种的儿童主要集中在贫困家庭。在控制了需求因素的混杂影响后,不公平现象仍明显有利于穷人(即横向不公平)。分解结果显示,教育程度较低、消费水平较低和居住在农村是造成相应不公平现象的主要因素。此外,还观察到所有群体和目标群体之间需求的不同影响(至少基于教育),但在统计上不足以实现不公平(即没有纵向不公平)。总体而言,不公平是由非需求因素引起的。我们进一步发现,社区卫生服务(如 anganwadi)在显著减少儿童免疫不公平方面做出了贡献。本文强调了一项政策建议,即儿童免疫接种计划应针对导致高危免疫接种的因素,并需要调整这些因素在风险暴露方面的分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of COVID-19 economic response policies in the MENA countries: lessons learned for Iran for future pandemics. Determinants of the economic burden of ART on the Italian NHS: insights from the Lombardy region. An analysis of factors influencing technical efficiency of health expenditures in China. Contracting with sequential care providers. Effect of health shocks on the absenteeism magnitude at work in Togo: is health insurance a mitigating factor?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1