Source-Specific PM2.5 and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Mortality.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400182
Tszshan Ma, Pablo Knobel, Michael Hadley, Elena Colicino, Heresh Amini, Alex Federman, Joel Schwartz, Kyle Steenland, Maayan Yitshak Sade
{"title":"Source-Specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Mortality.","authors":"Tszshan Ma, Pablo Knobel, Michael Hadley, Elena Colicino, Heresh Amini, Alex Federman, Joel Schwartz, Kyle Steenland, Maayan Yitshak Sade","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure is adversely linked to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, most studies focused on PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass rather than its chemical composition and specific sources. Particulate pollution sources can have distinct, cumulative, and potentially synergistic health impacts. We investigated the associations of source-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure with ASCVD mortality in the United States, considering the combined associations and regional variations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (including data from 65,838,403 participants) from 2000 to 2016. We estimated PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure using machine-learning models and attributed components to five source categories. We used Poisson survival models to assess the associations with the source categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher ASCVD mortality rate (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] per interquartile range increase) was associated with oil combustion (1.051 [1.049 to 1.052]), industrial pollution (1.054 [1.052 to 1.056]), coal and biomass burning (1.065 [1.062 to 1.067]), and motor vehicle pollution (1.044 [1.042 to 1.046]). These associations persisted even after limiting our sample to ZIP code-years with PM<sub>2.5</sub><9 μg/m<sup>3</sup> - the current National Ambient Air Quality Standard. In these areas the observed rate ratio for a one-unit increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass was 1.028 (95% CI, 1.026 to 1.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found higher ASCVD mortality rate associated with PM<sub>2.5</sub>, with differential effects across sources. These data highlight the importance of considering local population characteristics and exposure patterns when assessing health risks associated with PM<sub>2.5</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"3 12","pages":"EVIDoa2400182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure is adversely linked to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, most studies focused on PM2.5 mass rather than its chemical composition and specific sources. Particulate pollution sources can have distinct, cumulative, and potentially synergistic health impacts. We investigated the associations of source-specific PM2.5 exposure with ASCVD mortality in the United States, considering the combined associations and regional variations.

Methods: We used data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (including data from 65,838,403 participants) from 2000 to 2016. We estimated PM2.5 exposure using machine-learning models and attributed components to five source categories. We used Poisson survival models to assess the associations with the source categories.

Results: Higher ASCVD mortality rate (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] per interquartile range increase) was associated with oil combustion (1.051 [1.049 to 1.052]), industrial pollution (1.054 [1.052 to 1.056]), coal and biomass burning (1.065 [1.062 to 1.067]), and motor vehicle pollution (1.044 [1.042 to 1.046]). These associations persisted even after limiting our sample to ZIP code-years with PM2.5<9 μg/m3 - the current National Ambient Air Quality Standard. In these areas the observed rate ratio for a one-unit increase in PM2.5 mass was 1.028 (95% CI, 1.026 to 1.029).

Conclusions: We found higher ASCVD mortality rate associated with PM2.5, with differential effects across sources. These data highlight the importance of considering local population characteristics and exposure patterns when assessing health risks associated with PM2.5.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特定来源的 PM2.5 与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病死亡率。
背景:细颗粒物(PM2.5)暴露与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)有不利联系。然而,大多数研究关注的是 PM2.5 的质量,而不是其化学成分和具体来源。颗粒物污染源会对健康产生不同的、累积的和潜在的协同影响。我们调查了美国特定来源的 PM2.5 暴露与 ASCVD 死亡率之间的关联,同时考虑了综合关联和地区差异:我们使用了美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 2000 年至 2016 年的数据(包括 65,838,403 名参与者的数据)。我们使用机器学习模型估算了 PM2.5 暴露量,并将成分归于五个来源类别。我们使用泊松生存模型来评估与来源类别的关联:结果:较高的 ASCVD 死亡率(比率比 [95% 置信区间 (CI)])与石油燃烧(1.051 [1.049 至 1.052])、工业污染(1.054 [1.052 至 1.056])、煤炭和生物质燃烧(1.065 [1.062 至 1.067])以及机动车污染(1.044 [1.042 至 1.046])相关。即使我们将样本限制在 PM2.53(目前的国家环境空气质量标准)的 ZIP 代码年,这些关联仍然存在。在这些地区,PM2.5质量每增加一个单位,观察到的比率比为1.028(95% CI,1.026至1.029):我们发现较高的 ASCVD 死亡率与 PM2.5 有关,不同来源的影响不同。这些数据强调了在评估与 PM2.5 相关的健康风险时考虑当地人口特征和暴露模式的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Pressure Targets for Adults with Vasodilatory Shock - An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. BNC210, an α7 Nicotinic Receptor Modulator, in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. A Meta-Analysis of Levofloxacin for Contacts of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Treating Patients, Not P Values. A 50-Year-Old Man with Left-Sided Weakness and Difficulty Speaking Clearly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1