David Oliver: The current stand-off may leave physician associates stranded

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2613
David Oliver
{"title":"David Oliver: The current stand-off may leave physician associates stranded","authors":"David Oliver","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This year has seen much controversy around plans to expand the numbers of medical associate professionals (MAPs) in the NHS—mainly physician associates (PAs) but also surgical care practitioners and anaesthesia associates. On 20 November the government announced a commissioned review into PA and anaesthesia associate professions,1 focusing on safety and their appropriate roles within services and wider health teams. The health secretary, Wes Streeting, said that he aimed to end “toxic debate” over the issue.2 In my view the current impasse could leave MAPs, especially PAs not already in post, stuck with limited employment prospects, while those already in post face far greater scrutiny over their scope of practice. The NHS workforce plan,3 published in June 2023, was explicitly structured around training and retaining more staff and “reforming” how staff work, the mix of skills in teams, and a proposed shift towards more community models and digitally enabled care. Delegation or expansion of clinical professional roles, role substitution, and the creation and expansion of newer roles were all part of the thinking. Meanwhile, the long expected General Medical Council …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This year has seen much controversy around plans to expand the numbers of medical associate professionals (MAPs) in the NHS—mainly physician associates (PAs) but also surgical care practitioners and anaesthesia associates. On 20 November the government announced a commissioned review into PA and anaesthesia associate professions,1 focusing on safety and their appropriate roles within services and wider health teams. The health secretary, Wes Streeting, said that he aimed to end “toxic debate” over the issue.2 In my view the current impasse could leave MAPs, especially PAs not already in post, stuck with limited employment prospects, while those already in post face far greater scrutiny over their scope of practice. The NHS workforce plan,3 published in June 2023, was explicitly structured around training and retaining more staff and “reforming” how staff work, the mix of skills in teams, and a proposed shift towards more community models and digitally enabled care. Delegation or expansion of clinical professional roles, role substitution, and the creation and expansion of newer roles were all part of the thinking. Meanwhile, the long expected General Medical Council …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戴维-奥利弗目前的僵局可能会使医生同事陷入困境
今年,围绕扩大国民医疗服务体系中医疗辅助专业人员(MAPs)--主要是内科辅助人员(PAs),但也包括外科护理从业人员和麻醉辅助人员--数量的计划引发了许多争议。11 月 20 日,政府宣布委托对助理医师和助理麻醉师职业进行审查1 ,重点是安全性及其在服务和更广泛的医疗团队中的适当角色。2 在我看来,目前的僵局可能会让助理医师,尤其是尚未在岗的助理医师,陷入就业前景有限的困境,而已经在岗的助理医师则面临着更严格的执业范围审查。2023 年 6 月发布的国民医疗服务体系劳动力计划3 明确围绕着培训和留住更多员工、"改革 "员工的工作方式、团队中的技能组合以及向更多社区模式和数字化护理的拟议转变。临床专业角色的授权或扩展、角色替代以及新角色的创建和扩展都是思考的一部分。与此同时,人们期待已久的英国医学总会(General Medical Council ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating smoke-free spaces: who is affected by legislation? What is “man flu”? Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management—summary of updated NICE guidance David Oliver: The current stand-off may leave physician associates stranded Mark Ashworth: “cycling” GP and researcher who recognised the power of big data to transform healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1