Safety, pharmacokinetics, and early bactericidal activity of quabodepistat in combination with delamanid, bedaquiline, or both in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis: a randomised, active-controlled, open-label trial

IF 36.4 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Lancet Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00601-7
Rodney Dawson, Andreas H Diacon, Veronique De Jager, Kim Narunsky, V Mischka Moodley, Kelly W Stinson, Yongge Liu, Bo Zheng, Jeffrey Hafkin
{"title":"Safety, pharmacokinetics, and early bactericidal activity of quabodepistat in combination with delamanid, bedaquiline, or both in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis: a randomised, active-controlled, open-label trial","authors":"Rodney Dawson, Andreas H Diacon, Veronique De Jager, Kim Narunsky, V Mischka Moodley, Kelly W Stinson, Yongge Liu, Bo Zheng, Jeffrey Hafkin","doi":"10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00601-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Quabodepistat (formerly OPC-167832) showed potent activity in preclinical studies and in the first stage of an early bactericidal activity study in adults with smear-positive, drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. Stage 2 of this study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and early bactericidal activity of quabodepistat in combination with delamanid, bedaquiline, or both versus rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide combination therapy for 14 days.<h3>Methods</h3>Stage 2 of this open-label, active-controlled, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted at two research sites in South Africa in adults (aged 18–64 years) with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. Eligible participants had a BMI of 16–32 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and the ability to produce an adequate volume of sputum (≥10 mL overnight) and were excluded if they had drug-resistant tuberculosis or previous treatment for <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> within the past 3 years. Participants were centrally randomly assigned via interactive web response technology system, with no stratification, into four treatment groups in a ratio of 14:14:14:4 (quabodepistat 30 mg plus delamanid 300 mg, quabodepistat 30 mg plus bedaquiline 400 mg, or quabodepistat 30 mg plus delamanid 300 mg plus bedaquiline 400 mg orally once daily for 14 days, or rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide combination therapy [control] according to local standard of care for 20 days). The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability during and after 14 days of treatment in all participants who received any study medication and pharmacokinetics at day 1 and day 14 in participants in the quabodepistat groups with adequate data for deriving pharmacokinetics parameters. The main secondary outcome was bactericidal activity from baseline to day 14 in all eligible participants who were quantitatively culture-positive at baseline. The study was not powered for formal statistical hypothesis testing; therefore, data were summarised by treatment group with descriptive statistics. This study is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT03678688</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>) and is closed to new participants.<h3>Findings</h3>98 participants were screened for entry into stage 2 of the trial between Feb 1, 2021, and Jan 27, 2022, of whom 46 were randomly assigned (14 to each quabodepistat group, 4 to the control group) and 44 received at least one dose of study medication (one patient excluded from the quabodepistat plus delamanid and quabodepistat plus bedaquiline groups). 32 (73%) of 44 participants had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Most events (30/32 [94%]) were mild or moderate; the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥2 participants; not related to study drugs) were headache (4/44 [9%]), dizziness (3/44 [7%]), abdominal pain (2/44 [5%]), pruritus (2/44 [5%]), and nausea (2/44 [5%]). Two serious adverse events were reported in two participants in the quabodepistat and bedaquiline cohort (anal abscess [n=1], pneumothorax [n=1]); both were deemed not related to study drug. Quabodepistat exposure was minimally affected by coadministration of delamanid or bedaquiline, with lower exposure in the quabodepistat and bedaquiline cohorts (maximum plasma concentration for quabodepistat plus delamanid 208 ng/mL [SD 61; n=11]; quabodepistat plus bedaquiline 175 ng/mL [31; n=10]; quabodepistat plus delamanid plus bedaquiline 183 ng/mL [52; n=11]). Maximum quabodepistat concentrations were achieved approximately 3 h after administration in all combinations. Mean elimination half-life was shorter in combinations with bedaquiline than without bedaquiline (12·3–14·5 h <em>vs</em> 15·2 h). Mean changes from baseline to day 14 of sputum log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming units per mL were −2·73 (SD 1·51) for quabodepistat plus delamanid plus bedaquiline (n=12) and −2·71 (SD 0·92) for control (n=19); mean change was −2·17 (SD 1·83) in the quabodepistat plus delamanid cohort (n=11) and −1·97 (SD 1·29) in the quabodepistat plus bedaquiline cohort (n=11).<h3>Interpretation</h3>In this 14-day trial, quabodepistat plus delamanid plus bedaquiline, a novel three-drug combination, appeared to be safe, well tolerated, and provided robust early bactericidal activity in adults with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. Further evaluation is warranted.<h3>Funding</h3>Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development &amp; Commercialization and the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation.","PeriodicalId":49923,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00601-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Quabodepistat (formerly OPC-167832) showed potent activity in preclinical studies and in the first stage of an early bactericidal activity study in adults with smear-positive, drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. Stage 2 of this study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and early bactericidal activity of quabodepistat in combination with delamanid, bedaquiline, or both versus rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide combination therapy for 14 days.

Methods

Stage 2 of this open-label, active-controlled, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted at two research sites in South Africa in adults (aged 18–64 years) with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. Eligible participants had a BMI of 16–32 kg/m2 and the ability to produce an adequate volume of sputum (≥10 mL overnight) and were excluded if they had drug-resistant tuberculosis or previous treatment for Mycobacterium tuberculosis within the past 3 years. Participants were centrally randomly assigned via interactive web response technology system, with no stratification, into four treatment groups in a ratio of 14:14:14:4 (quabodepistat 30 mg plus delamanid 300 mg, quabodepistat 30 mg plus bedaquiline 400 mg, or quabodepistat 30 mg plus delamanid 300 mg plus bedaquiline 400 mg orally once daily for 14 days, or rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide combination therapy [control] according to local standard of care for 20 days). The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability during and after 14 days of treatment in all participants who received any study medication and pharmacokinetics at day 1 and day 14 in participants in the quabodepistat groups with adequate data for deriving pharmacokinetics parameters. The main secondary outcome was bactericidal activity from baseline to day 14 in all eligible participants who were quantitatively culture-positive at baseline. The study was not powered for formal statistical hypothesis testing; therefore, data were summarised by treatment group with descriptive statistics. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03678688) and is closed to new participants.

Findings

98 participants were screened for entry into stage 2 of the trial between Feb 1, 2021, and Jan 27, 2022, of whom 46 were randomly assigned (14 to each quabodepistat group, 4 to the control group) and 44 received at least one dose of study medication (one patient excluded from the quabodepistat plus delamanid and quabodepistat plus bedaquiline groups). 32 (73%) of 44 participants had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Most events (30/32 [94%]) were mild or moderate; the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥2 participants; not related to study drugs) were headache (4/44 [9%]), dizziness (3/44 [7%]), abdominal pain (2/44 [5%]), pruritus (2/44 [5%]), and nausea (2/44 [5%]). Two serious adverse events were reported in two participants in the quabodepistat and bedaquiline cohort (anal abscess [n=1], pneumothorax [n=1]); both were deemed not related to study drug. Quabodepistat exposure was minimally affected by coadministration of delamanid or bedaquiline, with lower exposure in the quabodepistat and bedaquiline cohorts (maximum plasma concentration for quabodepistat plus delamanid 208 ng/mL [SD 61; n=11]; quabodepistat plus bedaquiline 175 ng/mL [31; n=10]; quabodepistat plus delamanid plus bedaquiline 183 ng/mL [52; n=11]). Maximum quabodepistat concentrations were achieved approximately 3 h after administration in all combinations. Mean elimination half-life was shorter in combinations with bedaquiline than without bedaquiline (12·3–14·5 h vs 15·2 h). Mean changes from baseline to day 14 of sputum log10 colony-forming units per mL were −2·73 (SD 1·51) for quabodepistat plus delamanid plus bedaquiline (n=12) and −2·71 (SD 0·92) for control (n=19); mean change was −2·17 (SD 1·83) in the quabodepistat plus delamanid cohort (n=11) and −1·97 (SD 1·29) in the quabodepistat plus bedaquiline cohort (n=11).

Interpretation

In this 14-day trial, quabodepistat plus delamanid plus bedaquiline, a novel three-drug combination, appeared to be safe, well tolerated, and provided robust early bactericidal activity in adults with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. Further evaluation is warranted.

Funding

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在成人肺结核患者中将呱贝地平与地拉马尼、贝达喹啉或两者联合使用的安全性、药代动力学和早期杀菌活性:一项随机、主动对照、开放标签试验
背景夸博地匹司他(原名 OPC-167832)在临床前研究和早期杀菌活性研究的第一阶段中表现出了强大的活性,该研究针对的是涂片阳性、对药物敏感的成人肺结核患者。该研究的第二阶段旨在评估呱贝地平联合地拉米尼、贝达喹啉或两者与利福平、异烟肼、乙胺丁醇和吡嗪酰胺联合治疗 14 天的安全性、耐受性、药代动力学和早期杀菌活性。方法这项开放标签、主动对照、随机平行分组研究的第二阶段在南非的两个研究机构进行,研究对象是患有药物敏感性肺结核的成年人(18-64 岁)。符合条件的参与者体重指数(BMI)为 16-32 kg/m2,能够产生足够量的痰液(隔夜≥10 mL),如果患有耐药性肺结核或在过去 3 年内曾接受过结核分枝杆菌治疗,则被排除在外。参与者通过交互式网络响应技术系统集中随机分配到四个治疗组,比例为 14:14:14:4(呱博地司他30毫克加地拉那米德300毫克、呱博地司他30毫克加贝达喹啉400毫克或呱博地司他30毫克加地拉那米德300毫克加贝达喹啉400毫克,每日口服一次,共14天;或按当地治疗标准接受利福平、异烟肼、乙胺丁醇和吡嗪酰胺联合疗法[对照组],共20天)。主要研究结果是所有接受过任何研究药物治疗的参与者在治疗期间和治疗 14 天后的安全性和耐受性,以及有足够数据得出药代动力学参数的夸博地司他组参与者在治疗第 1 天和第 14 天的药代动力学。主要次要结果是基线培养阳性的所有合格参与者从基线到第 14 天的杀菌活性。该研究不具备进行正式统计假设检验的能力;因此,数据按治疗组进行了描述性统计汇总。研究结果在2021年2月1日至2022年1月27日期间筛选出98名参与者进入试验的第二阶段,其中46名参与者被随机分配(夸博地司他组各14名,对照组4名),44名参与者至少接受了一剂研究药物治疗(夸博地司他加地拉马尼组和夸博地司他加贝达喹啉组排除了一名患者)。44 名参与者中有 32 人(73%)至少出现过一次治疗突发不良事件。大多数不良事件(30/32 [94%])为轻度或中度;最常见的治疗突发不良事件(≥2名参与者;与研究药物无关)为头痛(4/44 [9%])、头晕(3/44 [7%])、腹痛(2/44 [5%])、瘙痒(2/44 [5%])和恶心(2/44 [5%])。在喹莫地司他和贝达喹啉队列中,有两名参与者报告了两例严重不良事件(肛门脓肿[n=1]、气胸[n=1]);这两例不良事件均被认为与研究药物无关。喹诺地平的暴露量受合用德拉马尼或贝达喹啉的影响很小,喹诺地平和贝达喹啉组的暴露量较低(喹诺地平加德拉马尼的最大血浆浓度为 208 ng/mL [SD 61;n=11]; quabodepistat plus bedaquiline 175 ng/mL [31; n=10]; quabodepistat plus delamanid plus bedaquiline 183 ng/mL [52; n=11])。所有组合在用药后约 3 小时达到最大的卡博司他浓度。与不含贝达喹啉的药物相比,含贝达喹啉的组合药物的平均消除半衰期更短(12-3-14-5 h vs 15-2 h)。从基线到第14天,痰中每毫升log10菌落形成单位的平均变化为:喹博地匹加地拉米尼加贝达喹啉(12人)-2-73(SD 1-51),对照组(19人)-2-71(SD 0-92);喹莫地平加地拉马尼组(11人)的平均变化为-2-17(SD 1-83),喹莫地平加贝达喹啉组(11人)的平均变化为-1-97(SD 1-29)。解读在这项为期14天的试验中,喹莫地平+地拉那米德+贝达喹啉这种新型三药联合疗法似乎安全、耐受性良好,并能为成人药敏肺结核患者提供强大的早期杀菌活性。还需要进行进一步的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Infectious Diseases
Lancet Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
60.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
1064
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Infectious Diseases was launched in August, 2001, and is a lively monthly journal of original research, review, opinion, and news covering international issues relevant to clinical infectious diseases specialists worldwide.The infectious diseases journal aims to be a world-leading publication, featuring original research that advocates change or sheds light on clinical practices related to infectious diseases. The journal prioritizes articles with the potential to impact clinical practice or influence perspectives. Content covers a wide range of topics, including anti-infective therapy and immunization, bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections, emerging infectious diseases, HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, mycobacterial infections, infection control, infectious diseases epidemiology, neglected tropical diseases, and travel medicine. Informative reviews on any subject linked to infectious diseases and human health are also welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Learning from AIDS for NCD control Spreading awareness about HIV transmission Monkeypox virus isolation from longitudinal samples in 11 hospitalised patients Mortality in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis Estimating mortality in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1