Flatness constraints in the estimation of GNSS satellite antenna phase center offsets and variations

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geodesy Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1007/s00190-024-01919-1
Bingbing Duan, Urs Hugentobler, Oliver Montenbruck, Peter Steigenberger, Arturo Villiger
{"title":"Flatness constraints in the estimation of GNSS satellite antenna phase center offsets and variations","authors":"Bingbing Duan, Urs Hugentobler, Oliver Montenbruck, Peter Steigenberger, Arturo Villiger","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01919-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate information on satellite antenna phase center offsets (PCOs) and phase variations (PVs) is indispensable for high-precision geodetic applications. In the absence of consistent pre-flight calibrations, satellite antenna PCOs and PVs of global navigation satellite systems are commonly estimated based on observations from a global network, constraining the scale to a given reference frame. As part of this estimation, flatness and zero-mean conditions need to be applied to unambiguously separate PCOs, PVs, and constant phase ambiguities. Within this study, we analytically investigate the impact of different boresight-angle-dependent weighting functions for PV minimization, and we compare antenna models generated with different observation-based weighting schemes with those based on uniform weighting. For the case of the GPS IIR/-M and III satellites, systematic differences of 10 mm in the PVs and 65 cm in the corresponding PCOs are identified. In addition, new antenna models for the different blocks of BeiDou-3 satellites in medium Earth orbit are derived using different processing schemes. As a drawback of traditional approaches estimating PCOs and PVs consecutively in distinct steps, it is shown that different, albeit self-consistent, PCO/PV pairs may result depending on whether PCOs or PVs are estimated first. This apparent discrepancy can be attributed to potentially inconsistent weighting functions in the individual processing steps. Use of a single-step process is therefore proposed, in which a dedicated constraint for PCO-PV separation is applied in the solution of the normal equations. Finally, the impact of neglecting phase patterns in precise point positioning applications is investigated. In addition to an overall increase of the position scatter, the occurrence of systematic height biases is illustrated. While observation-based weighting in the pattern estimation can help to avoid such biases, the possible benefit depends critically on the specific elevation-dependent weighting applied in the user’s positioning model. As such, the practical advantage of such antenna models would remain limited, and uniform weighting is recommended as a lean and transparent approach for the pattern estimation of satellite antenna models from observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01919-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate information on satellite antenna phase center offsets (PCOs) and phase variations (PVs) is indispensable for high-precision geodetic applications. In the absence of consistent pre-flight calibrations, satellite antenna PCOs and PVs of global navigation satellite systems are commonly estimated based on observations from a global network, constraining the scale to a given reference frame. As part of this estimation, flatness and zero-mean conditions need to be applied to unambiguously separate PCOs, PVs, and constant phase ambiguities. Within this study, we analytically investigate the impact of different boresight-angle-dependent weighting functions for PV minimization, and we compare antenna models generated with different observation-based weighting schemes with those based on uniform weighting. For the case of the GPS IIR/-M and III satellites, systematic differences of 10 mm in the PVs and 65 cm in the corresponding PCOs are identified. In addition, new antenna models for the different blocks of BeiDou-3 satellites in medium Earth orbit are derived using different processing schemes. As a drawback of traditional approaches estimating PCOs and PVs consecutively in distinct steps, it is shown that different, albeit self-consistent, PCO/PV pairs may result depending on whether PCOs or PVs are estimated first. This apparent discrepancy can be attributed to potentially inconsistent weighting functions in the individual processing steps. Use of a single-step process is therefore proposed, in which a dedicated constraint for PCO-PV separation is applied in the solution of the normal equations. Finally, the impact of neglecting phase patterns in precise point positioning applications is investigated. In addition to an overall increase of the position scatter, the occurrence of systematic height biases is illustrated. While observation-based weighting in the pattern estimation can help to avoid such biases, the possible benefit depends critically on the specific elevation-dependent weighting applied in the user’s positioning model. As such, the practical advantage of such antenna models would remain limited, and uniform weighting is recommended as a lean and transparent approach for the pattern estimation of satellite antenna models from observations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算全球导航卫星系统卫星天线相位中心偏移和变化时的平整度制约因素
卫星天线相位中心偏移(PCOs)和相位变化(PVs)的准确信息对于高精度大地测量应用是不可或缺的。在缺乏一致的飞行前校准的情况下,全球导航卫星系统的卫星天线相位中心偏移和相位变化通常是根据全球网络的观测数据估算的,并将比例限制在给定的参考框架内。作为估算的一部分,需要应用平整度和零均值条件来明确区分 PCO、PV 和恒定相位模糊。在这项研究中,我们通过分析研究了不同的与孔径角度相关的加权函数对 PV 最小化的影响,并比较了使用不同的基于观测的加权方案和基于均匀加权的方案生成的天线模型。对于 GPS IIR/-M 和 III 号卫星,我们发现 PV 和相应 PCO 的系统差异分别为 10 毫米和 65 厘米。此外,还利用不同的处理方案为中地球轨道上的北斗三号卫星的不同区块推导出了新的天线模型。传统方法在不同步骤中连续估算 PCO 和 PV,这种方法的一个缺点是,根据先估算 PCO 还是先估算 PV,可能会产生不同的 PCO/PV 对,尽管它们是自洽的。这种明显的差异可归因于各个处理步骤中可能不一致的加权函数。因此,建议使用单步流程,即在求解正则方程时应用 PCO-PV 分离的专用约束条件。最后,研究了在精确点定位应用中忽略相位模式的影响。除了位置散度的整体增加外,还说明了系统高度偏差的出现。虽然在模式估算中基于观测的加权可以帮助避免这种偏差,但其可能带来的好处主要取决于用户定位模型中应用的特定海拔加权。因此,这种天线模型的实际优势仍然有限,建议采用统一加权法,作为根据观测数据对卫星天线模型进行模式估算的一种简便、透明的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
期刊最新文献
A machine learning-based partial ambiguity resolution method for precise positioning in challenging environments On the feasibility of retrieving the temporal gravity field via improved optical clocks From one-dimensional to three-dimensional: effect of lateral inhomogeneity on tidal gravity and its implications for lithospheric strength Regional sea level budget around Taiwan and Philippines over 2002‒2021 inferred from GRACE, altimetry, and in-situ hydrographic data Finite volume method: a good match to airborne gravimetry?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1