Acute effects of myofascial release technique on flexibility and pain: Outcome for chronic low back pain

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.035
Ozan Çetinyol , Seda Saka , Ayşenur Çetinkaya
{"title":"Acute effects of myofascial release technique on flexibility and pain: Outcome for chronic low back pain","authors":"Ozan Çetinyol ,&nbsp;Seda Saka ,&nbsp;Ayşenur Çetinkaya","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Myofascial release technique (MFR) is frequently used in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), but there are limited studies on the acute effects of this technique. It was aimed to determine the acute effect of MFR technique on pain and flexibility in CLBP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty CLBP patients (19 female; 21 male) with an average age of 40 years were randomized as MFR technique and classical massage groups. A single session of technique was applied to each group. Outcome measurements consisted of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Sit and Reach Test (SRT), Straight Leg Raise Test (SLRT), and Modified Schober Test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In within-group comparisons, all outcome measures (except right-SLRT) improved statistically significantly in both groups after interventions (p˂0.05). ANCOVA was conducted to determine whether there were significant differences in between groups after intervention while controlling for age. The analysis showed that VAS, SRT and left-SLRT results were significantly more improved after the MFR technique compared with classical massage (p˂0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, the MFR technique is a safe and effective method for the immediate relief of pain and the enhancement of flexibility. Furthermore, it demonstrates superior efficacy in pain relief and flexibility improvement compared to classical massage, which is another manual therapy technique.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 194-198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224005369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Myofascial release technique (MFR) is frequently used in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), but there are limited studies on the acute effects of this technique. It was aimed to determine the acute effect of MFR technique on pain and flexibility in CLBP.

Methods

Forty CLBP patients (19 female; 21 male) with an average age of 40 years were randomized as MFR technique and classical massage groups. A single session of technique was applied to each group. Outcome measurements consisted of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Sit and Reach Test (SRT), Straight Leg Raise Test (SLRT), and Modified Schober Test.

Results

In within-group comparisons, all outcome measures (except right-SLRT) improved statistically significantly in both groups after interventions (p˂0.05). ANCOVA was conducted to determine whether there were significant differences in between groups after intervention while controlling for age. The analysis showed that VAS, SRT and left-SLRT results were significantly more improved after the MFR technique compared with classical massage (p˂0.05).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the MFR technique is a safe and effective method for the immediate relief of pain and the enhancement of flexibility. Furthermore, it demonstrates superior efficacy in pain relief and flexibility improvement compared to classical massage, which is another manual therapy technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌筋膜释放技术对柔韧性和疼痛的急性影响:慢性腰背痛的治疗效果
背景肌筋膜松解技术(MFR)常用于慢性腰背痛(CLBP)患者的治疗,但有关该技术急性期效果的研究却很有限。方法将 40 名平均年龄为 40 岁的慢性腰背痛患者(19 名女性;21 名男性)随机分为肌筋膜松解术组和传统按摩组。每组各进行一次按摩。结果测量包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、坐位和前伸试验(SRT)、直腿抬高试验(SLRT)和改良舒伯试验。结果在组内比较中,两组在干预后所有结果测量(除右侧-SLRT)均有显著的统计学改善(p˂0.05)。在控制年龄的前提下,进行方差分析以确定干预后组间是否存在明显差异。分析表明,与传统按摩相比,MFR 技术对 VAS、SRT 和左侧-SLRT 结果的改善幅度更大(p˂0.05)。此外,与传统按摩(另一种手法治疗技术)相比,它在缓解疼痛和改善柔韧性方面具有更优越的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of foam rolling with and without vibration and static stretching on range of motion, muscle strength and proprioception of the ankle joint in adults with chronic ankle instability Investigating the impact of various insole applications on balance and postural stability in the elderly Clustering of shoulder movement patterns using K-means algorithm based on the shoulder range of motion Cyclic yoga improves anthropometric indices, musculoskeletal disorders, and blood pressure in middle-aged women Assessing the magnitude and direction of asymmetry in physical tests and morphological measurements in professional female soccer athletes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1