{"title":"Non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families","authors":"Yang Huang, Yuejian Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.jcta.2024.105981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Two families <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>B</mi></math></span> are cross-intersecting if <span><math><mi>A</mi><mo>∩</mo><mi>B</mi><mo>≠</mo><mo>∅</mo></math></span> for any <span><math><mi>A</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>B</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>B</mi></math></span>. We call <em>t</em> families <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> pairwise cross-intersecting families if <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> are cross-intersecting for <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>≤</mo><mi>i</mi><mo><</mo><mi>j</mi><mo>≤</mo><mi>t</mi></math></span>. Additionally, if <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>≠</mo><mo>∅</mo></math></span> for each <span><math><mi>j</mi><mo>∈</mo><mo>[</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>]</mo></math></span>, then we say that <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> are non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting. Let <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>⊆</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mo>[</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>⊆</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mo>[</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub><mo>⊆</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mo>[</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> be non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families with <span><math><mi>t</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>2</mn></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≥</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≥</mo><mo>⋯</mo><mo>≥</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><mi>n</mi><mo>≥</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> be positive numbers. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound of <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mo>∑</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msubsup><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo></math></span> and characterize the families <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> attaining the upper bound. Our results unifies results of Frankl and Tokushige (1992) <span><span>[5]</span></span>, Shi, Frankl and Qian (2022) <span><span>[15]</span></span>, Huang, Peng and Wang <span><span>[10]</span></span>, and Zhang and Feng <span><span>[16]</span></span>. Furthermore, our result can be applied in the treatment for some <span><math><mi>n</mi><mo><</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> while all previous known results do not have such an application. In the proof, a result of Kruskal and Katona is applied to allow us to consider only families <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> whose elements are the first <span><math><mo>|</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo></math></span> elements in lexicographic order. We bound <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mo>∑</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msubsup><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo></math></span> by a single variable function <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>R</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>, where <em>R</em> is the last element of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> in lexicographic order, and verify that <span><math><mo>−</mo><msub><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>R</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> has unimodality which is stronger than the extremal result. We think that the unimodality of functions in this paper is interesting in its own, in addition to the extremal result.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 105981"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097316524001201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Two families and are cross-intersecting if for any and . We call t families pairwise cross-intersecting families if and are cross-intersecting for . Additionally, if for each , then we say that are non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting. Let be non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families with , , and be positive numbers. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound of and characterize the families attaining the upper bound. Our results unifies results of Frankl and Tokushige (1992) [5], Shi, Frankl and Qian (2022) [15], Huang, Peng and Wang [10], and Zhang and Feng [16]. Furthermore, our result can be applied in the treatment for some while all previous known results do not have such an application. In the proof, a result of Kruskal and Katona is applied to allow us to consider only families whose elements are the first elements in lexicographic order. We bound by a single variable function , where R is the last element of in lexicographic order, and verify that has unimodality which is stronger than the extremal result. We think that the unimodality of functions in this paper is interesting in its own, in addition to the extremal result.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Combinatorial Theory publishes original mathematical research concerned with theoretical and physical aspects of the study of finite and discrete structures in all branches of science. Series A is concerned primarily with structures, designs, and applications of combinatorics and is a valuable tool for mathematicians and computer scientists.