Sex-specific poor physical performance in Korean community-dwelling older adults

Kai Wang , Suyeon Kim , Taehyun Song , Seongryu Bae , Hyuntae Park , S. Jun Son
{"title":"Sex-specific poor physical performance in Korean community-dwelling older adults","authors":"Kai Wang ,&nbsp;Suyeon Kim ,&nbsp;Taehyun Song ,&nbsp;Seongryu Bae ,&nbsp;Hyuntae Park ,&nbsp;S. Jun Son","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2024.112636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Poor physical performance appears to be different across age and sex. The aim of this study was to examine changes in physical performance across age groups by sex.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 292 community-dwelling older adults (144 males, 148 females; age: 74.7 ± 5.2 years, body mass index: 23.8 ± 2.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Physical performance tests included (i) strength (handgrip, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, ankle plantarflexion, and toe grip), (ii) functional mobility (5 sit-to-stand, 4-m gait speed, and 4-m fast gait speed), and (iii) postural control (timed single-leg stance). Physical performance was compared across four different age groups by sex using ANOVA tests, T-score, and linear regression analysis. All statistical analysis was set at 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ANOVA showed a significant age effect (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) on physical performance measures with only exception for ankle muscle strength. T-score and linear regression analyses revealed sex-specific trends. In males, postural control showed the most significant poor performance, followed by strength. In females, the most notable poor performance was also observed in postural control, followed by functional mobility.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most main outcome measures in physical performance worsened over time across age groups while poor performance pattern was different between older males (strength) and females (functional mobility). We highlighted the importance of assessing strength, functional mobility, and postural control in older adults. Based on observed poor performance patterns across age groups by sex, sex-specific interventions should be implemented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 112636"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556524002821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Poor physical performance appears to be different across age and sex. The aim of this study was to examine changes in physical performance across age groups by sex.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 292 community-dwelling older adults (144 males, 148 females; age: 74.7 ± 5.2 years, body mass index: 23.8 ± 2.7 kg/m2). Physical performance tests included (i) strength (handgrip, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, ankle plantarflexion, and toe grip), (ii) functional mobility (5 sit-to-stand, 4-m gait speed, and 4-m fast gait speed), and (iii) postural control (timed single-leg stance). Physical performance was compared across four different age groups by sex using ANOVA tests, T-score, and linear regression analysis. All statistical analysis was set at 0.05.

Results

ANOVA showed a significant age effect (p < 0.05) on physical performance measures with only exception for ankle muscle strength. T-score and linear regression analyses revealed sex-specific trends. In males, postural control showed the most significant poor performance, followed by strength. In females, the most notable poor performance was also observed in postural control, followed by functional mobility.

Conclusions

Most main outcome measures in physical performance worsened over time across age groups while poor performance pattern was different between older males (strength) and females (functional mobility). We highlighted the importance of assessing strength, functional mobility, and postural control in older adults. Based on observed poor performance patterns across age groups by sex, sex-specific interventions should be implemented.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国社区老年人因性别而异的不良体能表现
背景不同年龄和性别的人体能表现似乎有所不同。本研究的目的是研究不同年龄组的体能表现在性别上的变化。方法对 292 名居住在社区的老年人(男性 144 人,女性 148 人;年龄:74.7 ± 5.2 岁,体重指数:23.8 ± 2.7 kg/m2)进行了横断面研究:23.8 ± 2.7 kg/m2)。体能测试包括:(i) 力量(手握力、膝关节伸展力、踝关节背屈力、踝关节跖屈力和脚趾握力);(ii) 功能活动能力(5次坐立、4米步速和4米快速步速);(iii) 姿势控制(计时单腿站立)。通过方差分析、T-score 和线性回归分析,对四个不同年龄组的体能表现进行了性别比较。结果方差分析显示,年龄对体能表现有显著影响(p < 0.05),只有踝关节肌力例外。T 评分和线性回归分析显示了性别特异性趋势。在男性中,姿势控制表现最差,其次是力量。结论随着时间的推移,不同年龄组的大多数体能表现主要指标都有所下降,而老年男性(力量)和女性(功能活动)的体能表现则有所不同。我们强调了评估老年人力量、功能活动能力和姿势控制能力的重要性。根据观察到的不同年龄组性别的不良表现模式,应实施针对不同性别的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Lower extremity muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in older adults: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials Effects of precision health management combined with dual-energy bone densitometer treatment on bone biomarkers in senile osteoporosis patients Sex differences in mortality risk and U-shaped relationship with klotho levels: A long-term cohort study Immediate effects of structured and natural deep breathing on heart rate variability and blood pressure in community-dwelling older adults Sex-specific poor physical performance in Korean community-dwelling older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1