The intangible technological innovation system: The role and influence of voluntary and compliance carbon markets on carbon dioxide removal in the European Union

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103851
Nick Deknatel, Adriaan van der Loos
{"title":"The intangible technological innovation system: The role and influence of voluntary and compliance carbon markets on carbon dioxide removal in the European Union","authors":"Nick Deknatel,&nbsp;Adriaan van der Loos","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Limiting global temperature rise requires many carbon mitigation solutions, including carbon dioxide removal (CDR); however, commercial deployment of CDR is limited. Due to the intangible nature of negative carbon, market formation is challenging. This research analyzes the CDR technological innovation system in the European Union to unravel how market formation for such products can occur. The research focuses on voluntary (soft) and compliance (hard) carbon market institutions to understand their impact on the development of intangible products. Interviews were conducted with 26 CDR experts, complemented by a separate survey. Our results show that private certification programs governed by soft institutions are crucial in driving demand in the early market phase; subsequently, stringent market formation mechanisms governed by hard institutions will be essential to foster market acceleration. However, the exact shape of hard institutions is not yet clear. Overall, a combination of soft and hard institutions is crucial for market formation and diffusion of CDR technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103851"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004420","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limiting global temperature rise requires many carbon mitigation solutions, including carbon dioxide removal (CDR); however, commercial deployment of CDR is limited. Due to the intangible nature of negative carbon, market formation is challenging. This research analyzes the CDR technological innovation system in the European Union to unravel how market formation for such products can occur. The research focuses on voluntary (soft) and compliance (hard) carbon market institutions to understand their impact on the development of intangible products. Interviews were conducted with 26 CDR experts, complemented by a separate survey. Our results show that private certification programs governed by soft institutions are crucial in driving demand in the early market phase; subsequently, stringent market formation mechanisms governed by hard institutions will be essential to foster market acceleration. However, the exact shape of hard institutions is not yet clear. Overall, a combination of soft and hard institutions is crucial for market formation and diffusion of CDR technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无形技术创新体系:自愿和履约碳市场对欧盟二氧化碳减排的作用和影响
限制全球气温上升需要许多碳减排解决方案,其中包括二氧化碳清除(CDR);然而,CDR 的商业应用非常有限。由于负碳的无形性,市场形成具有挑战性。本研究分析了欧盟的 CDR 技术创新体系,以揭示此类产品的市场形成过程。研究重点关注自愿(软)和履约(硬)碳市场机构,以了解它们对无形产品开发的影响。我们对 26 位 CDR 专家进行了访谈,并进行了单独调查。我们的研究结果表明,在早期市场阶段,由软机构管理的私人认证项目对推动需求至关重要;随后,由硬机构管理的严格市场形成机制对促进市场加速发展至关重要。然而,硬性制度的具体形式尚不明确。总体而言,软、硬制度的结合对于 CDR 技术的市场形成和推广至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Desert or garden? Energy sacrifice zones, territorial affordances and competing visions for post-coal landscapes: The case of the Czechoslovak Army Mine Retrofit information challenges and potential solutions: Perspectives of households, retrofit professionals and local policy makers in the United Kingdom Institutional entrepreneuring for energy poverty: The role of boundary work in developing a collaborative product-service system for household appliances A technology to solve the water-energy-food crisis? Mapping sociotechnical configurations of agrivoltaics using Q-methodology Justice or just plans? Reviewing the energy transition strategy of Brazil's Ceará state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1