The EGS Collab project: Outcomes and lessons learned from hydraulic fracture stimulations in crystalline rock at 1.25 and 1.5 km depth

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geothermics Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103178
Tim Kneafsey , Pat Dobson , Doug Blankenship , Paul Schwering , Mark White , Joseph P. Morris , Lianjie Huang , Tim Johnson , Jeff Burghardt , Earl Mattson , Ghanashyam Neupane , Chris Strickland , Hunter Knox , Vince Vermuel , Jonathan Ajo-Franklin , Pengcheng Fu , William Roggenthen , Tom Doe , Martin Schoenball , Chet Hopp , Michelle Robertson
{"title":"The EGS Collab project: Outcomes and lessons learned from hydraulic fracture stimulations in crystalline rock at 1.25 and 1.5 km depth","authors":"Tim Kneafsey ,&nbsp;Pat Dobson ,&nbsp;Doug Blankenship ,&nbsp;Paul Schwering ,&nbsp;Mark White ,&nbsp;Joseph P. Morris ,&nbsp;Lianjie Huang ,&nbsp;Tim Johnson ,&nbsp;Jeff Burghardt ,&nbsp;Earl Mattson ,&nbsp;Ghanashyam Neupane ,&nbsp;Chris Strickland ,&nbsp;Hunter Knox ,&nbsp;Vince Vermuel ,&nbsp;Jonathan Ajo-Franklin ,&nbsp;Pengcheng Fu ,&nbsp;William Roggenthen ,&nbsp;Tom Doe ,&nbsp;Martin Schoenball ,&nbsp;Chet Hopp ,&nbsp;Michelle Robertson","doi":"10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the goal of better understanding stimulation in crystalline rock for improving enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), the EGS Collab Project performed a series of stimulations and flow tests at 1.25 and 1.5 km depths. The tests were performed in two well-instrumented testbeds in the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota, United States. The testbed for Experiment 1 at 1.5 km depth contained two open wells for injection and production and six instrumented monitoring wells surrounding the targeted stimulation zone. Four multi-step stimulation tests targeting hydraulic fracturing and nearly year-long ambient temperature and chilled water flow tests were performed in Experiment 1. The testbed for Experiments 2 and 3 was at 1.25 km depth and contained five open wells in an outwardly fanning five-spot pattern and two fans of well-instrumented monitoring wells surrounding the targeted stimulation zone. Experiment 2 targeted shear stimulation, and Experiment 3 targeted low-flow, high-flow, and oscillating pressure stimulation strategies. Hydraulic fracturing was successful in Experiments 1 and 3 in generating a connected system wherein injected water could be collected. However, the resulting flow was distributed dynamically, and not entirely collected at the anticipated production well. Thermal breakthrough was not observed in the production well, but that could have been masked by the Joule-Thomson effect. Shear stimulation in Experiment 2 did not occur – despite attempting to pressurize the fractures most likely to shear – because of the inability to inject water into a mostly-healed fracture, and the low shear-to-normal stress ratio. The EGS Collab experiments are described to provide a background for lessons learned on topics including induced seismicity, the correlation between seismicity and permeability, distributed and dynamic flow systems, thermoelastic and pressure effects, shear stimulation, local geology, thermal breakthrough, monitoring stimulation, grouting boreholes, modeling, and system management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55095,"journal":{"name":"Geothermics","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 103178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geothermics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375650524002645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the goal of better understanding stimulation in crystalline rock for improving enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), the EGS Collab Project performed a series of stimulations and flow tests at 1.25 and 1.5 km depths. The tests were performed in two well-instrumented testbeds in the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota, United States. The testbed for Experiment 1 at 1.5 km depth contained two open wells for injection and production and six instrumented monitoring wells surrounding the targeted stimulation zone. Four multi-step stimulation tests targeting hydraulic fracturing and nearly year-long ambient temperature and chilled water flow tests were performed in Experiment 1. The testbed for Experiments 2 and 3 was at 1.25 km depth and contained five open wells in an outwardly fanning five-spot pattern and two fans of well-instrumented monitoring wells surrounding the targeted stimulation zone. Experiment 2 targeted shear stimulation, and Experiment 3 targeted low-flow, high-flow, and oscillating pressure stimulation strategies. Hydraulic fracturing was successful in Experiments 1 and 3 in generating a connected system wherein injected water could be collected. However, the resulting flow was distributed dynamically, and not entirely collected at the anticipated production well. Thermal breakthrough was not observed in the production well, but that could have been masked by the Joule-Thomson effect. Shear stimulation in Experiment 2 did not occur – despite attempting to pressurize the fractures most likely to shear – because of the inability to inject water into a mostly-healed fracture, and the low shear-to-normal stress ratio. The EGS Collab experiments are described to provide a background for lessons learned on topics including induced seismicity, the correlation between seismicity and permeability, distributed and dynamic flow systems, thermoelastic and pressure effects, shear stimulation, local geology, thermal breakthrough, monitoring stimulation, grouting boreholes, modeling, and system management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EGS Collab 项目:1.25 千米和 1.5 千米深度结晶岩水力压裂激励的成果和经验教训
为了更好地了解在结晶岩中激发地热以改善强化地热系统(EGS),EGS Collab 项目在 1.25 千米和 1.5 千米深处进行了一系列激发和流动试验。试验在美国南达科他州利德桑福德地下研究设施的两个仪器完善的试验台进行。位于 1.5 千米深处的试验 1 的试验台包含两口用于注入和生产的开放井,以及目标激励区周围的六口仪器监测井。实验 1 进行了四次水力压裂多步刺激试验以及近一年的环境温度和冷冻水流试验。实验 2 和实验 3 的试验台位于 1.25 千米深处,包括五口向外扇形分布的五点开放井,以及目标激励区周围两扇仪器完善的监测井。实验 2 的目标是剪切刺激,实验 3 的目标是低流量、高流量和振荡压力刺激策略。在实验 1 和 3 中,水力压裂成功地产生了一个可收集注入水的连通系统。然而,所产生的水流是动态分布的,并没有完全汇集到预期的生产井中。在生产井中没有观察到热突破,但这可能被焦耳-汤姆逊效应所掩盖。在实验 2 中,尽管尝试对最有可能发生剪切的裂缝进行加压,但由于无法向大部分愈合的裂缝注水,而且剪切应力与正常应力比很低,因此没有发生剪切激励。对 EGS Collab 实验进行了描述,以提供有关诱发地震、地震与渗透率之间的相关性、分布式和动态流动系统、热弹性和压力效应、剪切激励、局部地质、热突破、监测激励、灌浆井眼、建模和系统管理等主题的经验教训背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geothermics
Geothermics 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geothermics is an international journal devoted to the research and development of geothermal energy. The International Board of Editors of Geothermics, which comprises specialists in the various aspects of geothermal resources, exploration and development, guarantees the balanced, comprehensive view of scientific and technological developments in this promising energy field. It promulgates the state of the art and science of geothermal energy, its exploration and exploitation through a regular exchange of information from all parts of the world. The journal publishes articles dealing with the theory, exploration techniques and all aspects of the utilization of geothermal resources. Geothermics serves as the scientific house, or exchange medium, through which the growing community of geothermal specialists can provide and receive information.
期刊最新文献
Influence of transverse zones on the distribution of basement, tectonic configuration, and geothermal potential in the northern Perth basin, Australia Ground source heat pump systems in Central Asia: A case study from Dushanbe, Tajikistan Editorial Board Geothermal resources in the northern Harrat Rahat volcanic field, Saudi Arabia: A drilling and field data assessment Hydrochemical zonation and geochemical processes of geothermal water in Beijing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1