Narmeen Abd El Qadir , Harrison N. Jones , David A. Leiman , Kathryn N. Porter Starr , Seth M. Cohen , National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) Consortium
{"title":"Preoperative dysphagia and adverse postoperative outcomes in middle aged and older adults","authors":"Narmeen Abd El Qadir , Harrison N. Jones , David A. Leiman , Kathryn N. Porter Starr , Seth M. Cohen , National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dysphagia is a swallowing impairment with adverse health consequences. The impact of preoperative dysphagia on postoperative outcomes is not known. This study will examine the association between preoperative dysphagia and postoperative outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective, observational study of patients ≥50 years of age undergoing surgery not directly involving the swallowing mechanism (i.e., oral cavity, larynx, pharynx, or esophagus). The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) database from January 1st, 2020 to August 31st, 2023 was used. The N3C database comprises electronic health record (EHR) data from more than 75 US health systems and harmonizes these data in a centralized resource. The main predictor was dysphagia with or without malnutrition in the 3 months prior to surgery. Logistic regression models assessed the association between our main predictor and outcomes of mortality, readmission, and medical/surgical complications adjusted for covariates. A negative binomial regression model was used for length of stay (LOS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>380,869 adults ≥50 years old were included, mean age 66.0 (SD = 9.2), 52.6 % male. 7.9 % had dysphagia and/or malnutrition 3 months preoperatively including 3.0 % preoperative dysphagia alone, 3.8 % preoperative malnutrition alone, and 1.1 % both. Adjusted models demonstrated higher odds of mortality (1-year mortality odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.29 to 1.44), readmission (90-day readmission OR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.14 to 1.24), and medical/surgical complications (OR 1.35, 95 % CI 1.28 to 1.42) among patients with 3 months preoperative dysphagia with or without malnutrition compared to patients with neither condition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with 3 months preoperative dysphagia with and without malnutrition had poor postoperative outcomes. These findings highlight the rationale for integrating dysphagia screening and intervention into routine preoperative protocols to mitigate the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 111688"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024003179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Dysphagia is a swallowing impairment with adverse health consequences. The impact of preoperative dysphagia on postoperative outcomes is not known. This study will examine the association between preoperative dysphagia and postoperative outcomes.
Methods
This is a retrospective, observational study of patients ≥50 years of age undergoing surgery not directly involving the swallowing mechanism (i.e., oral cavity, larynx, pharynx, or esophagus). The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) database from January 1st, 2020 to August 31st, 2023 was used. The N3C database comprises electronic health record (EHR) data from more than 75 US health systems and harmonizes these data in a centralized resource. The main predictor was dysphagia with or without malnutrition in the 3 months prior to surgery. Logistic regression models assessed the association between our main predictor and outcomes of mortality, readmission, and medical/surgical complications adjusted for covariates. A negative binomial regression model was used for length of stay (LOS).
Results
380,869 adults ≥50 years old were included, mean age 66.0 (SD = 9.2), 52.6 % male. 7.9 % had dysphagia and/or malnutrition 3 months preoperatively including 3.0 % preoperative dysphagia alone, 3.8 % preoperative malnutrition alone, and 1.1 % both. Adjusted models demonstrated higher odds of mortality (1-year mortality odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.29 to 1.44), readmission (90-day readmission OR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.14 to 1.24), and medical/surgical complications (OR 1.35, 95 % CI 1.28 to 1.42) among patients with 3 months preoperative dysphagia with or without malnutrition compared to patients with neither condition.
Conclusion
Patients with 3 months preoperative dysphagia with and without malnutrition had poor postoperative outcomes. These findings highlight the rationale for integrating dysphagia screening and intervention into routine preoperative protocols to mitigate the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.