Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Neck Outcome Score Questionnaire in Iranian Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain

Mohammad Reza Tehrani PhD, PT , Seyed Ramin Dabiri MD , Afsaneh Zeinalzadeh PhD, PT , Hamed Mami-Pour MS, PT , Salman Nazary-Moghadam PhD, PT
{"title":"Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Neck Outcome Score Questionnaire in Iranian Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain","authors":"Mohammad Reza Tehrani PhD, PT ,&nbsp;Seyed Ramin Dabiri MD ,&nbsp;Afsaneh Zeinalzadeh PhD, PT ,&nbsp;Hamed Mami-Pour MS, PT ,&nbsp;Salman Nazary-Moghadam PhD, PT","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The primary purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the neck outcome score (NOOS) questionnaire into Persian language and investigate its reliability and validity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The NOOS questionnaire was translated into Persian language and culturally adapted according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain were requested to complete the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire, 36-item short form survey (SF-36), and neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. The 95 patients of them were requested to fulfill the Persian version of NOOS again, with 3 to 5 days interval. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. The construct validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, SF-36 subscales, and NDI, and pain was measured using visual analog scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain participated in validity studies and 95 patients agreed to participate in reliability studies. Floor/ceiling effects were not observed. Cronbach's α values of the subscale ranged between 0.60 and 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficient measures of the NOOS subscales ranging between 0.81 and 0.95. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscales and SF-36 subscales ranged between 0.11 and 0.72. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores and NDI questionnaire ranged between 0.33 and 0.61. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores, and pain (visual analog scale) ranged between 0.31 and 0.66.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study showed that the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire was a reliable and valid instrument to assess patients’ perception of their neck-related problems in Iranian patients with nonspecific neck pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The primary purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the neck outcome score (NOOS) questionnaire into Persian language and investigate its reliability and validity.

Methods

The NOOS questionnaire was translated into Persian language and culturally adapted according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain were requested to complete the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire, 36-item short form survey (SF-36), and neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. The 95 patients of them were requested to fulfill the Persian version of NOOS again, with 3 to 5 days interval. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. The construct validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, SF-36 subscales, and NDI, and pain was measured using visual analog scale.

Results

One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain participated in validity studies and 95 patients agreed to participate in reliability studies. Floor/ceiling effects were not observed. Cronbach's α values of the subscale ranged between 0.60 and 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficient measures of the NOOS subscales ranging between 0.81 and 0.95. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscales and SF-36 subscales ranged between 0.11 and 0.72. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores and NDI questionnaire ranged between 0.33 and 0.61. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores, and pain (visual analog scale) ranged between 0.31 and 0.66.

Conclusion

This study showed that the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire was a reliable and valid instrument to assess patients’ perception of their neck-related problems in Iranian patients with nonspecific neck pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗非特异性颈痛患者颈部结果评分问卷波斯语版的翻译、跨文化适应性、可靠性和有效性
本研究的主要目的是将颈部结果评分(NOOS)问卷翻译成波斯语并对其进行文化适应性调整,同时研究其可靠性和有效性。144 名非特异性颈部疼痛患者被要求完成波斯语版本的 NOOS 问卷、36 项简表调查(SF-36)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)问卷。其中 95 名患者被要求间隔 3 至 5 天再次填写波斯语版 NOOS 问卷。采用 Cronbach's α 和类内相关系数分别评估了内部一致性和重测可靠性。通过检验NOOS分量表、SF-36分量表和NDI之间的相关性假设来评估建构效度,并使用视觉模拟量表测量疼痛。未观察到地板/天花板效应。子量表的 Cronbach's α 值介于 0.60 和 0.89 之间。NOOS 分量表的类内相关系数介于 0.81 和 0.95 之间。NOOS 分量表与 SF-36 分量表之间的相关系数介于 0.11 和 0.72 之间。NOOS 分量表得分与 NDI 问卷之间的相关系数介于 0.33 与 0.61 之间。该研究表明,波斯语版 NOOS 问卷是一种可靠有效的工具,可用于评估伊朗非特异性颈部疼痛患者对其颈部相关问题的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Masthead Table of contents Evaluation of Abdominal Muscle Thickness Changes During Abdominal Hollowing Maneuver in Different Positions Using a Sphygmomanometer for People With Chronic Low Back Pain Evaluation of Trunk Muscle Strength and Endurance: A Comparison of Women With and Without Chronic Ankle Instability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1