A systematic literature review of impactful food waste interventions at the consumer level

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.11.023
Carole Liechti, Gabriele Mack, Jeanine Ammann
{"title":"A systematic literature review of impactful food waste interventions at the consumer level","authors":"Carole Liechti,&nbsp;Gabriele Mack,&nbsp;Jeanine Ammann","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As consumers contribute largely to the global food waste quantity, many efforts have been made to reduce food waste through interventions. However, knowledge of the impact of the interventions is required to reduce consumers' food waste. We systematically reviewed 49 studies that evaluated 54 interventions to reduce food waste at the consumer level. The studies were assessed according to three criteria: the type of intervention (single- or multi-component), the study design (randomised experiments, non-randomised [quasi] experiments, non-experimental studies), and the impact on food waste reduction (significant reduction, non-significant reduction, no reduction). The majority of interventions were single-component (<em>n</em> = 45), with only a small percentage being multi-component (<em>n</em> = 9). Most interventions resulted in a significant reduction in food waste (<em>n</em> = 36). Furthermore, the majority of the studies used non-randomised (quasi) experiments (<em>n</em> = 35). Multi-component interventions with nudges showed promise for reducing food waste among consumers, with most having a significant impact and leading to the highest food waste reductions (up to 84.3 %). This review synthesises the current state of knowledge regarding the impact of food waste reduction interventions, which can help identify and implement effective interventions in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages 552-565"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255092400335X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As consumers contribute largely to the global food waste quantity, many efforts have been made to reduce food waste through interventions. However, knowledge of the impact of the interventions is required to reduce consumers' food waste. We systematically reviewed 49 studies that evaluated 54 interventions to reduce food waste at the consumer level. The studies were assessed according to three criteria: the type of intervention (single- or multi-component), the study design (randomised experiments, non-randomised [quasi] experiments, non-experimental studies), and the impact on food waste reduction (significant reduction, non-significant reduction, no reduction). The majority of interventions were single-component (n = 45), with only a small percentage being multi-component (n = 9). Most interventions resulted in a significant reduction in food waste (n = 36). Furthermore, the majority of the studies used non-randomised (quasi) experiments (n = 35). Multi-component interventions with nudges showed promise for reducing food waste among consumers, with most having a significant impact and leading to the highest food waste reductions (up to 84.3 %). This review synthesises the current state of knowledge regarding the impact of food waste reduction interventions, which can help identify and implement effective interventions in the future.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于在消费者层面采取有影响力的食物浪费干预措施的系统性文献综述
由于消费者在很大程度上造成了全球的食物浪费量,人们已经做出了许多努力,通过干预措施来减少食物浪费。然而,要减少消费者的食物浪费,还需要了解干预措施的影响。我们系统回顾了 49 项研究,这些研究评估了 54 项在消费者层面减少食物浪费的干预措施。我们根据三个标准对这些研究进行了评估:干预措施的类型(单成分或多成分)、研究设计(随机实验、非随机[准]实验、非实验研究)以及对减少食物浪费的影响(显著减少、非显著减少、无减少)。大多数干预措施都是单一成分的(n = 45),只有一小部分是多成分的(n = 9)。大多数干预措施都能显著减少食物浪费(36 项)。此外,大多数研究都采用了非随机(准)实验(n = 35)。包含劝导的多成分干预措施显示出减少消费者食物浪费的前景,大多数干预措施效果显著,食物浪费减少率最高(达 84.3%)。本综述总结了当前有关减少食物浪费干预措施影响的知识,有助于今后确定和实施有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
Transforming the food system with a biomass value hierarchy: Sustainability and policy insights Effects of the long-term rice expansion on ecosystem carbon budget in the typical agricultural area of Northeast China A life cycle assessment model to evaluate the environmental sustainability of lignin-based polyols A systematic literature review of impactful food waste interventions at the consumer level Sustainability-driven regime shifts in Complex Adaptive Systems: The case of animal production and food system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1