Subjectivity in creative self beliefs: A Q-sort analysis

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112974
Jeb S. Puryear , Kristen N. Lamb
{"title":"Subjectivity in creative self beliefs: A Q-sort analysis","authors":"Jeb S. Puryear ,&nbsp;Kristen N. Lamb","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past two decades, the study of creative self-beliefs has focused on generating instruments which target self-efficacy, self-identity, and self-perceptions. In this study, we re-examined creative self-belief (CSB) scales through the lens of implicit and subjective beliefs about creativity using Q-methodology. Our goal was to determine whether patterns in people's subjective beliefs about creativity manifested themselves in the assessment of CSBs. To accomplish this goal, we used forty-nine items from previously published scales on CSBs to create the corpus of items for a Q-sort analysis. Findings revealed three perspectives on how people arrive at whether they think they are creative or not: <em>Identity-Essentialist</em>, <em>Practical-Productive</em>, and <em>Imaginative-Visionary</em>. Connections were observed between the three perspectives, scales from which items were drawn, and typical implicit theories of creativity. Qualitative analysis of pre- and post-sort questions extended on the implicit theories theme as participants suggested that the existing CSB items did not fully capture their thought process when considering whether they are creative or not. Implications for the assessment of CSBs and the relevance of implicit theories in that work are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 112974"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the study of creative self-beliefs has focused on generating instruments which target self-efficacy, self-identity, and self-perceptions. In this study, we re-examined creative self-belief (CSB) scales through the lens of implicit and subjective beliefs about creativity using Q-methodology. Our goal was to determine whether patterns in people's subjective beliefs about creativity manifested themselves in the assessment of CSBs. To accomplish this goal, we used forty-nine items from previously published scales on CSBs to create the corpus of items for a Q-sort analysis. Findings revealed three perspectives on how people arrive at whether they think they are creative or not: Identity-Essentialist, Practical-Productive, and Imaginative-Visionary. Connections were observed between the three perspectives, scales from which items were drawn, and typical implicit theories of creativity. Qualitative analysis of pre- and post-sort questions extended on the implicit theories theme as participants suggested that the existing CSB items did not fully capture their thought process when considering whether they are creative or not. Implications for the assessment of CSBs and the relevance of implicit theories in that work are also discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创造性自我信念的主观性:Q 排序分析
在过去的二十年里,对创造性自我信念的研究主要集中在针对自我效能、自我认同和自我认知的工具的开发上。在本研究中,我们使用 Q 方法从内隐和主观创造力信念的角度重新审视了创造力自我信念(CSB)量表。我们的目标是确定人们对创造力的主观信念模式是否会在 CSB 评估中体现出来。为了实现这一目标,我们使用了以前发布的 CSB 量表中的 49 个项目来创建 Q 分类分析的项目库。研究结果揭示了人们如何得出自己是否具有创造力的三种观点:身份-本质主义、实践-生产和想象-远见。我们还观察到了这三种观点、量表中的项目以及典型的内隐创造力理论之间的联系。对分类前和分类后问题的定性分析扩展了内隐理论的主题,因为参与者认为现有的 CSB 项目并不能完全反映他们在考虑自己是否具有创造力时的思维过程。此外,还讨论了 CSB 评估的意义以及内隐理论在这项工作中的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Personality traits and their role in intimate partner violence recidivism: A 15-year follow-up study within a prison sample Navigating the pitfalls of incivility: The role of resilience in job search behavior Subjectivity in creative self beliefs: A Q-sort analysis Developing a novel parental phubbing scale of mother and father forms for adolescents in Türkiye: A validity and reliability study Clusters of borderline personality disorder traits and functional life outcomes: A novel person-centered approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1