Optimizing the Use of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Timely Detection of and Response to COVID-19 in Schools and Markets in Uganda.
Jerry Mulondo, Susan Nayiga, Winnie Nuwagaba, Patience Nayebare, Jane Frances Namuganga, Isaac Ssewanyana, Moses R Kamya, Joaniter I Nankabirwa
{"title":"Optimizing the Use of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Timely Detection of and Response to COVID-19 in Schools and Markets in Uganda.","authors":"Jerry Mulondo, Susan Nayiga, Winnie Nuwagaba, Patience Nayebare, Jane Frances Namuganga, Isaac Ssewanyana, Moses R Kamya, Joaniter I Nankabirwa","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.23-0758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The early detection and management of infections is crucial to control epidemics. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for the timely detection of and response to coronavirus disease 2019 in high-risk border communities in Uganda. Between May and September 2022, monthly cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 11 schools and two markets in two border districts. Only baseline and end-line testing were also performed in matched control communities. Antigen rapid diagnostic test results and demographic and clinical data were collected, and contacts of patients were traced and tested. All patients were advised to self-isolate, and compliance was assessed on day 5. We enrolled 10,406 participants out of 10,472 screened individuals. The participants had a 1.3% test positivity rate, with schools recording higher, but non-significant, positivity rates than markets (1.4% versus 0.9%; P = 0.149). We tracked 556 contacts, and 536 (96.4%) agreed to test. The test positivity rate was significantly higher among contacts than the index participants (8.8% versus 1.3%; P <0.001). Only 55 (29.7%) of the index participants self-isolated effectively. Settings that received monthly testing had lower end-line positivity rates than controls (0.3% versus 1.4%; P = 0.001). Repeated SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT testing is feasible and could reduce SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, the participation in testing may have been enhanced by the compensation provided. Also, isolation was limited, which may reduce the impact of the intervention when rolled out on a large scale. Innovative strategies to increase the isolation of patients could improve the utility of early testing for transmission reduction during epidemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.23-0758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The early detection and management of infections is crucial to control epidemics. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for the timely detection of and response to coronavirus disease 2019 in high-risk border communities in Uganda. Between May and September 2022, monthly cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 11 schools and two markets in two border districts. Only baseline and end-line testing were also performed in matched control communities. Antigen rapid diagnostic test results and demographic and clinical data were collected, and contacts of patients were traced and tested. All patients were advised to self-isolate, and compliance was assessed on day 5. We enrolled 10,406 participants out of 10,472 screened individuals. The participants had a 1.3% test positivity rate, with schools recording higher, but non-significant, positivity rates than markets (1.4% versus 0.9%; P = 0.149). We tracked 556 contacts, and 536 (96.4%) agreed to test. The test positivity rate was significantly higher among contacts than the index participants (8.8% versus 1.3%; P <0.001). Only 55 (29.7%) of the index participants self-isolated effectively. Settings that received monthly testing had lower end-line positivity rates than controls (0.3% versus 1.4%; P = 0.001). Repeated SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT testing is feasible and could reduce SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, the participation in testing may have been enhanced by the compensation provided. Also, isolation was limited, which may reduce the impact of the intervention when rolled out on a large scale. Innovative strategies to increase the isolation of patients could improve the utility of early testing for transmission reduction during epidemics.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine.
The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development.
The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal.
Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries