Natural Semantic Networks: The Concept of Mistreatment and Good Treatment in Students of Health Careers.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.3390/bs14111072
Javiera Ortega-Bastidas, Marjorie Baquedano-Rodríguez, Nancy Bastías-Vega, Cristhian Pérez-Villalobos, Mary Jane Schilling-Norman, Paula Parra-Ponce, Ricardo Arteaga-San Martín, Marcela Hechenleitner-Carvallo, María Isabel Ríos-Teillier, Ximena Paredes-Villarroel, José Peralta-Camposano, Alejandra Ricouz-Moya, Catherine Soto-Faúndes, Carolina Williams-Oyarce
{"title":"Natural Semantic Networks: The Concept of Mistreatment and Good Treatment in Students of Health Careers.","authors":"Javiera Ortega-Bastidas, Marjorie Baquedano-Rodríguez, Nancy Bastías-Vega, Cristhian Pérez-Villalobos, Mary Jane Schilling-Norman, Paula Parra-Ponce, Ricardo Arteaga-San Martín, Marcela Hechenleitner-Carvallo, María Isabel Ríos-Teillier, Ximena Paredes-Villarroel, José Peralta-Camposano, Alejandra Ricouz-Moya, Catherine Soto-Faúndes, Carolina Williams-Oyarce","doi":"10.3390/bs14111072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Natural semantic networks (NSNs) provide an approach to understanding concepts in terms of their density and strength. The objective of this study was to conceptualize mistreatment and good treatment among health science students in Chile, according to gender and training cycle. <b>Methods</b>: A mixed-methods study with a relational scope was conducted, involving 994 health science students. The present study is exploratory and combines both qualitative and quantitative analysis. We utilized the NSN technique, applying a questionnaire via SurveyMonkey after obtaining informed consent. <b>Results</b>: A total of 4386 defining words for mistreatment were identified, with the most relevant being 'aggression', 'abuse', and 'violence'. In the case of good treatment, a total of 4146 defining words were obtained, with 'respect', 'empathy', and 'kindness' standing out. For good treatment, a statistically significant relationship was observed between the defining words and the variables of gender (χ<sup>2</sup> = 41.158; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and training cycle (χ<sup>2</sup> = 28.698; <i>p</i> < 0.05). For mistreatment, a statistically significant relationship was found only with training cycle (χ<sup>2</sup> = 35.858; <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: Exploring the meanings associated with mistreatment and good treatment has a theoretical implication in the way in which two highly polysemic aspects of the educational environment can be understood.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural semantic networks (NSNs) provide an approach to understanding concepts in terms of their density and strength. The objective of this study was to conceptualize mistreatment and good treatment among health science students in Chile, according to gender and training cycle. Methods: A mixed-methods study with a relational scope was conducted, involving 994 health science students. The present study is exploratory and combines both qualitative and quantitative analysis. We utilized the NSN technique, applying a questionnaire via SurveyMonkey after obtaining informed consent. Results: A total of 4386 defining words for mistreatment were identified, with the most relevant being 'aggression', 'abuse', and 'violence'. In the case of good treatment, a total of 4146 defining words were obtained, with 'respect', 'empathy', and 'kindness' standing out. For good treatment, a statistically significant relationship was observed between the defining words and the variables of gender (χ2 = 41.158; p < 0.05) and training cycle (χ2 = 28.698; p < 0.05). For mistreatment, a statistically significant relationship was found only with training cycle (χ2 = 35.858; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Exploring the meanings associated with mistreatment and good treatment has a theoretical implication in the way in which two highly polysemic aspects of the educational environment can be understood.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然语义网络:医疗卫生专业学生中的 "虐待 "和 "善待 "概念。
自然语义网络(NSN)提供了一种根据概念的密度和强度来理解概念的方法。本研究旨在根据性别和培训周期,对智利健康科学专业学生中的虐待和善待进行概念化。研究方法进行了一项关系范围的混合方法研究,涉及 994 名健康科学专业学生。本研究为探索性研究,结合了定性和定量分析。我们采用了 NSN 技术,在获得知情同意后通过 SurveyMonkey 进行了问卷调查。研究结果共识别出 4386 个虐待定义词,其中最相关的是 "侵犯"、"虐待 "和 "暴力"。在善待方面,共获得了 4146 个定义词,其中 "尊重"、"同情 "和 "仁慈 "最为突出。在善待方面,定义词与性别(χ2 = 41.158; p < 0.05)和培训周期(χ2 = 28.698; p < 0.05)这两个变量之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系。在虐待方面,只有训练周期(χ2 = 35.858; p < 0.05)与虐待有显著统计学关系。结论探讨与虐待和良好待遇相关的含义,对于如何理解教育环境中两个高度多义性的方面具有理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Associations Among Beliefs Supporting Patriarchal Principles, Conflict Avoidance, and Economic Violence in Intimate-Partner Relationships of Ultra-Orthodox Jews. Can the Ability to Play Steady Beats Be Indicative of Cognitive Aging? Using a Beat Processing Device. Narcissistic Chief Executive Officers and Their Effects on R&D Investment and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion. Patient Safety Incidents in Inpatient Psychiatric Settings: An Expert Opinion Survey. Adolescent Depressive Symptoms and Peer Dynamics: Distorted Perceptions in Liking and Disliking Networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1