Dong Li, Rong Zhou, Chunjian Song, Jianhua Lu, Jun Lu
{"title":"Application of 3D printing technology in preoperative planning and treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective study.","authors":"Dong Li, Rong Zhou, Chunjian Song, Jianhua Lu, Jun Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08060-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of 3D printing technology in preoperative planning and treatment of these fractures has shown promise in improving surgical efficiency, trauma, and patient outcomes. This study aims to demonstrate the advantages of applying 3D printing technology to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures by comparing cases selected for 3D printing with a control group (conventional surgery group), in order to further promote the application of 3D technology in a broader range of trauma treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted the clinical data of 51 patients with proximal humeral fractures. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients diagnosed with Neer II and III type proximal humerus fractures. Among them, 24 patients underwent traditional surgery, while 27 patients underwent surgery with 3D printing technology support. Intraoperative parameters, functional outcomes, radiographic results at 6 months, and pain scores were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D printing group demonstrated significantly reduced total surgery time compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). Implant placement accuracy was significantly higher in the 3D printing group compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). Functional outcomes at 6 months favored the 3D printing group, with higher Constant-Murley Score and lower Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Score compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the 3D printing group showed a significantly lower prevalence of heterotopic ossification compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). Preoperative and early postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the 3D printing group compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of 3D printing technology into the preoperative planning and treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures demonstrated significant advantages in surgical efficiency, functional outcomes, radiographic prognosis, and pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08060-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The application of 3D printing technology in preoperative planning and treatment of these fractures has shown promise in improving surgical efficiency, trauma, and patient outcomes. This study aims to demonstrate the advantages of applying 3D printing technology to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures by comparing cases selected for 3D printing with a control group (conventional surgery group), in order to further promote the application of 3D technology in a broader range of trauma treatments.
Methods: This study conducted the clinical data of 51 patients with proximal humeral fractures. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients diagnosed with Neer II and III type proximal humerus fractures. Among them, 24 patients underwent traditional surgery, while 27 patients underwent surgery with 3D printing technology support. Intraoperative parameters, functional outcomes, radiographic results at 6 months, and pain scores were collected and analyzed.
Results: The 3D printing group demonstrated significantly reduced total surgery time compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). Implant placement accuracy was significantly higher in the 3D printing group compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). Functional outcomes at 6 months favored the 3D printing group, with higher Constant-Murley Score and lower Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Score compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the 3D printing group showed a significantly lower prevalence of heterotopic ossification compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). Preoperative and early postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the 3D printing group compared to the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The integration of 3D printing technology into the preoperative planning and treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures demonstrated significant advantages in surgical efficiency, functional outcomes, radiographic prognosis, and pain management.
背景:在肱骨近端骨折的术前规划和治疗中应用三维打印技术,在提高手术效率、改善创伤和患者预后方面大有可为。本研究旨在通过将选择 3D 打印的病例与对照组(传统手术组)进行比较,证明将 3D 打印技术应用于肱骨近端骨折治疗的优势,从而进一步推动 3D 技术在更广泛的创伤治疗中的应用:本研究收集了 51 例肱骨近端骨折患者的临床数据。纳入标准包括确诊为 Neer II 型和 III 型肱骨近端骨折的患者。其中,24名患者接受了传统手术,27名患者接受了3D打印技术支持下的手术。收集并分析了术中参数、功能结果、6个月的影像学结果以及疼痛评分:结果:与传统手术组相比,3D 打印组的手术总时间明显缩短(P将 3D 打印技术整合到复杂肱骨近端骨折的术前规划和治疗中,在手术效率、功能结果、影像学预后和疼痛管理方面都有显著优势。
期刊介绍:
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.