{"title":"Some Improvements on Good Lattice Point Sets.","authors":"Yu-Xuan Lin, Tian-Yu Yan, Kai-Tai Fang","doi":"10.3390/e26110910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Good lattice point (GLP) sets are a type of number-theoretic method widely utilized across various fields. Their space-filling property can be further improved, especially with large numbers of runs and factors. In this paper, Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is used to measure GLP sets. The generalized good lattice point (GGLP) sets obtained from linear-level permutations of GLP sets have demonstrated that the permutation does not reduce the criterion maximin distance. This paper confirms that linear-level permutation may lead to greater mixture discrepancy. Nevertheless, GGLP sets can still enhance the space-filling property of GLP sets under various criteria. For small-sized cases, the KL divergence from the uniform distribution of GGLP sets is lower than that of the initial GLP sets, and there is nearly no difference for large-sized points, indicating the similarity of their distributions. This paper incorporates a threshold-accepting algorithm in the construction of GGLP sets and adopts Frobenius distance as the space-filling criterion for large-sized cases. The initial GLP sets have been included in many monographs and are widely utilized. The corresponding GGLP sets are partially included in this paper and will be further calculated and posted online in the future. The performance of GGLP sets is evaluated in two applications: computer experiments and representative points, compared to the initial GLP sets. It shows that GGLP sets perform better in many cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"26 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e26110910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Good lattice point (GLP) sets are a type of number-theoretic method widely utilized across various fields. Their space-filling property can be further improved, especially with large numbers of runs and factors. In this paper, Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is used to measure GLP sets. The generalized good lattice point (GGLP) sets obtained from linear-level permutations of GLP sets have demonstrated that the permutation does not reduce the criterion maximin distance. This paper confirms that linear-level permutation may lead to greater mixture discrepancy. Nevertheless, GGLP sets can still enhance the space-filling property of GLP sets under various criteria. For small-sized cases, the KL divergence from the uniform distribution of GGLP sets is lower than that of the initial GLP sets, and there is nearly no difference for large-sized points, indicating the similarity of their distributions. This paper incorporates a threshold-accepting algorithm in the construction of GGLP sets and adopts Frobenius distance as the space-filling criterion for large-sized cases. The initial GLP sets have been included in many monographs and are widely utilized. The corresponding GGLP sets are partially included in this paper and will be further calculated and posted online in the future. The performance of GGLP sets is evaluated in two applications: computer experiments and representative points, compared to the initial GLP sets. It shows that GGLP sets perform better in many cases.
期刊介绍:
Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.