Aortic Dimension in Elite Athletes: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae385
Andreina Carbone, Emanuele Monda, Francesco Ferrara, Monica Franzese, Roberta Bottino, Valentina Russo, Chiara Cirillo, Salvatore Rega, Antonio Cittadini, Antonio Pelliccia, Giuseppe Limongelli, Eduardo Bossone
{"title":"Aortic Dimension in Elite Athletes: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Andreina Carbone, Emanuele Monda, Francesco Ferrara, Monica Franzese, Roberta Bottino, Valentina Russo, Chiara Cirillo, Salvatore Rega, Antonio Cittadini, Antonio Pelliccia, Giuseppe Limongelli, Eduardo Bossone","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the presence and the extent of an \"aortic remodeling\" in elite athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature were conducted for studies (1981-2024) reporting echocardiographic aortic diameters of elite athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls. Among the 5,494 studies retrieved, 21 (9,464 elite athletes vs. 2,637 non-athlete controls) fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Data were aggregated using a random effects model for estimating the pooled risk ratio and mean difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute aortic diameters at the sinus of Valsalva (AoSV) were higher in overall elite athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls (mean difference [MD] 1.69 [95% CI 1.01-2.37] mm; p <0.001) and if stratified to sex. This difference was maintained if AoSV was indexed to height (AoSV/h) (MD 0.04 [95% CI -0.00-0.08] mm/m; ES 2.18 [95% CI 1.10-3.26]; p<0.001). The analysis of AoSV/h according to sex was not performed for the paucity of studies. However, when indexed to body surface area (AoSV/BSA), no differences were found between the two groups (MD 0.04 [95% CI -0.25-0.34] mm/m2; p = 0.880), also according to sex. Above findings were not influenced by age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absolute AoSV was mildly larger in athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls, even when indexed to height. However, no differences were evident when indexed by BSA, irrespective of sex, type of sport and age. Therefore, assessment of the aortic size in elite athletes should consider the proper normalization in order to avoid misdiagnosis of aortopathies.</p><p><strong>Prospero registry id: </strong>CRD42024561255.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To assess the presence and the extent of an "aortic remodeling" in elite athletes.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature were conducted for studies (1981-2024) reporting echocardiographic aortic diameters of elite athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls. Among the 5,494 studies retrieved, 21 (9,464 elite athletes vs. 2,637 non-athlete controls) fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Data were aggregated using a random effects model for estimating the pooled risk ratio and mean difference.

Results: Absolute aortic diameters at the sinus of Valsalva (AoSV) were higher in overall elite athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls (mean difference [MD] 1.69 [95% CI 1.01-2.37] mm; p <0.001) and if stratified to sex. This difference was maintained if AoSV was indexed to height (AoSV/h) (MD 0.04 [95% CI -0.00-0.08] mm/m; ES 2.18 [95% CI 1.10-3.26]; p<0.001). The analysis of AoSV/h according to sex was not performed for the paucity of studies. However, when indexed to body surface area (AoSV/BSA), no differences were found between the two groups (MD 0.04 [95% CI -0.25-0.34] mm/m2; p = 0.880), also according to sex. Above findings were not influenced by age.

Conclusions: Absolute AoSV was mildly larger in athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls, even when indexed to height. However, no differences were evident when indexed by BSA, irrespective of sex, type of sport and age. Therefore, assessment of the aortic size in elite athletes should consider the proper normalization in order to avoid misdiagnosis of aortopathies.

Prospero registry id: CRD42024561255.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精英运动员的主动脉尺寸:更新的系统回顾和元分析。
目的:评估精英运动员是否存在 "主动脉重塑 "及其程度:对报道精英运动员与非运动员健康对照组主动脉直径超声心动图对比的研究(1981-2024 年)进行了系统回顾和文献荟萃分析。在检索到的5494项研究中,有21项(9464名精英运动员与2637名非运动员对照组)符合所有资格标准。采用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总,以估算汇总风险比和平均差异:结果:与非运动员健康对照组相比,精英运动员在瓦尔萨尔瓦窦处的主动脉绝对直径(AoSV)更高(平均差[MD] 1.69 [95% CI 1.01-2.37] mm; p 结论:精英运动员在瓦尔萨尔瓦窦处的主动脉绝对直径略高于非运动员健康对照组(平均差[MD] 1.69 [95% CI 1.01-2.37] mm; p):与非运动员健康对照组相比,即使以身高为指数,运动员的绝对AoSV也略大于非运动员健康对照组。然而,无论性别、运动类型和年龄如何,以 BSA 为指标时均无明显差异。因此,在评估精英运动员的主动脉尺寸时应考虑适当的正常化,以避免误诊主动脉疾病:CRD42024561255。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Sex differences in myocardial infarction care and outcomes: a longitudinal Scottish National Data-Linkage Study. Association of Modifiable Lifestyle Risk Factors with High-Sensitivity Troponin T and I Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes. Aortic Dimension in Elite Athletes: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Association between folate deficiency and hypertension: evidence from an observational and Mendelian randomization study. Temporal trend and attributable risk factors of cardiovascular diseases burden for adults 55 years and older in 204 countries/territories from 1990 to 2021: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1