Factors associated with loneliness in Latin-American family care partners during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1286141
Tomas Leon, Thamara Tapia-Munoz, Andrea Slachevsky, Bárbara Costa Beber, Fernando Aguzzoli, Carla Nubia, Mireya Vilar-Compte, Pablo Gaitan-Rossi, Loreto Olavarria, Loreto Castro, Alejandra Pinto, Tania Guajardo, R Emilia Grycuk, Yaohua Chen, Iracema Leroi, Brian Lawlor, Claudia Duran-Aniotz, Roger O' Sullivan, Claudia Miranda-Castillo
{"title":"Factors associated with loneliness in Latin-American family care partners during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Tomas Leon, Thamara Tapia-Munoz, Andrea Slachevsky, Bárbara Costa Beber, Fernando Aguzzoli, Carla Nubia, Mireya Vilar-Compte, Pablo Gaitan-Rossi, Loreto Olavarria, Loreto Castro, Alejandra Pinto, Tania Guajardo, R Emilia Grycuk, Yaohua Chen, Iracema Leroi, Brian Lawlor, Claudia Duran-Aniotz, Roger O' Sullivan, Claudia Miranda-Castillo","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1286141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19-related restrictions led to an increase in overall loneliness and social isolation. Before the pandemic, care partners reported higher levels of loneliness and higher loneliness prevalence compared to non-care partners. Because of the spread and severity of the infections, and the access to support spread, we expect a different impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on LATAM care partners.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the loneliness levels of LATAM caregivers and to identify socioeconomic and health factors associated.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An international online cross-sectional survey for care partners, embedded within the 'Coping with Loneliness and Isolation during COVID-19' (CLIC) Study conducted between June 2020- and November 2020.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We analysed data from 246 family care partners living in Latin American countries (46% Mexico, 26% Chile,18% Brazil, and 10% from Argentina, Peru, Venezuela, Panama, Guatemala y Costa Rica).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We assessed loneliness using the 6-items of De Jong Gierveld loneliness Scale. We described the levels of overall, emotional, and social loneliness pre and during Covid, and reported the distribution of care partners who improved, worsened or maintained their levels of loneliness. Moreover, we used longitudinal multiple linear regression models with bootstraps errors of 1,000 iterations to identify factors associated with the levels of overall, emotional, and social loneliness during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were mostly women, 50 years and older, in a partnership, highly educated and with finances meeting their needs, with good to excellent physical and mental health. Among the total of care partners, 55% perceived higher overall loneliness, 56% higher emotional loneliness, and 21% higher social loneliness during the pandemic in comparison with pre-COVID-19 levels. Perceived mental health was associated with the overall, emotional, and social loneliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regardless of their living and health situation, during the pandemic, loneliness increased in all groups of care partners. These should be taken in consideration when planning public health approaches for crises such as pandemics or other large-scale disruptive events.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"15 ","pages":"1286141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1286141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19-related restrictions led to an increase in overall loneliness and social isolation. Before the pandemic, care partners reported higher levels of loneliness and higher loneliness prevalence compared to non-care partners. Because of the spread and severity of the infections, and the access to support spread, we expect a different impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on LATAM care partners.

Objectives: To describe the loneliness levels of LATAM caregivers and to identify socioeconomic and health factors associated.

Design: An international online cross-sectional survey for care partners, embedded within the 'Coping with Loneliness and Isolation during COVID-19' (CLIC) Study conducted between June 2020- and November 2020.

Setting: We analysed data from 246 family care partners living in Latin American countries (46% Mexico, 26% Chile,18% Brazil, and 10% from Argentina, Peru, Venezuela, Panama, Guatemala y Costa Rica).

Measurements: We assessed loneliness using the 6-items of De Jong Gierveld loneliness Scale. We described the levels of overall, emotional, and social loneliness pre and during Covid, and reported the distribution of care partners who improved, worsened or maintained their levels of loneliness. Moreover, we used longitudinal multiple linear regression models with bootstraps errors of 1,000 iterations to identify factors associated with the levels of overall, emotional, and social loneliness during the pandemic.

Results: Participants were mostly women, 50 years and older, in a partnership, highly educated and with finances meeting their needs, with good to excellent physical and mental health. Among the total of care partners, 55% perceived higher overall loneliness, 56% higher emotional loneliness, and 21% higher social loneliness during the pandemic in comparison with pre-COVID-19 levels. Perceived mental health was associated with the overall, emotional, and social loneliness.

Conclusions: Regardless of their living and health situation, during the pandemic, loneliness increased in all groups of care partners. These should be taken in consideration when planning public health approaches for crises such as pandemics or other large-scale disruptive events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,与拉丁美洲家庭护理伙伴孤独感相关的因素。
背景:与 COVID-19 相关的限制导致整体孤独感和社会隔离感增加。在大流行之前,与非护理伙伴相比,护理伙伴报告的孤独程度更高,孤独发生率也更高。由于感染的传播和严重程度以及获得支持的途径不同,我们预计 COVID-19 大流行会对拉丁美洲和加勒比海地区的护理伙伴产生不同的影响:描述拉美和加勒比海地区护理人员的孤独程度,并确定相关的社会经济和健康因素:设计:2020 年 6 月至 2020 年 11 月期间进行的 "COVID-19 期间孤独与隔离应对"(CLIC)研究中的一项针对护理伙伴的国际在线横断面调查:我们分析了居住在拉丁美洲国家的 246 个家庭护理伙伴的数据(46% 来自墨西哥,26% 来自智利,18% 来自巴西,10% 来自阿根廷、秘鲁、委内瑞拉、巴拿马、危地马拉和哥斯达黎加):我们使用 De Jong Gierveld 孤独量表的 6 个项目来评估孤独感。我们描述了 Covid 前和 Covid 期间的整体、情感和社交孤独程度,并报告了孤独程度有所改善、恶化或维持的护理伙伴的分布情况。此外,我们还使用了纵向多元线性回归模型,以1000次迭代的引导误差来确定大流行期间与总体孤独感、情感孤独感和社交孤独感水平相关的因素:参与者大多为女性,年龄在 50 岁及以上,有伴侣,受过高等教育,经济状况良好,身心健康。在所有的护理伙伴中,55%的人认为在大流行期间的总体孤独感高于COVID-19之前的水平,56%的人认为情感孤独感高于COVID-19之前的水平,21%的人认为社会孤独感高于COVID-19之前的水平。心理健康感知与总体孤独感、情感孤独感和社交孤独感相关:无论其生活和健康状况如何,在大流行期间,所有护理伙伴群体的孤独感都有所增加。在为大流行病或其他大规模破坏性事件等危机规划公共卫生方法时,应考虑到这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Women in psychiatry 2023: psychopharmacology. Factors associated with loneliness in Latin-American family care partners during the COVID-19 pandemic. Metformin in the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain - why the 'weight'? Augmenting self-guided virtual-reality exposure therapy for social anxiety with biofeedback: a randomised controlled trial. Corrigendum: The predictive validity of a Brain Care Score for late-life depression and a composite outcome of dementia, stroke, and late-life depression: data from the UK Biobank cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1