Group text messaging as a residency teaching tool in outpatient neurology and headache: A mixed-methods observational study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Headache Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/head.14870
Anjeli Song, Joseph E Safdieh, Matthew S Robbins
{"title":"Group text messaging as a residency teaching tool in outpatient neurology and headache: A mixed-methods observational study.","authors":"Anjeli Song, Joseph E Safdieh, Matthew S Robbins","doi":"10.1111/head.14870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility and efficacy of group text messaging as a teaching tool to improve neurology resident knowledge and clinical pearl dissemination in an outpatient setting enriched with headache encounters, and to evaluate if learning points from this teaching method would influence resident care of subsequent patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Inpatient neurology teaching during training is most often accomplished in team settings during rounds or conferences such as morning report, but outpatient teaching where headache is more likely encountered may be less consistently performed in such a setting where learning points may be shared. Few studies have evaluated whether group text messaging can be an innovative tool for teaching in residency training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neurology residents in a continuity clinic pod at New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell were included in this cohort from December 2020 through March 2024. Group text messages deidentified of any patient information were sent to the resident pod by their preceptor after each clinic session featuring one text message regarding a takeaway learning point pertaining to each patient encounter. Residents were surveyed on their satisfaction with this teaching method and whether these text messages improved their outpatient neurology knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 230 text messages were sent to a cohort of 21 residents across 4 academic years. Text message topics covered a variety of neurological subspecialties, most commonly headache and facial pain (44.8%), general neurology (15.7%), and neuromuscular (14.3%). In our survey, 93% of resident respondents reported that receiving clinical pearls improved their outpatient neurology knowledge and changed how they cared for subsequent patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reinforcement of traditionally one-on-one learning points in a teaching outpatient setting to engage a group of residents was feasible across visit types. There was an overall very positive response to this teaching method, and residents reported improved knowledge, which influenced their care of subsequent patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14870","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of group text messaging as a teaching tool to improve neurology resident knowledge and clinical pearl dissemination in an outpatient setting enriched with headache encounters, and to evaluate if learning points from this teaching method would influence resident care of subsequent patients.

Background: Inpatient neurology teaching during training is most often accomplished in team settings during rounds or conferences such as morning report, but outpatient teaching where headache is more likely encountered may be less consistently performed in such a setting where learning points may be shared. Few studies have evaluated whether group text messaging can be an innovative tool for teaching in residency training.

Methods: Neurology residents in a continuity clinic pod at New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell were included in this cohort from December 2020 through March 2024. Group text messages deidentified of any patient information were sent to the resident pod by their preceptor after each clinic session featuring one text message regarding a takeaway learning point pertaining to each patient encounter. Residents were surveyed on their satisfaction with this teaching method and whether these text messages improved their outpatient neurology knowledge.

Results: A total of 230 text messages were sent to a cohort of 21 residents across 4 academic years. Text message topics covered a variety of neurological subspecialties, most commonly headache and facial pain (44.8%), general neurology (15.7%), and neuromuscular (14.3%). In our survey, 93% of resident respondents reported that receiving clinical pearls improved their outpatient neurology knowledge and changed how they cared for subsequent patients.

Conclusion: Reinforcement of traditionally one-on-one learning points in a teaching outpatient setting to engage a group of residents was feasible across visit types. There was an overall very positive response to this teaching method, and residents reported improved knowledge, which influenced their care of subsequent patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将群发短信作为神经病学和头痛门诊的住院医师教学工具:混合方法观察研究。
目的目的:评估以群发短信作为教学工具的可行性和有效性,以提高神经内科住院医师在门诊环境中遇到头痛患者时的知识和临床珍珠传播,并评估这种教学方法的学习要点是否会影响住院医师对后续患者的护理:背景:培训期间的神经病学住院教学通常是在查房或晨间报告等会议期间的团队环境中完成的,但在门诊教学中更有可能遇到头痛问题,而在这样的环境中分享学习要点可能不太一致。很少有研究对群发短信是否能成为住院医师培训中的创新教学工具进行评估:方法:2020 年 12 月至 2024 年 3 月期间,纽约长老会-威尔康奈尔医院连续性诊所的神经科住院医师被纳入本队列。每次门诊结束后,住院医师的戒酒师都会向住院医师群组发送一条短信,内容是与每次患者就诊相关的学习要点,短信中已删除了任何患者信息。住院医师对这种教学方法的满意度以及这些短信是否提高了他们的神经病学门诊知识进行了调查:在 4 个学年中,共向 21 名住院医师发送了 230 条短信。短信主题涵盖了各种神经病学亚专科,最常见的是头痛和面部疼痛(44.8%)、普通神经病学(15.7%)和神经肌肉学(14.3%)。在我们的调查中,93% 的住院医师受访者表示,接受临床珍珠课程提高了他们的神经病学门诊知识,并改变了他们对后续患者的护理方式:结论:在不同的就诊类型中,在门诊教学环境中强化传统的一对一学习点以吸引住院医师群体是可行的。住院医师对这种教学方法的总体反应非常积极,他们表示自己的知识水平得到了提高,这影响了他们对后续患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
期刊最新文献
Validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the Arabic version of the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire after prophylactic treatment. A post hoc analysis of migraine-associated symptoms from the phase 3 randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled Trial of External trigeminal nerve stimulation for the Acute treatment of Migraine (TEAM) study. Deep brain stimulation for chronic refractory cluster headache: A case series about long-term outcomes and connectivity analysis. Facial variant of epicrania fugax secondary to a cerebellopontine angle meningioma. Group text messaging as a residency teaching tool in outpatient neurology and headache: A mixed-methods observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1