Impairments of attention in RRMS patients: the role of disease duration.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1080/13803395.2024.2427421
Devrim Kalkan, Murat Kurt
{"title":"Impairments of attention in RRMS patients: the role of disease duration.","authors":"Devrim Kalkan, Murat Kurt","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2024.2427421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The extent to which different types of attention are affected in RRMS based on disease duration has not been extensively analyzed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether MS patients differ compared to healthy individuals in a homogeneous sample of RRMS patients in terms of attention types and from which year of MS attention deficit starts. Another aim of the study was to examine the effect of MS duration and stimulus onset asynchrony on dual task performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of RRMS patients (<i>n</i> = 53) and healthy participants (<i>n</i> = 30) between the ages of 20-49, who were at least primary school graduates. Healthy participants in the comparison group were reached by snowball sampling technique. Stroop Test, Cancellation Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Coding Test, WMS-R Digit Span and Visual Memory Span subtests were administered to assess attention. Divided attention performance was assessed with a dual task developed based on psychological refractory period paradigm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that there is a significant difference between RRMS patients and healthy participants in terms of different types of attention (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Focused, sustained and divided attention of RRMS patients and the ability to resist interference showed a significant decline from the 7th year of the disease (<i>p</i> < 0.05); no significant difference was found between healthy participants and patients with 1-6 years of RRMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the results of the study are consistent with the literature which show that attention deficit develops in MS, it is important in terms of showing that attention deficit changes depending on the duration of the disease. Focused attention, sustained attention, interference resistance and divided attention performance of RRMS patients showed a significant decline after the 7th year of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"891-912"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2427421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The extent to which different types of attention are affected in RRMS based on disease duration has not been extensively analyzed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether MS patients differ compared to healthy individuals in a homogeneous sample of RRMS patients in terms of attention types and from which year of MS attention deficit starts. Another aim of the study was to examine the effect of MS duration and stimulus onset asynchrony on dual task performance.

Methods: The sample consisted of RRMS patients (n = 53) and healthy participants (n = 30) between the ages of 20-49, who were at least primary school graduates. Healthy participants in the comparison group were reached by snowball sampling technique. Stroop Test, Cancellation Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Coding Test, WMS-R Digit Span and Visual Memory Span subtests were administered to assess attention. Divided attention performance was assessed with a dual task developed based on psychological refractory period paradigm.

Results: The results show that there is a significant difference between RRMS patients and healthy participants in terms of different types of attention (p < 0.05). Focused, sustained and divided attention of RRMS patients and the ability to resist interference showed a significant decline from the 7th year of the disease (p < 0.05); no significant difference was found between healthy participants and patients with 1-6 years of RRMS.

Conclusions: Although the results of the study are consistent with the literature which show that attention deficit develops in MS, it is important in terms of showing that attention deficit changes depending on the duration of the disease. Focused attention, sustained attention, interference resistance and divided attention performance of RRMS patients showed a significant decline after the 7th year of the disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RRMS 患者的注意力障碍:病程的作用。
导言:关于 RRMS 患者不同类型的注意力受疾病持续时间影响的程度,尚未进行广泛的分析。因此,本研究旨在确定在 RRMS 患者的同质样本中,多发性硬化症患者与健康人相比在注意类型上是否存在差异,以及多发性硬化症患者的注意缺陷是从哪一年开始的。研究的另一个目的是考察多发性硬化症病程和刺激开始不同步对双重任务表现的影响:样本包括 RRMS 患者(53 人)和健康参与者(30 人),年龄在 20-49 岁之间,至少小学毕业。对比组中的健康参与者是通过滚雪球抽样技术获得的。研究人员进行了 Stroop 测试、取消测试、步调听觉连续加法测试、编码测试、WMS-R 数字跨度和视觉记忆跨度子测试,以评估注意力。在心理折射期范式的基础上开发的双重任务评估了注意力分散的表现:结果表明,RRMS 患者和健康参与者在不同类型的注意力方面存在显著差异(p p 结论:虽然研究结果与健康参与者的结果一致,但RRMS 患者和健康参与者在不同类型的注意力方面存在显著差异:尽管研究结果与文献中关于多发性硬化症患者会出现注意力缺陷的观点一致,但重要的是,研究结果表明,注意力缺陷会随着病程的延长而发生变化。RRMS 患者的集中注意力、持续注意力、抗干扰能力和分心能力在病程第 7 年后显著下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
The impact of noise exposure, time pressure, and cognitive load on objective task performance and subjective sensory overload and fatigue. Detecting noncredible symptomology in ADHD evaluations using machine learning. The time has come: discussing the clinical neuropsychology provider's role in cultural respect and inclusion. Analysis of skew, examination of intercorrelations, and determining the optimal threshold for performance invalidity when 10 performance validity tests are administered during a neuropsychological evaluation. The relationship between self-monitoring and cognitive strategy use in midlife and older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1