[Five myths about open science].

Lakartidningen Pub Date : 2024-11-13
Christian Rück, Robin Fondberg, Lisa Gunnarsson
{"title":"[Five myths about open science].","authors":"Christian Rück, Robin Fondberg, Lisa Gunnarsson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open science aims to make research accessible to all, enhancing transparency and promoting replication. It involves practices such as open access publishing, sharing statistical code, and making non-sensitive data a available to encourage critical review, reduce errors and prevent selective reporting of favorable results. A key component of open science is preregistration, where researchers outline their hypotheses and planned analysis methods in advance, minimizing bias and promoting accountability. Despite its benefits, misconceptions about open science practices hinder its widespread adoption among researchers. Common myths include the belief that preregistration prevents any deviation from the original plan, that it only applies to clinical trials, or that it's unnecessary if data have already been collected. By challenging these misunderstandings, we can leverage open science practices to improve the integrity and quality of research.</p>","PeriodicalId":17988,"journal":{"name":"Lakartidningen","volume":"121 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lakartidningen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open science aims to make research accessible to all, enhancing transparency and promoting replication. It involves practices such as open access publishing, sharing statistical code, and making non-sensitive data a available to encourage critical review, reduce errors and prevent selective reporting of favorable results. A key component of open science is preregistration, where researchers outline their hypotheses and planned analysis methods in advance, minimizing bias and promoting accountability. Despite its benefits, misconceptions about open science practices hinder its widespread adoption among researchers. Common myths include the belief that preregistration prevents any deviation from the original plan, that it only applies to clinical trials, or that it's unnecessary if data have already been collected. By challenging these misunderstandings, we can leverage open science practices to improve the integrity and quality of research.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[关于开放科学的五个神话]
开放科学旨在让所有人都能获取研究成果,提高透明度并促进复制。它涉及的做法包括开放出版、共享统计代码和提供非敏感数据,以鼓励批判性审查、减少错误和防止选择性地报道有利结果。开放科学的一个关键组成部分是预先注册,即研究人员事先概述他们的假设和计划的分析方法,从而最大限度地减少偏见并促进问责制。尽管开放科学实践好处多多,但对它的误解阻碍了它在研究人员中的广泛采用。常见的误解包括:认为预注册会阻止任何偏离原计划的行为;认为预注册只适用于临床试验;或者认为如果已经收集了数据,就没有必要进行预注册。通过挑战这些误解,我们可以利用开放科学实践来提高研究的完整性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lakartidningen
Lakartidningen Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
期刊最新文献
[AmbuReg - the Swedish quality register for emergency medical services]. [Gene editing is changing the treatment of hereditary diseases]. ABC: Aortagraftinfektioner. Cobenfy – ett nytt alternativ för behandling av schizofreni. [Paths to Swedish medical license for international medical graduates].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1