Karina C Geranios, Michael S Littau, Simon S Park, Talia B Baker, G Weldon Gilcrease, Ziga Cizman, Tyler Smith, Marshall S Baker
{"title":"Localized hepatocellular carcinoma: Is liver-directed therapy alone as efficacious as surgical resection?","authors":"Karina C Geranios, Michael S Littau, Simon S Park, Talia B Baker, G Weldon Gilcrease, Ziga Cizman, Tyler Smith, Marshall S Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies of the efficacy of nonsurgical methods of liver-directed therapy (percutaneous microwave or radiofrequency ablation, transarterial bland embolization, chemoembolization, and/or radioembolization) in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer lack contemporaneous comparative surgical cohorts. The role of these methods of liver-directed therapy as destination treatment in hepatocellular cancer is not well defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried our institutional registry for patients undergoing resection or liver-directed therapy alone for clinical stage I to IVa hepatocellular cancer between 2012 and 2022. Multivariable regression and Cox modeling were used to identify factors associated with resection and all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing resection were 1:3 propensity matched for age, Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score and clinical stage to those undergoing liver-directed therapy. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare 5-year disease-specific and overall survival for matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred thirty patients met inclusion criteria; 45 underwent resection, and 285 liver-directed therapy. On multivariable regression, factors associated with resection included age (adjusted odds ratio: 0.96, P = .007) and Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted odds ratio: 0.92, P = .033). On Cox modeling, factors associated with mortality-risk included Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.03, P = .01), advanced clinical stage (stage III adjusted hazards ratio: 1.9, P = .002), and resection (adjusted hazards ratio: 0.43, P = .001). Forty-five patients undergoing resection were matched to 135 undergoing liver-directed therapy. On Kaplan-Meier comparison of matched cohorts, patients undergoing resection demonstrated improved overall survival (38.1 vs 8.4%, P = .015) but disease-specific survival similar to that for those undergoing liver-directed therapy (84.0 vs 74.0%, P = .095).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Liver-directed therapy is effective as treatment for patients with localized hepatocellular cancer providing disease-specific survival similar to that provided by surgical resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108939"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Studies of the efficacy of nonsurgical methods of liver-directed therapy (percutaneous microwave or radiofrequency ablation, transarterial bland embolization, chemoembolization, and/or radioembolization) in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer lack contemporaneous comparative surgical cohorts. The role of these methods of liver-directed therapy as destination treatment in hepatocellular cancer is not well defined.
Methods: We queried our institutional registry for patients undergoing resection or liver-directed therapy alone for clinical stage I to IVa hepatocellular cancer between 2012 and 2022. Multivariable regression and Cox modeling were used to identify factors associated with resection and all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing resection were 1:3 propensity matched for age, Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score and clinical stage to those undergoing liver-directed therapy. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare 5-year disease-specific and overall survival for matched cohorts.
Results: Three hundred thirty patients met inclusion criteria; 45 underwent resection, and 285 liver-directed therapy. On multivariable regression, factors associated with resection included age (adjusted odds ratio: 0.96, P = .007) and Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted odds ratio: 0.92, P = .033). On Cox modeling, factors associated with mortality-risk included Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.03, P = .01), advanced clinical stage (stage III adjusted hazards ratio: 1.9, P = .002), and resection (adjusted hazards ratio: 0.43, P = .001). Forty-five patients undergoing resection were matched to 135 undergoing liver-directed therapy. On Kaplan-Meier comparison of matched cohorts, patients undergoing resection demonstrated improved overall survival (38.1 vs 8.4%, P = .015) but disease-specific survival similar to that for those undergoing liver-directed therapy (84.0 vs 74.0%, P = .095).
Conclusion: Liver-directed therapy is effective as treatment for patients with localized hepatocellular cancer providing disease-specific survival similar to that provided by surgical resection.
期刊介绍:
For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.