A Pilot Study of a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Procedural Curriculum for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003273
Jennifer Mitzman, Maegan Reynolds, Ashish Panchal, Jennifer Yee
{"title":"A Pilot Study of a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Procedural Curriculum for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows.","authors":"Jennifer Mitzman, Maegan Reynolds, Ashish Panchal, Jennifer Yee","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows are expected to perform high-risk procedures across a wide range of patient age, size, and physiology including procedures that are no longer required during pediatric residency training. Examples include central venous catheter (CVC) placement, endotracheal intubation of children and adolescents, and tube thoracostomy placement. Simulation-based mastery learning has demonstrated decreased patient morbidity. In this study, we describe implementation of a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) procedural curriculum for PEM fellows.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our PEM fellows underwent an SBML procedural curriculum for lumbar puncture (LP), CVC placement, endotracheal intubation, and tube thoracostomy placement. These procedures are mandatory for fellows to learn, have known association with potential iatrogenic injury, and are widely available commercial task trainers. Fellows underwent baseline assessments, group demonstration, deliberate practice, and then postassessments. For both pre- and postassessments, we used internally developed checklists with minimum passing scores (MPSs) calculated by the Mastery-Angoff technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen pediatrics residency-trained PEM fellows underwent this curriculum over a 2-year period. Six fellows (31.58%) achieved the MPS on all four procedures during their first posttest attempt. All fellows achieved the MPS on all four procedures by the second posttest attempt. Most fellows (17/19 or 89.47%) did not achieve the MPS on baseline LP assessments, despite inclusion of this procedure as an Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirement during their pediatric residency training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All participating PEM fellows demonstrated competency after training on four procedures associated with iatrogenic injuries. Using an SBML framework is a feasible method to teach procedural skills to PEM fellows, allowing them to demonstrate objective measures of competency in the simulation laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":"40 12","pages":"924-930"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows are expected to perform high-risk procedures across a wide range of patient age, size, and physiology including procedures that are no longer required during pediatric residency training. Examples include central venous catheter (CVC) placement, endotracheal intubation of children and adolescents, and tube thoracostomy placement. Simulation-based mastery learning has demonstrated decreased patient morbidity. In this study, we describe implementation of a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) procedural curriculum for PEM fellows.

Methods: Our PEM fellows underwent an SBML procedural curriculum for lumbar puncture (LP), CVC placement, endotracheal intubation, and tube thoracostomy placement. These procedures are mandatory for fellows to learn, have known association with potential iatrogenic injury, and are widely available commercial task trainers. Fellows underwent baseline assessments, group demonstration, deliberate practice, and then postassessments. For both pre- and postassessments, we used internally developed checklists with minimum passing scores (MPSs) calculated by the Mastery-Angoff technique.

Results: Nineteen pediatrics residency-trained PEM fellows underwent this curriculum over a 2-year period. Six fellows (31.58%) achieved the MPS on all four procedures during their first posttest attempt. All fellows achieved the MPS on all four procedures by the second posttest attempt. Most fellows (17/19 or 89.47%) did not achieve the MPS on baseline LP assessments, despite inclusion of this procedure as an Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirement during their pediatric residency training.

Conclusions: All participating PEM fellows demonstrated competency after training on four procedures associated with iatrogenic injuries. Using an SBML framework is a feasible method to teach procedural skills to PEM fellows, allowing them to demonstrate objective measures of competency in the simulation laboratory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科急诊医学实习生模拟掌握学习程序课程的试点研究。
目标:儿科急诊医学(PEM)研究员需要对不同年龄、体型和生理状况的患者实施高风险手术,包括在儿科住院医师培训期间不再需要的手术。例如,中心静脉导管(CVC)置入术、儿童和青少年气管插管术以及胸腔插管术。基于模拟的掌握学习已证明可降低患者的发病率。在本研究中,我们介绍了针对 PEM 学员的模拟掌握学习(SBML)程序课程的实施情况:我们的 PEM 学员接受了腰椎穿刺 (LP)、CVC 置入、气管插管和胸腔插管的 SBML 程序课程。这些程序是研究员必须学习的内容,已知与潜在的先天性损伤有关,并且是广泛使用的商业任务培训器械。学员们接受了基线评估、小组演示、刻意练习和后评估。在前评估和后评估中,我们都使用了内部开发的核对表,并通过掌握-安戈夫技术计算了最低及格分数(MPS):19名接受过儿科住院医师培训的PEM研究员在两年内接受了这一课程。六名研究员(31.58%)在首次测试后的尝试中,全部四个程序都达到了 MPS。所有学员在第二次测试后都达到了所有四项手术的 MPS 标准。大多数研究员(17/19 或 89.47%)在基线 LP 评估中未达到 MPS,尽管该程序已被列为儿科住院医师培训期间毕业医学教育认证委员会 (ACGME) 的要求:结论:所有参与培训的儿科住院医师在接受了与先天性损伤相关的四项手术培训后,都表现出了一定的能力。使用 SBML 框架向儿科住院医师培训学员传授手术技能是一种可行的方法,可让他们在模拟实验室中展示能力的客观指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study of a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Procedural Curriculum for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows. Evaluation of a Large Language Model on the American Academy of Pediatrics' PREP Emergency Medicine Question Bank. Neonatal Mastitis: Clinical Presentation and Approach to Evaluation and Management. Neonatal Mastitis: Clinical Presentation and Approach to Evaluation and Management. NOTE TO REVIEWERS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1