American College of Surgeons survival calculator for biliary tract cancers: using machine learning to individualize predictions.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.010
Lauren M Janczewski, Joseph Cotler, Xuan Zhu, Bryan Palis, Kelley Chan, Ryan P Merkow, Elizabeth B Habermann, Ronald J Weigel, Judy C Boughey
{"title":"American College of Surgeons survival calculator for biliary tract cancers: using machine learning to individualize predictions.","authors":"Lauren M Janczewski, Joseph Cotler, Xuan Zhu, Bryan Palis, Kelley Chan, Ryan P Merkow, Elizabeth B Habermann, Ronald J Weigel, Judy C Boughey","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cancer prognosis is most commonly estimated by tumor stage, survival is multifactorial. Our objective was to develop an American College of Surgeons \"Biliary Tract Cancer Survival Calculator\" prototype using machine learning to generate personalized survival estimates based on patient, tumor, and treatment factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Cancer Database was used to identify all patients with biliary tract malignancies between 2010 and 2017 including intrahepatic bile duct, extrahepatic bile duct, and gallbladder cancers. Included variables were determined based on random forest algorithms and review by subject matter experts. Data were split into 80% training and 20% test data sets. Extreme gradient boosting with survival embeddings, a machine learning class, generated 3-year survival curves. Internal 5-fold cross validation was evaluated through concordance statistics (c-index), Brier scores, distant calibration, and time-dependent area under the curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 62,877 patients were included. Metastatic disease, age at diagnosis, and lack of surgical treatment were identified as most influential on worse survival outcomes via random forest. The final model included patient (age, sex, race and ethnicity, comorbidities), tumor (clinical TNM stage, disease site, grade), and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation) factors. Accurate model discrimination, calibration, and performance was demonstrated on internal validation (c-index: 0.74, Brier score: 0.14, distant calibration: P < .001, area under the curve: 0.83). These metrics were notably improved compared to a model based solely on stage (c-index: 0.64, Brier score: 0.18, distant calibration: P < .001, time-dependent area under the curve: 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This \"Biliary Tract Cancer Survival Calculator\" represents a highly accurate and comprehensive prognostic tool to estimate individualized survival estimates in real time.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although cancer prognosis is most commonly estimated by tumor stage, survival is multifactorial. Our objective was to develop an American College of Surgeons "Biliary Tract Cancer Survival Calculator" prototype using machine learning to generate personalized survival estimates based on patient, tumor, and treatment factors.

Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify all patients with biliary tract malignancies between 2010 and 2017 including intrahepatic bile duct, extrahepatic bile duct, and gallbladder cancers. Included variables were determined based on random forest algorithms and review by subject matter experts. Data were split into 80% training and 20% test data sets. Extreme gradient boosting with survival embeddings, a machine learning class, generated 3-year survival curves. Internal 5-fold cross validation was evaluated through concordance statistics (c-index), Brier scores, distant calibration, and time-dependent area under the curve.

Results: Overall, 62,877 patients were included. Metastatic disease, age at diagnosis, and lack of surgical treatment were identified as most influential on worse survival outcomes via random forest. The final model included patient (age, sex, race and ethnicity, comorbidities), tumor (clinical TNM stage, disease site, grade), and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation) factors. Accurate model discrimination, calibration, and performance was demonstrated on internal validation (c-index: 0.74, Brier score: 0.14, distant calibration: P < .001, area under the curve: 0.83). These metrics were notably improved compared to a model based solely on stage (c-index: 0.64, Brier score: 0.18, distant calibration: P < .001, time-dependent area under the curve: 0.68).

Conclusion: This "Biliary Tract Cancer Survival Calculator" represents a highly accurate and comprehensive prognostic tool to estimate individualized survival estimates in real time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国外科学院胆道癌生存率计算器:利用机器学习进行个性化预测。
背景:尽管癌症预后最常根据肿瘤分期来估计,但生存率是多因素的。我们的目标是利用机器学习技术开发美国外科学院 "胆道癌症生存率计算器 "原型,根据患者、肿瘤和治疗因素生成个性化的生存率估计值:利用国家癌症数据库确定2010年至2017年间所有胆道恶性肿瘤患者,包括肝内胆管癌、肝外胆管癌和胆囊癌。纳入的变量是根据随机森林算法和主题专家的审查确定的。数据分为 80% 的训练数据集和 20% 的测试数据集。极端梯度提升与生存嵌入(一种机器学习类)生成了 3 年生存曲线。通过一致性统计(c-index)、Brier评分、远期校准和随时间变化的曲线下面积对内部5倍交叉验证进行了评估:共纳入 62 877 名患者。通过随机森林确定转移性疾病、诊断时的年龄和缺乏手术治疗对较差的生存结果影响最大。最终模型包括患者(年龄、性别、种族和民族、合并症)、肿瘤(临床TNM分期、发病部位、分级)和治疗(手术、化疗、放疗)因素。内部验证结果表明,该模型具有准确的判别、校准和性能(c-index:0.74, Brier score: 0.14, distant calibration:P < .001,曲线下面积:0.83):0.83).与仅基于阶段的模型相比,这些指标都有明显改善(c-index:0.64, Brier score: 0.18, distant calibration:P < .001,随时间变化的曲线下面积:0.68):0.68):该 "胆道癌症生存期计算器 "是一种高度准确、全面的预后工具,可实时估算个体化生存期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. Discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1