The Impact of Palivizumab for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prophylaxis on Preschool Childhood Asthma.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccines Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.3390/vaccines12111269
Hannah Ora Hasson, Yoav Bachar, Itai Hazan, Inbal Golan-Tripto, Aviv Goldbart, David Greenberg, Guy Hazan
{"title":"The Impact of Palivizumab for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prophylaxis on Preschool Childhood Asthma.","authors":"Hannah Ora Hasson, Yoav Bachar, Itai Hazan, Inbal Golan-Tripto, Aviv Goldbart, David Greenberg, Guy Hazan","doi":"10.3390/vaccines12111269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections in infants and is associated with an increased risk of asthma development. Palivizumab, an RSV prophylactic, reduces RSV-related hospitalizations in high-risk infants, but its impact on long-term asthma outcomes remains unclear. This study compares asthma-related healthcare utilization in preschool children born prematurely between those who received Palivizumab (the Prophylaxis (+) group) and those who did not (the Prophylaxis (-) group).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study utilized data from Clalit Healthcare Services in Israel. The study included children born between 32 + 6 and 34 + 6 weeks of gestational age from 2011 to 2018. Descriptive analysis, univariate analysis, and multivariate logistic regression were performed to compare the Prophylaxis (+) and the Prophylaxis (-) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4503 children were included, with 3287 in the Prophylaxis (+) group and 1216 in the Prophylaxis (-) group. Palivizumab administration was associated with reduced hospitalizations for RSV bronchiolitis (1.8% vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). However, no significant differences were observed in multivariate analysis for long-term asthma outcomes, including asthma diagnosis (OR = 1.04, CI = 0.84-1.30, <i>p</i> = 0.7) or emergency department visits for asthma (OR = 0.79, CI = 0.54-1.17, <i>p</i> = 0.2). Similarly, Palivizumab administration was not associated with the purchase of short-acting beta-agonists (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.98-1.32, <i>p</i> = 0.084), inhaled corticosteroids (OR = 1.1, CI = 0.93-1.32, <i>p</i> = 0.3), or oral corticosteroids (OR = 1.09, CI = 0.94-1.26, <i>p</i> = 0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While Palivizumab effectively reduces RSV acute bronchiolitis in preterm infants, it does not significantly impact long-term preschool asthma-related healthcare utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"12 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11598595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12111269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections in infants and is associated with an increased risk of asthma development. Palivizumab, an RSV prophylactic, reduces RSV-related hospitalizations in high-risk infants, but its impact on long-term asthma outcomes remains unclear. This study compares asthma-related healthcare utilization in preschool children born prematurely between those who received Palivizumab (the Prophylaxis (+) group) and those who did not (the Prophylaxis (-) group).

Methods: This nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study utilized data from Clalit Healthcare Services in Israel. The study included children born between 32 + 6 and 34 + 6 weeks of gestational age from 2011 to 2018. Descriptive analysis, univariate analysis, and multivariate logistic regression were performed to compare the Prophylaxis (+) and the Prophylaxis (-) groups.

Results: In total, 4503 children were included, with 3287 in the Prophylaxis (+) group and 1216 in the Prophylaxis (-) group. Palivizumab administration was associated with reduced hospitalizations for RSV bronchiolitis (1.8% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.003). However, no significant differences were observed in multivariate analysis for long-term asthma outcomes, including asthma diagnosis (OR = 1.04, CI = 0.84-1.30, p = 0.7) or emergency department visits for asthma (OR = 0.79, CI = 0.54-1.17, p = 0.2). Similarly, Palivizumab administration was not associated with the purchase of short-acting beta-agonists (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.98-1.32, p = 0.084), inhaled corticosteroids (OR = 1.1, CI = 0.93-1.32, p = 0.3), or oral corticosteroids (OR = 1.09, CI = 0.94-1.26, p = 0.3).

Conclusions: While Palivizumab effectively reduces RSV acute bronchiolitis in preterm infants, it does not significantly impact long-term preschool asthma-related healthcare utilization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于预防呼吸道合胞病毒的帕利珠单抗对学龄前儿童哮喘的影响
背景:呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是婴儿下呼吸道感染的主要病因,与哮喘发病风险增加有关。帕利珠单抗是一种RSV预防药物,可减少高风险婴儿与RSV相关的住院治疗,但其对哮喘长期预后的影响仍不清楚。本研究比较了接受帕利珠单抗治疗的早产儿(预防(+)组)和未接受帕利珠单抗治疗的早产儿(预防(-)组)在哮喘相关医疗保健方面的使用情况:这项以人口为基础的全国性回顾性队列研究利用了以色列 Clalit 医疗保健服务机构的数据。研究对象包括 2011 年至 2018 年出生的胎龄在 32+6 周和 34+6 周之间的儿童。通过描述性分析、单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归对预防(+)组和预防(-)组进行比较:结果:共纳入4503名儿童,其中预防(+)组3287名,预防(-)组1216名。使用帕利珠单抗可减少因RSV支气管炎住院的人数(1.8% vs. 3.3%,p = 0.003)。然而,在哮喘长期结局的多变量分析中,包括哮喘诊断(OR = 1.04,CI = 0.84-1.30,p = 0.7)或哮喘急诊就诊(OR = 0.79,CI = 0.54-1.17,p = 0.2),未观察到明显差异。同样,使用帕利珠单抗与购买短效β-激动剂(OR = 1.14,95% CI = 0.98-1.32,p = 0.084)、吸入皮质类固醇(OR = 1.1,CI = 0.93-1.32,p = 0.3)或口服皮质类固醇(OR = 1.09,CI = 0.94-1.26,p = 0.3)无关:尽管帕利珠单抗能有效减轻早产儿的RSV急性支气管炎,但对学龄前哮喘相关医疗保健的长期利用率并无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccines
Vaccines Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1853
审稿时长
18.06 days
期刊介绍: Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focused on laboratory and clinical vaccine research, utilization and immunization. Vaccines publishes high quality reviews, regular research papers, communications and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Preliminary Study on Type I Interferon as a Mucosal Adjuvant for Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus F Protein. Association Between Influenza Vaccine and Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Childhood Mandatory Vaccinations: Current Situation in European Countries and Changes Occurred from 2014 to 2024. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions in Global Immunization Strategies. Sindbis Virus Replicon-Based SARS-CoV-2 and Dengue Combined Vaccine Candidates Elicit Immune Responses and Provide Protective Immunity in Mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1