Social Risk Coding by Amygdala Activity and Connectivity with the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1149-24.2024
Jae-Chang Kim, Leopold Zangemeister, Philippe N Tobler, Wolfram Schultz, Fabian Grabenhorst
{"title":"Social Risk Coding by Amygdala Activity and Connectivity with the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex.","authors":"Jae-Chang Kim, Leopold Zangemeister, Philippe N Tobler, Wolfram Schultz, Fabian Grabenhorst","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1149-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk is a fundamental factor affecting individual and social economic decisions, but its neural correlates are largely unexplored in the social domain. The amygdala, together with the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), is thought to play a central role in risk-taking. Here, we investigated in human volunteers (<i>n</i> = 20; 11 females) how risk (defined as the variance of reward probability distributions) in a social situation affects decisions and concomitant neural activity as measured with fMRI. We found separate variance-risk signals for social and nonsocial outcomes in the amygdala. Specifically, amygdala activity increased parametrically with social reward variance of presented choice options and on separate trials with nonsocial reward variance. Behaviorally, 75% of participants were averse to social risk as estimated in a Becker-DeGroot-Marschak auction-like procedure. The stronger this aversion, the more negative the coupling between risk-related amygdala regions and dACC. This negative relation was significant for social risk attitude but not for the attitude toward variance-risk in juice outcomes. Our results indicate that the amygdala and its coupling with dACC process objective and subjectively evaluated social risk. Moreover, while social risk can be captured with a framework originally established by finance theory for nonsocial risk, the amygdala appears to process social risk largely separately from nonsocial risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1149-24.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk is a fundamental factor affecting individual and social economic decisions, but its neural correlates are largely unexplored in the social domain. The amygdala, together with the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), is thought to play a central role in risk-taking. Here, we investigated in human volunteers (n = 20; 11 females) how risk (defined as the variance of reward probability distributions) in a social situation affects decisions and concomitant neural activity as measured with fMRI. We found separate variance-risk signals for social and nonsocial outcomes in the amygdala. Specifically, amygdala activity increased parametrically with social reward variance of presented choice options and on separate trials with nonsocial reward variance. Behaviorally, 75% of participants were averse to social risk as estimated in a Becker-DeGroot-Marschak auction-like procedure. The stronger this aversion, the more negative the coupling between risk-related amygdala regions and dACC. This negative relation was significant for social risk attitude but not for the attitude toward variance-risk in juice outcomes. Our results indicate that the amygdala and its coupling with dACC process objective and subjectively evaluated social risk. Moreover, while social risk can be captured with a framework originally established by finance theory for nonsocial risk, the amygdala appears to process social risk largely separately from nonsocial risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杏仁核活动的社会风险编码以及与背侧前扣带回皮层的连接。
风险是影响个人和社会经济决策的一个基本因素,但在社会领域,风险的神经相关性在很大程度上尚未得到研究。杏仁核和背侧前扣带回皮层(dACC)被认为在风险承担中发挥着核心作用。在这里,我们研究了人类志愿者(人数=20;11 名女性)在社交场合中的风险(定义为奖励概率分布的方差)如何影响决策以及用 fMRI 测量的相应神经活动。我们在杏仁核中分别发现了社交结果和非社交结果的方差风险信号。具体来说,杏仁核活动会随着选择选项的社会奖赏方差以及非社会奖赏方差的单独试验而增加。在行为上,75% 的参与者对社会风险有厌恶感,这是在类似于 Becker-DeGroot-Marschak 拍卖的程序中估算出来的。这种厌恶情绪越强烈,与风险相关的杏仁核区域和 dACC 之间的耦合关系就越负面。这种负相关关系对社会风险态度很重要,但对果汁结果中的方差风险态度却不重要。我们的研究结果表明,杏仁核及其与 dACC 的耦合处理了客观和主观评估的社会风险。此外,虽然社会风险可以用金融理论最初为非社会风险建立的框架来捕捉,但杏仁核似乎在很大程度上将社会风险与非社会风险分开处理。在社交场合,对他人行为的不确定性("社交风险")同样会引导我们做出决策,并可能导致社交焦虑。令人惊讶的是,人们对处理社交风险的神经机制知之甚少。在这里,我们研究了人类在评估来自社交伙伴个人赞美的不确定性的社交风险时的神经活动。杏仁核是一种与情绪和社会行为有关的大脑结构,它的活动反映了社会风险水平。杏仁核与前扣带回皮层的功能连接反映了个体对社会风险的厌恶程度。我们的研究结果将风险评估扩展到了社交领域,并为研究社交焦虑等心理健康障碍中的社交风险态度铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
期刊最新文献
Repurposing Dexmedetomidine: Early Pharmacological Hypothermia Enhances Neuroprotection and Improves Locomotor and Bladder Functional Recovery After SCI. The co-modification of brain activity, functional connectivity and behavior following learning. A dorsal versus ventral network for understanding others in the developing brain. Different Reliance on Sensory Reinstatement and Internally Transformed Representations during Vivid Retrieval of Visual and Auditory Episodes. Controlled Retrieval Relies on Directed Interactions between Semantic Control Regions and Visual Cortex: MEG Evidence from Oscillatory Dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1