Feasibility of a Non-Anticipatory, Random-Action Target System to Improve Shooting Performance: A Brief Field Trial.

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.3390/sports12110305
Matthew Lee Smith, Ali Boolani
{"title":"Feasibility of a Non-Anticipatory, Random-Action Target System to Improve Shooting Performance: A Brief Field Trial.","authors":"Matthew Lee Smith, Ali Boolani","doi":"10.3390/sports12110305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Firearm shooting performance training rightfully focuses on shooting accuracy; however, additional foci should include decision processing speed and reaction time associated with decision making to avoid reaction-only based shooting responses. While advancements in realistic training environments attempt to mimic \"real-world\" situations, many remain largely anticipatory or subject to a speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT). The purpose of this brief field trial was to demonstrate the feasibility of a random-action target system (RATS) on participants' shooting performance (i.e., accuracy, omission, and commission rates) among a convenience sample of six retired police officers and competitive shooters (age range: 45-58 years, mean age = 52.5 ± 5.89). Observational data were gathered from a single-day, three-round trial to test shooting accuracy and shooting errors when shooters were unable to anticipate target appearance location and target exposure speed. In Trial 1, the target exposure time was 0.5 s, which increased to 0.7 s in Trial 2, and decreased back to 0.5 s in Trial 3. Shooting accuracy generally increased, while omission and commission generally decreased, when shooters were presented with targets exposed for longer durations. From Trial 1 to Trial 3 (both trials with 0.5 s target exposures), shooters showed higher median accuracy rates, lower median omission rates, and lower median commission rates. Findings suggest that a non-anticipatory, RATS holds promise for improving shooting performance and offset SAT among shooters with firearm experience. However, additional trials are needed with the RATS to replicate these findings among a larger and more diverse set of participants, who train with the RATS consistently, over longer durations.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11598038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12110305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Firearm shooting performance training rightfully focuses on shooting accuracy; however, additional foci should include decision processing speed and reaction time associated with decision making to avoid reaction-only based shooting responses. While advancements in realistic training environments attempt to mimic "real-world" situations, many remain largely anticipatory or subject to a speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT). The purpose of this brief field trial was to demonstrate the feasibility of a random-action target system (RATS) on participants' shooting performance (i.e., accuracy, omission, and commission rates) among a convenience sample of six retired police officers and competitive shooters (age range: 45-58 years, mean age = 52.5 ± 5.89). Observational data were gathered from a single-day, three-round trial to test shooting accuracy and shooting errors when shooters were unable to anticipate target appearance location and target exposure speed. In Trial 1, the target exposure time was 0.5 s, which increased to 0.7 s in Trial 2, and decreased back to 0.5 s in Trial 3. Shooting accuracy generally increased, while omission and commission generally decreased, when shooters were presented with targets exposed for longer durations. From Trial 1 to Trial 3 (both trials with 0.5 s target exposures), shooters showed higher median accuracy rates, lower median omission rates, and lower median commission rates. Findings suggest that a non-anticipatory, RATS holds promise for improving shooting performance and offset SAT among shooters with firearm experience. However, additional trials are needed with the RATS to replicate these findings among a larger and more diverse set of participants, who train with the RATS consistently, over longer durations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高射击成绩的非预期随机行动目标系统的可行性:简短现场试验。
枪械射击性能训练的重点理所当然是射击精度,但还应包括与决策相关的决策处理速度和反应时间,以避免仅凭反应做出射击反应。虽然逼真训练环境的进步试图模拟 "真实世界 "的情况,但许多情况在很大程度上仍然是预测性的,或受制于速度-准确性权衡(SAT)。这项简短的实地试验旨在证明随机行动目标系统(RATS)对参与者射击成绩(即准确率、遗漏率和犯规率)的可行性,试验对象是六名退休警官和竞技射击运动员(年龄范围:45-58 岁,平均年龄 = 52.5 ± 5.89)。从单日三轮试验中收集观察数据,以测试射击者在无法预测目标出现位置和目标曝光速度时的射击准确性和射击失误。在试验 1 中,目标曝光时间为 0.5 秒,试验 2 中增至 0.7 秒,试验 3 中又降至 0.5 秒。当射击者面对暴露时间更长的目标时,射击准确率普遍提高,而漏射和误射则普遍降低。从试验 1 到试验 3(两次试验的目标暴露时间均为 0.5 秒),射击者的射击准确率中位数较高,遗漏率中位数较低,失误率中位数较低。研究结果表明,非预期性 RATS 有望提高射击成绩,并抵消有射击经验的射击者的 SAT。不过,还需要对 RATS 进行更多的试验,以便在更多和更多样化的参与者中重复这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Between-Session Reliability of Portable Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull and Countermovement Jump Tests in Elite Male Ice Hockey Players from the Swedish Hockey League. "All Hands on Deck": A Systematic Review of Concussion Guidelines Across All Sailing Sports and a Call to Action. Differential Balance Enhancements Associated with Conventional Balance Training and Portable Slackline Board Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Yoga for Neurodegenerative Disorders: Therapeutic Effects, Mechanisms, and Applications in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease. Competition Stress Prolongs Exercise Recovery in Female Division I Collegiate Soccer Players.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1